Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Muller Dynamo

Started by Schpankme, December 31, 2007, 10:48:41 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 154 Guests are viewing this topic.

T-1000

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=971tWhaY2R8 - this is where conventional scientist says "it is impossible". The same effect was used to turn Faraday motor+generator into self running machine plus giving mechanical power to run conventional generator..


DeepCut

Quote from: synchro1 on December 15, 2012, 08:51:59 AM
@DeepCut,

              You're below the "Lenz Propulsion" threshold. Two coils create less Lenz drag then one in your setup. It's wrong to infer that two coils will create more "Lenz Propulsion" then one based on your experiment. Two shorted coils do not generate enough propulsion to exceed the open rotor speed, which shows they're still creating Lenz "drag", but add advantage over one. That's significant in itself, but I don't think it's fair to extrapolate based on that data. The two coils have not yet maximized the propulsion potential. My results indicate the potential's limited. Maybe you could repeat the experiment to see if the second coil accelerates the rotor over the threshold. That's the result we're interested in.

Yes, it's the fact that it's an advantage over one that i was emphasising, but you're right, it's unfair to extrapolate further.

Cheers,

DC.

Scorch

12/16/12

Just stepping for a quick update.
Haven't done anything in a while.

My current direction-
-Going to fabricate a new rotor with goal to be less wobbly and will use N45 magnets, instead of N42, and magnets are on order.
-Going to fabricate a magnetic timing rotor for use with hall sensor. Will be 1/4" thick acrylic disk with 1/8' X 1/8" neo disks.
-Will first try simple hall circuit then, maybe, graduate to an arduino controller. Want analog controls like quanta magnetics has.
-Going to stick with air coil stators, for now, but do have the materials to build new stators with ferrite cores.

That is all for now.
Hope to get some work done within the next few weeks.

Happy holidays.

}:>


Scorch

12/23/12

Completed some more fabrication this weekend.

Built a new rotor with significantly less wobble and stronger magnets.
Replaced the terminal blocks in favor of flat bottom terminal blocks which work better with mounting tape.

And fabricated a new timing disk.
The plan is to just use the original hall circuit, as per beginning of this thread, but will have the ability to adjust timing while running and can also try different sized magnets in different timing disks to change parameters such as "on time".

But; I am wondering, short of upgrading to an Arduino controller, and trying to keep it as simple as possible, isn't it possible to add a "time delay" to the TIP42C in order to change 'on' time? Needs to stay simple such as a capacitor and potentiometer or some such thing.

PS: Timing magnets are 1/8" diameter X 1/8" high in this particular disk.
Which is just another 1/4" Thick X 4" Diameter acrylic disk with 1/2" hub.

}:>


T-1000

Quote from: Scorch on December 23, 2012, 05:48:59 PM
The plan is to just use the original hall circuit, as per beginning of this thread, but will have the ability to adjust timing while running and can also try different sized magnets in different timing disks to change parameters such as "on time".

You might check on Time Delay Circuits in http://home.cogeco.ca/~rpaisley4/Comparators.html for ideas ;)