Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Muller Dynamo

Started by Schpankme, December 31, 2007, 10:48:41 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 61 Guests are viewing this topic.

bolt

Quote from: gauschor on May 10, 2011, 07:26:08 AM
@bolt: are you sure it would work without the pulses? I have my doubts, because what if the pulses caused by the hall sensors and therefore the manipulated polarity of the ferrite cores influence each one of the passing rotor magnets? Then the pulsing would be crucial to the system and it wouldn't be only the "driving" purpose. In that case a "replication" with a motor at the rotor axis instead of the driving coils wouldn't succeed.

The pulses are ONLY connected to the drive coils to provide rotation. They have nothing to do with the generator coils. This is not speculation but a fact as i know and have seen similar devices working years ago. I seen RV loop setups and RV's driving muller style generators generating HUNDREDS of watts OU. SO therefore any efficient method to provide rotation and convert ALL the coils to generator coils will work but please don't try a standard DC model motor they are only about 65% efficient.  For a powerful setup with say 2" hockey puck coils and neos producing 100 watts each coil for a 1kw system use 3 phase RV to drive it.  Also the rotor doesn’t have to be 100% lug free. Its actually beneficial to have very SLIGHT drag on each coil at full load as it means the system is tuned to the peak. So the rotor might take 30w to spin it but who cares when you are making in excess of a Kw.

k4zep

Right now I don't give a darn about theory. Too much BS and not enough building.   Romero has shown us a working machine.  He has been as straightforward as any builder I have run across in many years.  So I have only one more question.

Romero, define "Tuning"  in stages.  Are you first tuning for minimum drag on the wheel using the bias magnets and spacing between coils and magnets?  Then do you tune for maximum output, that is maximum peak to peak on the pulses from a core/coil combination, or is it constantly a combination of the two?  Do you tune first without the cap, watching speed of rotor, etc.  And or, do you tune for maximum voltage and current availability on the cap using the rectified DC into a load?  I assume you always have a load on the output wheel and or the individual single coils/magnet assemblies during this process.

Very shortly there will be many different version of this device running!  I  have built many pulse motors over the years and seen the exact
same waveform before rectification many times and never came up with them being OU, But my pulses were NOT offset  from each other
by the even/odd coil system (more Bedini like or variations)  and I did not use the external bias magnets or the ferrite core's.  This is the last question I will ask. Being a old time diddle stick twiddler, I know this can be difficult.

Please explain your description of Tuning if possible  in general terms from start to finish
.  Please!

Ben K4ZEP

neptune

To all sceptics and naysayers .This thread is for replicators . There is another thread for discussion of the Muller dynamo .Why not go there .If you disbelieve in this technology , just leave us alone .|You may feel that we are wasting time and money . It is ours to waste . There are worse hobbbies we could have , like beating up old ladies , or collecting child pornography .

powercat

Quote from: neptune on May 10, 2011, 07:54:07 AM
To all sceptics and naysayers .This thread is for replicators . There is another thread for discussion of the Muller dynamo .Why not go there .If you disbelieve in this technology , just leave us alone .|You may feel that we are wasting time and money . It is ours to waste . There are worse hobbbies we could have , like beating up old ladies , or collecting child pornography .

Here is a link to the other thread.
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=10700.msg284734#msg284734
When logic and proportion Have fallen
Go ask Alice When she's ten feet tall

nul-points

Quote from: k4zep on May 10, 2011, 07:53:26 AM
Romero, define "Tuning"  in stages.
[...]
Please explain your description of Tuning if possible  in general terms from start to finish.  Please!

Ben K4ZEP

hi Ben

we've scavenged this whole thread for Romero's build tips and they're collected in a few separate pages at our blog, if that's any help

the section on testing is at:
  http://mullerlite.blogspot.com/p/romerouk-testing-tips.html

apologies that they're just raw quotes at the moment - may be a bit of overlap in some of his statements

hope this helps!
np
(armchair mechanic)  ;)


http://docsfreelunch.blogspot.com
"To do is to be" ---  Descartes;
"To be is to do"  ---  Jean Paul Sarte;
"Do be do be do" ---  F. Sinatra