Muller Dynamo

[e2matrix]

mariuscivic,  I am reminded here since Romero showed up he said his best effect was somewhere between 1000 and 2000 RPM.  I don't recall exactly but seems it was around 1350 RPM.  I think you are testing luck by running such a rotor at over 9000 RPM.  Those magnets would become bullets at that speed if they break loose.  Take care. 

[Magluvin]

Played around with this last night and couldnt get speedup again yet.  Thought about it today, and I did do some adjustments the other day to the core( in/ out ) and I will try that tonight.

Im also going to try a reed switch to the gumbo.  There lots to do. There's possibilities of not switching on the reed till the mag is at tdc of the coil, giving the rotor a chance to speed up using the attraction to the core , orbo like. 


And my coil is large. It could be an issue when compared to the gaps between the magnet being small. When one mag is at the incoming edge of the coil, another mag is just leaving the other side. So getting very similar results to smaller coils is probably difficult. Maybe its why I get lockup sync and not speedup quite as easily.  I need to try all my other coils with caps to see if I missed something there.

Im also going to try filling all 16 holes in the rotor, along with trying alternate poles out. I can get speeds of over 5000 rpm being that the driver coils get to push and pull the rotor for each pulse.   The reed has to be biased with a tiny mag to only allow the reed to close with one field polarity of a rotor magnet and not the other.  ;]

I had some doubts for a while on this with a lot of failed testings before now. I feel a lot better about it all now. ;]

If any have tried and failed to get any results, try some caps and see what ya get...   

Mags

[Magluvin]

Hey Marius

There is also packaging tape that has fiberglass strands lengthwise.  2 to 4 wraps around the rotors edge should hold things together for further testing for now, and shouldnt add much to the diameter of the rotor.   ;]

It would be interesting to calculate the speed that the magnets are traveling at 9500 rpm, using the circumference to calculate.

Mags

[romerouk]

Hey Romero!  Thanks for dropping in.  Do you think we are we getting any closer with this delayed Lenz effect?  Possibly just one part of the puzzle.  Who would you say here or on Energeticforum is getting close if anyone?

Mariuscivic and toranarod  are close enough.Both will have to concentrate to get the effect at lower speed. After a certain rpm you will have no gain then again at the next step will have again and so on...

Example: if starting the effect at 1000 rpm then the gain is going to vanish at 1600rpm then we can get it again starting at 2000rpm... at one point in every cycle voltage drops down even if the rpm is going high.We are getting multiple resonance points and not all are the seme, some are better than others. This is only one example, don't take for real and start looking to have 1000rpm...
Now I am not looking to get the speedup too much, I want the rpm to stay stable at any load or short. I am going to have it confirmed when I will finish my new generator, towards the end of this month.

Romero

[lanenal]

Mariuscivic and toranarod  are close enough.Both will have to concentrate to get the effect at lower speed. After a certain rpm you will have no gain then again at the next step will have again and so on...

Example: if starting the effect at 1000 rpm then the gain is going to vanish at 1600rpm then we can get it again starting at 2000rpm... at one point in every cycle voltage drops down even if the rpm is going high.We are getting multiple resonance points and not all are the seme, some are better than others. This is only one example, don't take for real and start looking to have 1000rpm...
Now I am not looking to get the speedup too much, I want the rpm to stay stable at any load or short. I am going to have it confirmed when I will finish my new generator, towards the end of this month.

Romero

Hi Romero, good to read you again. I wonder if the input current is important too? Many here are trying to keep the input current at minimum, while I noticed in your self-running video you showed us 1 Amp! Aren't we heading in the wrong direction?