Muller Dynamo

[scratchrobot]

Hi Fausto,

Do it.  we have  over 200 pages of info and NO working replications,  I personally don't need any more BS or noise on this list, a waste of time and I am guilty as others at times.  Romero has given us a lot of good information but has NEVER said what he is looking for when he tunes the motor, and if he does show a working unit no Scopes allowed on inspection!.  Until we know what or how he eliminates Lenz, we are all dead in the water. Several of us has been able to get the rotor to speed up with load but this is not lenz elimination but balance between motor and generator output.   The questions of rotor speed/no rotor speed change with load is just totally out of the box and that appears to be the "kernal" of what/how this device works and he is NOT talking about that.  So what to do?  Keep looking?  but I am getting very near the bottom of things to try.  Several interesting things observed but not OU........what a learning experience this is and continues to be!

Ben K4ZEP

Are you sure that the speed up under load is just a balance between motor and generator output.
I am really impressed about the speed up i get and maybe if I loop it like you do? Or maybe I can put an extra generating coil in with the speed up or.... so many things to try 

Good luck

[slapper]

got some gauss readings on my little unit: http://www.youtube.com/user/knapstersky#p/a/u/0/VedH_a5M8VY

the scope readings are from a hall probe positioned just under a gen coil. real time scope shot of what happens when adding
'core' material into the bobbin while the rotor spins.

take care.

nap

[neptune]

Magluvin said something yesterday that has been playing on my mind .This business of speed up under load . As I understand it , several people have reached a point that the speed with a shorted coil installed is higher than the speed with the coil totally removed from the machine . So the shorted or loaded coil is adding momentum to the rotor . If , in a looper , the rotor is driven by driver coils , the energy to drive those coils has to come from the generator , and probably has losses due to the pulse motor being less than 100% efficient , heat lost in the driver circuits and wiring . So if we could eliminate the pulse motor altogether , and rely on the "speed up under load thing" to actually drive the rotor ,
there would be less losses in the system .Some way would be needed to spin the rotor up to speed .So , if we remove the pulse motor from the loop , we are eliminating the power needed to drive it , plus the power lost in its less than 100% efficiency .So maybe the thing we should be looking for when tuning is max speed up under load/shorting . If this is possible , we need to be careful because there is no obvious way to prevent run away and magic smoke and magnets escaping . Any comments welcome .

[citfta]

<sup>Yes, yes, yes.  Please remove all the posts that have nothing to do with the actual build or ideas about the build.  I have been reading these posts since about page 25 or so and am very tired of having to read three pages just to  get one post of real info about someone's tests or new ideas.

I am 65 years old and a retired electronics tech and a ham radio operator.  Even so I have learned a lot from several of the tests and design ideas from so many of you on this forum.  I have almost everything I need to get started on my own testing, just need to get some free time.  Keep up the great work!

Carroll</sup>

[mariuscivic]

Hello everyone!

I wanted to see the waweform of my coils.So i instaled a program that uses the pc via soundcard like an osciloscope. Never used one sa this is my first  . The signal is one picture from the gen coils and the other one from the total output after the bridge rectifier (all connected)