Muller Dynamo

bolt · June 21, 2011, 10:28:01 AM

Romero you said "I cannot build or describe details about my previous setup as that does not belong to me and never did."

Can you clarify this please? So the device may not belong to you now i understand that gone is gone but then you said "and never did"?? So you are talking about IP rights and patents? So i presume the device already has patents in part or IP rights to the technology so when you did your demo you had a little reminder to let you know in effect you was trespassing? Have i got this right?

Did you knowingly use others IP rights or was this a genuine mistake?

You see if you explained weeks ago this it will prevent other people making the same mistakes and look for alternative solutions which is clear why you are now taking a completely different approach on your new builds. It also resolves a lot of speculation and issues people couldn't explain. Oh and also you can be dead sure that some people here only want to replicate it so they can run off to the patent office. Well they are in for shock then would you say? On the flip side if the technology is already "owned" it gives serious credibility to the device as 100% real even for those that had any doubts.

romerouk · June 21, 2011, 10:40:28 AM

@plengo
I would not delete any posts and leave them as they are, there will be a time when things will completely change and we don't need to remove or hate the people talking against our builds, most of them have good intentions but did not understand it yet.
Regarding this replication, I can see things better than anyone and at least 2 people are on the right spot, realised that and stopped anymore info.I know that one of them will release all info once he is very sure about the results.
In the end I am not the moderator but I will only remove posts where people are using very bad or nasty words.
Just start another tread and lock this one, people should still be able to go back and read all posts if they wish.
Regards,
Romero

romerouk · June 21, 2011, 11:04:16 AM

Quote from: bolt on June 21, 2011, 10:28:01 AM
Romero you said "I cannot build or describe details about my previous setup as that does not belong to me and never did."

Can you clarify this please? So the device may not belong to you now i understand that gone is gone but then you said "and never did"?? So you are talking about IP rights and patents? So i presume the device already has patents in part or IP rights to the technology so when you did your demo you had a little reminder to let you know in effect you was trespassing? Have i got this right?

Did you knowingly use others IP rights or was this a genuine mistake?

You see if you explained weeks ago this it will prevent other people making the same mistakes and look for alternative solutions which is clear why you are now taking a completely different approach on your new builds. It also resolves a lot of speculation and issues people couldn't explain. Oh and also you can be dead sure that some people here only want to replicate it so they can run off to the patent office. Well they are in for shock then would you say? On the flip side if the technology is already "owned" it gives serious credibility to the device as 100% real even for those that had any doubts.

I would love to clarify many things and shut off all this questions but I am not in the position to do it.
I have made a big mistake without any intention and that turned back to me, but this is life, we all do mistakes, now is done and must move on.
At the begining I had no ideea what is happening and I was scared to dead, cannot explain that, many are brave and laughing, I am not. Since then I had more understanding, talked to some people and understood what is all about.
Is a chain where everyone has pressure fom the other one and I got in the chain without having any ideea.That time I was making arangements for Stefan to come here from Germany and see it working or I go there. I had this discussions privately but somwhere was a leak and russhed things up.Then we had Baroutologos who made a big mistake and that was all. Baroutologos was in private discussions with me for a long time and we exchanged info and talked about many things. I know he had no intention to do any harm but when he realised was too late.
There are so many patents that have full details and still not replicated by anyone.
We all tried at one point the simple adams motor/generator but I cannot see anyone saying that could make that one OU even if is stated as a lot of COP, should be easy, there are not too many components and still I cannot see any video anywhere.

All the best,
Romero

plengo · June 21, 2011, 11:08:25 AM

Quote from: romerouk on June 21, 2011, 10:40:28 AM^{^{@plengo
I would not delete any posts and leave them as they are, there will be a time when things will completely change and we don't need to remove or hate the people talking against our builds, most of them have good intentions but did not understand it yet.
Regarding this replication, I can see things better than anyone and at least 2 people are on the right spot, realised that and stopped anymore info.I know that one of them will release all info once he is very sure about the results.
In the end I am not the moderator but I will only remove posts where people are using very bad or nasty words.
Just start another tread and lock this one, people should still be able to go back and read all posts if they wish.
Regards,
Romero}}

^{^{Thank you Romero for this advice. I will accept it and hopefully the members will not abuse it. I will only remove from now on the irrelevant posts and rude ones.

Relevant in my opinion are subjects related to your motor, experiments, replications and possibly (with limited scope) political issues related to the history of your work. Please just correct me if you don't agree with those terms or would like to expand on it.

Off course, at the request of members (report to moderator link) I will consider removing offending posts.

Just as an example: if someone post about religion or about how they think this is a fake without any real proof, or talk about his/her concerns of the "new world order" I will delete it.

If anyone disagrees with that, please say now or be quiet for ever.

Fausto.}}

yfree · June 21, 2011, 11:10:25 AM

@All,

I am new to this forum, although an old reader of this forum. I value all the contributions by the members of this forum, especially those by Bolt and EMdevices. I would like to ask a simple question about an observation I made, when I watched the first video by Romero (not self-running). I do not understand the strange behaviour of the battery and would appreciate a help from EMdevices or Bolt or any other member, if appropriate. My observation is as follows: There are two digital multimeters connected to the input. One measures the voltage on the battery and the other measures the total current going into the device. When the device reaches a steady state, without load, the input current is 0.94 A and the battery voltage is measured at 12.59 V. When the load is connected, soon after, the current consumption decreases to 0.92 A. With the decreased current draw from the battery, the voltage on the battery should go up (less current draw should result in a smaller voltage drop across the internal resistance and the terminal voltage of the battery should increase) . However, in the video, lower current consumption under load results in voltage drop on battery terminals to 12.28 - 12.30 V. When the load is disconnected, the current draw increases again, but the voltage does not drop, as it normally should, it increases. Is there a logical explanation to this battery behaviour in this circuit? Thank you for your contributions.

Best regards to All,

yfree