Muller Dynamo

[gotoluc]

@Gotoluc

Cool, i had not seen that video before.
If you still have the apparatus, it would be maybe a nice test
to run in serial resonance and measure the voltage/current phase shift.
In series resonance there should be :



I have been trying to verify what Bolt has been suggesting
to create the condition for a power factor of zero with voltage
and current at 90 degrees phase shift by just using capacitors,
because it makes sense to me to as a possible explanation
for a negative entropy.

His suggestion:
He looks at the resonant generator coil with transmission line perspective
where standing waves create an inhomogenous voltage and current distribution.

I did not use bifilar generator coils, i am starting to think that
this is a must to prevent loading the motor.
Thrapps did use caps but his coils might be bifilar too.

Hi xenomorphlabs,

I have a few things to get out of the way so it maybe a few days or more.

I will get to it and post the results and maybe a video if it's needed

Luc

[chalamadad]

Chalamadad, I am not driving with a pulse motor system like RomeroUK presented.  I am driving the rotor with a VCR head motor on a regulated DC supply.

@Mondrasek: Alright, I wasn't sure as you were showing a driver circuit on your pics. A nicely crafted build you have there.

Truth be told, I have not yet found any correlation between increased o/p power and RPM (yet),

That is strange. I havn't made a full series of measurements as you have yet but I can clearly observe o/p voltage increasing if the rotor is spinning faster.

[chalamadad]

Hey Mond

Have you tried reverse diodes(freewheel diode) across your drive coils?   It will increase your rpm but not your input.  ;]


Just put the diode across the coil in a fashion that it wont conduct when the drive circuit is sending power to the coil.( cathode/silver bar on the +side of coil)  The diode will keep the coil on for a bit longer without drive input. This will give you more rpm.  ;]

Ive said this earlier but nobody listened. It works.

Mags

Thanks Mags, will try that.

But I am not sure it is desirable to keep the coil on longer in any case and I will tell you why: I observed Romero's rig once again and I came to the conclusion that he uses one attracting and one repelling driving coil. Remember he is using smaller magnets on the outer edge of the rotor wit one of the halls? That is the one repelling. You can tell that if you see the rotor spinning clockwise. The hall that fires with the side magnets is mounted just a little forward direction of the coil so it must repel. The really interesting thing about this is that he needed the smaller magnets to have a smaller pulse width. Why doing the additional work of mounting all the smaller magnets to the side if he could just use the large neogens as with the other hall? Timing here must be important and in this case the pulse needs to be small.

[poynt99]

After re reading your post, I have decided I agree with your stance on definitions, and have edited my site.

Cheers, 

.99

[scratchrobot]

Thanks Mags, will try that.

But I am not sure it is desirable to keep the coil on longer in any case and I will tell you why: I observed Romero's rig once again and I came to the conclusion that he uses one attracting and one repelling driving coil. Remember he is using smaller magnets on the outer edge of the rotor wit one of the halls? That is the one repelling. You can tell that if you see the rotor spinning clockwise. The hall that fires with the side magnets is mounted just a little forward direction of the coil so it must repel. The really interesting thing about this is that he needed the smaller magnets to have a smaller pulse width. Why doing the additional work of mounting all the smaller magnets to the side if he could just use the large neogens as with the other hall? Timing here must be important and in this case the pulse needs to be small.

I remember him explaining that at first he wanted to only use the small magnets for the halls but then he used the big magnets on one hall because that worked better.