Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Muller Dynamo

Started by Schpankme, December 31, 2007, 10:48:41 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 21 Guests are viewing this topic.

Sonedi

I am sorry I had to log in with a new UN.

Just to tell you - its working and obviously really simple. Have a look at the diagram - only the right part. The trafo is your coil. Just put a cap in parallel with your single coil with about 3uF and instead of the CR1 you put a mosfet there - switched from a hall in syncron with the rotormags. Use very short interruptions. For CR2 you use two 4007 diod in parallel. On the output you have about 20000uF. And now you can see under load it speeds up and the output is tremendous. With the mags on the coils you get more amps. I got the idea from http://www.teslaco.com/technology.html
Now you have the out of phase manner and that's the solution.

poynt99

Quote from: neptune on July 01, 2011, 11:28:16 AM
I did a small experiment today involving bifilar windings . Someone else posted a link to a website about this . I made 3 electromagnets using 3 similar iron cores . Each magnet used the same length of wire . One was wound normally , one bifilar and one quadrifilar .The same power supply was used to test each electromagnet in turn . The strength of each was tested by seeing how many small nails it would lift . The results were as follows .
Normall wind- 4nails .
Bifilar wound - 12 nails .
Quadrifilar ,12 nails .
    Note that each electromagnet had the same core and the same Amp-turns .I was surprised that quadrifilar was no better than bifilar . This experiment seems ridiculous , but you MUST do it yourself . The implication is that by using a bifilar motor coil , you could create the same input torque for a much lower electrical input , maybe as low as one third . Got to be worth a try? But do the simple experiment first .

neptune,

It would be of great benefit to know the supply current in each case. I think you will find that for case 2 and 3, the current is higher than in case one, and hence perhaps the advantage to case 2 or 3 is only evident when you are restricted to a lower supply voltage.

.99
question everything, double check the facts, THEN decide your path...

Simple Cheap Low Power Oscillators V2.0
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=downloads;sa=view;down=248
Towards Realizing the TPU V1.4: http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=downloads;sa=view;down=217
Capacitor Energy Transfer Experiments V1.0: http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=downloads;sa=view;down=209

mikestocks2006

Quote from: neptune on July 01, 2011, 01:06:21 PM
@ Nulpoints , and also in reply to Pm from Mikestocks 2006 , 
  Bifilar in my case is as follows . Take 2 wires , A and B . Wind them "2in hand2 side by side . do not twist the wires together , and try to avoid crossed turns . All 3 electromagnets are wound single layer . Connect the start of wire a to the power supply . Connect the END of wire A to the START of wire B. Connect the connect the END of wire B to the power supply . So current flows from start of A to the end of A which is then connected to the start of B . The source makes no mention of the shape factor of the coil , but shows a similar arrangement to above . The nails I used were three-quarter inch upholstery tacks [tin tacks ]. Smaller nails would give a more accurate measurement , my tests were quick and dirty . If I can find the source I will edit it to this post shortly . You need to try it yourself .
Source:  WWW.tesla-coil-builder.com/bifilar_electromagnet.htp      I dont do links so you will have to type it .
Ok, so basically, each “layer” is progressively wound in the same direction along the axis of the core. E.g. if the core is positioned vertically, every “layer” is wound from bottom to top, then again bottom to top, instead of the normal bottom to top then top to  bottom etc.
Yes I think this was mentioned before. The current has an additional small additive component along the axis of the core instead of canceling.
Thanks
Mike

nul-points

Quote from: neptune on July 01, 2011, 01:06:21 PM
@ Nulpoints
[...]
The nails I used were three-quarter inch upholstery tacks [tin tacks ]. Smaller nails would give a more accurate measurement , my tests were quick and dirty
[...]
Source:  WWW.tesla-coil-builder.com/bifilar_electromagnet.htp

thanks, neptune

ok, so you already used small nails (giving finer definition of power) - interesting about the bi - quad results, then

your normal/bifilar diff is better than quoted on the site - they say 'double', you got 3x

i wonder if the effect holds regardless of how many layers you divide the turns into

BTW the link you gave needs an .HTM extension, not .HTP

the 'fish pedicure' ad looks interesting (go on, admit it, you didn't know fish had feet) - maybe we could treat our hero to one for his next birthday?  ;)
"To do is to be" ---  Descartes;
"To be is to do"  ---  Jean Paul Sarte;
"Do be do be do" ---  F. Sinatra

neptune

@Nul-points . Will you do us a favour and create a link please . Thanks . neptune .