Muller Dynamo

[Hope]

Hello all,   The principles here are more important in birthing this device than trial and error.   First the no back emf attraction/repulsion making the motor very efficient then the second principle is the magnetic vortex created LIKE the Green Camelot magnetic ring (minus one magnet).  This is why we have a difference between the stator magnet count and the rotor magnet count.  Please comment on this anyone so I know my posting is happening.  I CAN SHOW YOU ALL how to make this magnet vortex very strong and fast using ONLY magnets  ..... no electronics.  This will DRIVE the rotor BEYOND COP >1.  See page 309 for the diagram, it is simple.  The original magnet would swing a nail only 7 inches away but the focus magnet (same magnet) swings the nail over 7 feet away!!   an array ring of these (less one in a circle) WILL create a fast, strong magnetic vortex AND it has NO CLOGGING.   There are TWO principles at work in this motor.  Lastly USE SLOTTED ferrite cores so you can tune this puppy's coils on the fly.

[penno64]

Hi Hope,

I can recall from the very beginning, I thought to myself this is big.

I remember when first setting up my magnets and cause I did not have the bobbins or wire, I
placed the 9 ferrite cores in the stator and could not believe this thing would spin with just a slight
push. The guys had a good laugh at my expense, but, that was my own fault. I swear I thought we
had cracked Ed's flywheel.

Anyway, as I am totally pooped out on trying as many things as I could, I would be happy to see
some GOOD come out of this whole excercise.

So please, share what you know and I will give it a go. I must admit that I had trouble comprehending
you drawing back on page 309. Any finer detail would be appreciated.

Kindest Regards, Penno

[neptune]

@Mondrasek . Re Amateur Radio License . Here in the UK [ and I suspect almost all other countries ] the morse code requirement has been dropped .Personally I always loved using morse .

[xenomorphlabs]

@Baroutologos: I understand your point.
At least Romero has inspired some users to try something.
Hopefully Toranorod is onto something. So even if Romero's was indeed a fake, he pushed someone else into inventing something that works.

I would interpret it more like Lenz is being used to "distract" the south pole magnets to repulse the rotor magnet, because they will also go in attraction with the north-pole magnetized core due to Lenz.
A simulation of this situation would make it more clear and of course a YT video by Toranorod.
Here a concept drawing of Toranorod's set-up:

[mondrasek]

Don't change the coil direction, just try the cabling. Go from coil #1 - bottom to top and from there to coil #2 top to bottom.

Changing just the cabling results in a Vout before the FWBR that is just a mess of low voltage fluctuations with a very random pattern.  I believe this is simply due to the mismatch in coil and rotor mags.  The Vout of each coil should be cancelling, but due to the differences mentioned, one or the other can push a bit harder and register on the scope.  The Vout peaks were rarely as high as ~ 1 V.  In the previous bucking config this V would have been >30V ptp.

After the FWBR it was able to charge up the Dump Cap to a bit above .5 V over a long time and with no load.  Adding a load would kill that voltage immediately due to the very low level of current that was able to be pushed from the coils.

M.