Muller Dynamo

[khabe]

I am building a Motor/Generator but its not aligned with RomeroUK's work so I have not posted any progress here. But this helps all of us building Motor/Generators.

I believe this will be of at least some use.

All the best

  Chris

Yeah, nice stuff 
http://www.flickr.com/photos/curiousexpeditions/514913582/ 
http://www.earlytech.com/shop/view_item/620304367
http://www.edisonian.com/edisonian001.htm
http://www.sparkmuseum.com/MOTORS.HTM
http://www.sciencephoto.com/images/imagePopUpDetails.html?pop=1&id=865100056&pviewid=&country=76&search=&matchtype=FUZZY 

All the best,
cheers,
khabe

[xenomorphlabs]

My Scope Analysis shows a very interesting wave that is only shown one other place I know. The G-Field Generator or the Kromrey Converter. Same device.

Especially because Romero HIMSELF (!!!) stated that the Kromrey Converter IS
the same device/principle but even simpler here:
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=3842.msg284711#msg284711

and here he sais that he succesfully experimentally confirmed the Kromrey functionality and that he sees his own device as an advancement over that:

http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=3842.msg284736#msg284736

For some reason, this is not given any attention by the folks that seek to explain the principle with purely lenz-related ideas ...

[neptune]

@DimaWari. Your circuit diagram of the standard alternator has brought out something that has been nagging at my subconscious for weeks . The alternator you show is star connected as opposed to delta .All the coils are connected together at a central point . But notice that this point is not connected to the 3 phase rectifier . Now imagine that we convert it to a 4 phase alternator . so we add another coil and connect one of its ends to the central star point . Its other end is connected to the rectifier by ADDING TWO MORE DIODES ON THE RIGHT .. So for each extra coil we add , we need two more diodes . So for seven coils ,we only need 16 diodes as opposed to 7 x4 =28 diodes if we have a separate bridge rectifier for each coil . Less cost , less diode voltage drop . I have no idea if this would be better than the Romero arrangement or not . But for guys looking for something to try , this is an idea .Note that in the standard alternator , the coils are out of phase with each other, and it still works OK .

[neptune]

@free . I like your style and the use of low cost materials for prototyping. I assume you have gone for air core coils because you dont yet have ferrites .I would like to experiment with Fe3O4 cores , but the instructions for those are ambiguous . They talk about sandwiching the filled moulds between two magnets , but it says to place the magnets either side of the moulds . I would assume that they mean the ENDS of the mould so the the lines of force are aligned with the long axis of the core .

[nul-points]

[...]
I would like to experiment with Fe3O4 cores , but the instructions for those are ambiguous . They talk about sandwiching the filled moulds between two magnets , but it says to place the magnets either side of the moulds . I would assume that they mean the ENDS of the mould so the the lines of force are aligned with the long axis of the core .

hi neptune

you can still align the field lines with the long core axis with the mags either side

i do this with my Cells - arrange two (or more?) mags with their pole-to-pole axis parallel to the long core axis - all Ns facing same direction

if you place more than two mags around the core diam., you can get a more concentrated field down the core axis than just using two mags one each end

also opportunity to 'stack' these 'sidewinders' in series

need to take steps to hold the assembly very firmly tho' of course, cause LOTS of repelling force!


(this has been a public service announcement on behalf of Bikers Eat More Fruit)

have a good day 
np


http://docsfreelunch.blogspot.com