Working Magnetic Motor on you tube??

[RunningBare]

Can somebody please give reference to where there are additional magnets on the dampers?

[leeanderthal]

I don't believe that the rotor in Al's 3rd video was moving at a very high speed.  If the strobe was set for 4620 pulses/minute and not 4620 rpm's then the rotor would have to be spinning at a speed of less than 577 rpms (4620/8).  If the rotor speed was exactly 577.5 it would appear to be standing still.

[Omnibus]

@MeggerMan,

I have the results for the vertical repulsion of the batch of 12 new N42 1/4"OD x 1/2" rod magnets. The separation is between 31mm and 31.5mm both ways. Same as yours. I don't have these magnets with me right now. Hope to have them soon here so that I can measure this myself as well as the kgauss on both sides and also try them in my rig.

The measurement of N42 Ring 1/2" x 3/16" x 1/4 (with bearing) repulsion to N?? 1/4"OD x 1/2" rod has to be discussed more so that our results match those of @alsetalokin. That's an even more important measurement than the above.

Forgot to mention--all rotor magnets are 3g each.

[evil-doer]

I don't believe that the rotor in Al's 3rd video was moving at a very high speed.  If the strobe was set for 4620 pulses/minute and not 4620 rpm's then the rotor would have to be spinning at a speed of less than 577 rpms (4620/8).  If the rotor speed was exactly 577.5 it would appear to be standing still.

the strobe is NOT in sync with the rotor per full rotation, you are seeing 4 different magnets in each location. the same as you see 4 positions of the tape. this is why you can see the magnets are not positioned equally in one of the slots. the question is.. does this help or hamper the device? if they were more even would it go faster or longer, or would it not work at all?

[RunningBare]

I don't believe that the rotor in Al's 3rd video was moving at a very high speed.  If the strobe was set for 4620 pulses/minute and not 4620 rpm's then the rotor would have to be spinning at a speed of less than 577 rpms (4620/8).  If the rotor speed was exactly 577.5 it would appear to be standing still.

I thought that at first, but look at the relective strip on the rotor, it only shows up in 4 positions, which would make it 1155 RPM.