Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Muller Dynamo

Started by Schpankme, December 31, 2007, 10:48:41 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 33 Guests are viewing this topic.

sinergicus

Thank you Konehead for posting your ideas ;I knew  about them but didn't tried yet.
Anyway is a little tricky and complicate stuff to using switching transistors to dump the energy in capacitors and after that to dumping that energy in second  cap and after to load...

Why to not using easy and simple method  to avoid lenz drag?

You are more experienced than me or others...please consider the reardon lenz less generator what I posted in previous post  and try  to understand it ,and if you consider to replicate...and tell us how to make it;

I tried to understand the differences between his generator and common generators configuration (interaction between coils and magnets) but cannot see any difference ;maybe you will make light in our understanding .So please help  ...I think that patent is a valuable one and must be  taken in consideration....

Now;another ideea what I found and  I have read in some books few time ago, is ,to discharging the source power (battery or big capacitor) through the load ( in our case through the motor) in 2 capacitors connected in paralel and after that ,connecting them in series and dump the charge back in the battery...

If I remember, Bedini did this in his earlier experiments...

At this page http://www.free-energy-info.com/Chapt5.html you will find a US20080030165 patent
METHOD AND DEVICE FOR SUPPLYING A LOAD WITH ELECTRIC ENERGY RECOVERY  Inventor: Bozidar Lisac
regarding what I mentioned ..

If we collect the radiant energy from the coils too and dumped  back in the battery ,I think ,we will have an over unity device...will power itself

Another thing about I want to mention, are the cores of the coils...from my readings, the common core will create drag on the rotor ;the pipe type core will create less drag on the rotor and the generator/power coils will have the same power   like the common coils with common cores...seems,the electromagnetic energy travel at the outside of the corers like electrons in conductors ,the middle of the cores will have no beneficial effect so is a waste material and create drag on the rotor..More about cores you can read here:http://www.totallyamped.net/adams/   page 4

Another thing to consider is the voltage/amp used in power coils...at the higher voltage you will have higher efficiency ;high voltage,low amp ,less heat in the cores,more power in the rotor.

Ismael Aviso used high voltage electromagnets,fragmented pulses ( Osiie Callanan  did the same technique but using simplest method -red switch in the base of the transistor ,oscillating in conjunction with power coils  ).

Regarding  high voltage electromagnets and high voltage motors you can take inspiration from these:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/25248182/Fuelless-Engine-Plans-3
http://www.scribd.com/doc/47528469/Make-your-Own-High-Voltage-Electromagnets

About  home made red switches I will make some pictures  and will post them for your inspiration, when I will have the time  ...

chalamadad

Quote from: freenergy850 on August 29, 2011, 05:34:26 AM


Zerofossilfuel has posted some Arduino code on his site that should make it easy for you adjust all parameters...
alt-nrg.org

Thanks, I have seen that. The code isn't very difficult to write so it's ok to write from scratch. I don't think his code covers all parameters because as I've said, want to check for example rapid shorting/unshorting at different frequencies. By auto-adjusting I want to either sweep a range of frequencies and then analyze output maxima or let an algorithm change parameters step-by-step in order to optimize output.

Rawbush

Quote from: chalamadad on August 29, 2011, 05:12:56 AM
@sinergicus: Thanks, these information might become very useful! Callanan states he hasn't achieved good results with electronic switching so far. I wonder if we can replicate the effect with arduino. That would be fantastic. joefre has shown nice results. (Maybe @joefre: Have you tried fast un-/shorting repeatedly over the active time? This might be a way to go. I am still waiting for components for my circuit (got the wrong mosfet driver) but this is definitely something I wanna try. Originally the idea was just to tune the on-off timing of the motor coils because with the halls alone it is impossible to set the exact pulse durations and overlapping timing. Now I want to have just one hall for triggering and compute the rest with arduino. Also that will give a nice RPM display without the use of laser tacho. Then next plan is to add some code that will self-adjust the pulse widths while running in order to let the system find the optimal settings by itself.)

Sinergicus, do you want to share how those custom reed switches can be made?

You need to visit alt-nrg.org and look for the muller page...There is a really nice sketch that allows on the fly adjustment of dutycycle and were to start the pulse. There have been a few versions now is 1.3 with keyboard input added. This is the sketch I am starting with.
Peace
rawbush

konehead

Hi all

messed around with magnets behind cores - got it up to 2020rpm now - it was 1620 yesterday. there seems to be no "logic" to those magnets behind cores...I had one magnet for each core before - it looked "right" at least  and that was the 1620rpm...but turns out this particular motor wants only 3 cores of the 5 cores on top plate to  have backing magnets, and on bottom plate its just two magnets....there are doubled up magnets (thicker) on top and just one magnet per core on bottom too...adding a magnet on a core that "doesnt want one" slows it very noticeably so I spent an hour  or so replacing and playing with the magnet possibilties unitl I found what the motor likes...
I made a identical motor too - now this one likes 4 (not 3) doubled-up magnets on top plate, and then one single magnet too so all 5 cores are "covered" on top-plate with this motor...bottom-plate likes only 3 magnets on cores down there and also just single magnet per core too like the other motor - they both seem to like "weaker" magnets on bottom plate ...again, adding a magnet to any core that "doesnt like it" slows motor pretty bad...very interesting that even identical-as-you-can-get made motor/gens will want different magnet arrays behind the cores -

chalamadad

Here is a tutorial about how to make custom reed switches: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TC8-o1jm5Zo