Muller Dynamo

[Khwartz]

Hi Marius! thanks for your reply and the details I wanted to know
So good run to your crazy speed-motor!
Regards.

[crazycut06]

Hi Marius,
    Can you pls. post a schematic for your driving circuit, its hard to see in the video's what parts you have used, as im planning to use it as my driving circuit for my muller project... with your circuit using less amps we might have a higher chance for a looper...
     Thanks in advance...


Regards crazycut06

[mariuscivic]

deleted

[Khwartz]

For Kone, Marius and all:

"The number of times that an electron is cycled, sets the collective energy potential present. The electrical equivalent of E = mC2 is E = (Volts x Amperes) x (Cycles Per Second)2."

"In resonant air-core coil energy transfer, the increase in flux lines present disturbs more electrons than previously, resulting in over-unity energy being present and available.
Energy stored, times the cycles per second, represents the energy being pumped by the system. Capacitors and inductors store electrons temporarily.

Capacitor formula: W = 0.5 x C x E x Cycles per second where:

W = energy in Joules (Watt Seconds )
C = capacitance in farads
E = applied potential in volts squared.

Inductor (Coil) formula: W = 0.5 x L x I x Cycles per second where:

W = energy in Joules (Watt Seconds )
L = inductance in henrys
I = current in amperes squared

Both one henry, and one farad, equal one volt. The higher the cycles per second, including the squaring of the flux lines, cause a large increase in the amount of energy being produced.

The above combined with a resonant energy induction system (where all electrons are moving in the same direction at the same time), make the next move into over-unity practical"

http://www.free-energy-info.com/Smith.pdf

As I could understand researches in non-linear effect, leads to the fact that would be in plasma or even a ordinary gravitational pendulum, there is a threshold of "tension" (voltage) under which a pendulum always need to be sustain by more energy to be maintained its level of energy, but up to this threshold, the movement can increase infinitely when reach a phenomenon of self-resonance.

http://socrates.berkeley.edu/~fajans/Autoresonance/Autoresonance.htm

Looks Don Smith said that when resonance is reached it's like superconductance phenomenon and inductance become zero.

For me, I suppose that the high frequencies makes in addition to the last point, a Venturi like effect, but with particles around the wires and coils, that make the same as vacuum-pumps, but with EM fields and waves.

So I would say that more the rotor speed-up, as we increase the frequency of the pics and feeds cycles of caps, more we have chances to reach that point where self-resonnance could be achieved, and so, overunity too.

Wishing it could help

Cheers.

This I think is to compare with 

Cheers.

[konehead]

hi Mariu
thats not a boring video I think - it is great to watch...
what size is that AC cap that you put into circuit via black alligator clip that makes it run much lower in draw?
Does this AC cap go across the coil, or the swithicng?
When you run it back to the big battery, I notice draw does go up a little, but it seems to "sound" better however...
Can you check the amperage going into that big battery with an ammeter in line?
It could be that the same amount of amps going into the battery is also what the small amount of draw increase to the motor coil is, so there might or might not be a "gain".
Those directionals are fun to use as motor coil pulsers arent they - it could be since that way is meant to swtich AC, when you switch DC with them, their ability to swtich AC realy helps in pulling out all of the backemf/recoil of the motor coil...
I think you can improve this even more if you "switch-out" the backemf/recoil, especially what fills up the big battery at particular points in the rotation - try about 5 degrees retarded to the motor coil pulse and overlapping a bit, so you  make sure the backemf switch is ON, and is connecting the diode(s) (or FWBR) to the battery (or cap) at instant motor coil switch opens...
For "backemf switch" put another bidirection mosfets like you have already (IRFP460) on that diode that hits battery would be good place for it in what you have - so that this 2nd backemf swtich connects the battery to charge only when this 2nd swtihc is ON....have same type hall effect and same way to trip hall effect as your motor coil circuit is already so it would be easy to do..

when using bidirectional mosfets for motor coil switching, I like to use a FWBR to pull out the backemf/recoil power - put one AC leg of bridge on DRAIN #1 and other AC leg on DRAIN #2 - then DC into DC type capapcitor (this would "replace" you AC cap more or less but maybe leaving the AC cap in place as is will make it better)

wiht coil shorting, (other subject) you should have some of those IRFP460s in paralell - so maybe 4 or 5 in paraell on each side of bidirectional mosfets so 8 or 10 total number of mosfets you would need......having very low resistance and high amperage ability to the coil-shorting event is super important - this is my latest theory why your coil shorting had lenz lugging to it last time you tested it out....when you put mosfets bidiretional, it makes resistance higher too, so have at least a couple of those IRRP460s paralell on "each side" of the bidirecitonal mosfets...
Also I got my pulse width (at 60hz sinewave to coils) to be only .25 milliseconds or mabye even less, so the coil-short is jsut a very narrow slit on the scope - and caps fill up just as fast if not faster as 1ms or 2 ms, (which at that pulse width does cause some lenz lugging)
With your  high rpm motor, you are going to probably need very very very narrow pulse width to coil shorting....I could never of got down to .25ms unless I did the pulsewidth adjust method with the bidirectional mosfets using one into another - one bidimosfet normally-OFF switches-ON and other bidimosfet normally ON switches OFF and connect them ins series  and each with own hall effect and distance between hall effects will determine pulse width...for this I needed the 4421 and the 4422 drivers so one can normally ON and other normally OFF....
I think also what you have now will be improved if you use a driver chip - it will slam off much faster, and harder, the mosfet, and you will catch more backemf it iwll also turn ON quicker, and harder too, so a little more punch to the pulse....that is what they say anyways! There are 4421 and 4422 drivers on EBAY if you can't find any....sooner or later you should start using them - it would be nice to leave everything as is in your present motor coil pulsing circuit and put in a driver, and see if there really is any dramatic difference....they arent hard to hook up - jsut a couple resistors and couple of caps and power supply for halls also powers the driver...