Working Magnetic Motor on you tube??

[Omnibus]

@vipond50,

Thanks a lot. Your setup is beautifully made and I hope you'll meet with success soon. I should also repeat something I've said many times before--it is quite usual when doing scientific research to encounter difficulties when reproducing previous results. Sometimes it takes months if not years to do that. This is common for standard research, let alone for research of such unusual nature as the current one.

[cub3]

@cub3,

It doesn't seem that you're continuing anything to this thread. if you continue with your useless rantings I have no choice but to ignore you.

The red Weight is still a pulley!! My point earlier about Observation. And Bill the bracket on Lhs holding other pulley.

The blind lead the blind.

Youre collective egos ignored.

Learn to read.

Regards
Den

[Omnibus]

@cub3,

It doesn't seem that you're continuing anything to this thread. if you continue with your useless rantings I have no choice but to ignore you.

The red Weight is still a pulley!! My point earlier about Observation. And Bill the bracket on Lhs holding other pulley.

The blind lead the blind.

Youre collective egos ignored.

Learn to read.

Regards
Den

What is that supposed to mean? That red piece doesn't play the role of a pulley in the video. Or you have evidence that it does? Where is the evidence?

[Lakes]

@cub3,

It doesn't seem that you're continuing anything to this thread. if you continue with your useless rantings I have no choice but to ignore you.

The red Weight is still a pulley!! My point earlier about Observation. And Bill the bracket on Lhs holding other pulley.

The blind lead the blind.

Youre collective egos ignored.

Learn to read.

Regards
Den

Cub you are bringing nothing to this thread with your ranting, if people want to do their own experiments then thats up to them, its their time and effort involved after all, how about YOU do something constructive??

[dingbat]

Cub,

Following your logic, every internal combustion engine would have to be the exact same bore, stroke, number of cylinders, etc.

I pretty much disagree with your thinking.  If "the effect" is so hard to duplicate that the planets have to align to produce it, it is not of much use.  Internal combustion is a legitimate "effect" that can be harnessed in any number of configuration that vary all over the place.  This "effect" should be reproducible in any number of configurations as well, if it is real.

If this supposed "effect" exists, there will be a wide range of values that will produce it, similar to the wide range of electric motors and gasoline motors, or other such devices that work on other "effects".

While Al's original video is impressive, I think it was faked.  I think many of the replications are already close enough that someone should have produced some degree of success by now, and they really haven't.  (in spite of what Sterling Allen calls success).  There has been nothing demonstrated other than the original video that gives any credible evidence that this system can work.  Only very subjective statements like " it seemed to accelerate", etc.  There are no numbers yet to support any degree of success.  Doesn't mean I think people should quit trying yet, but I am pretty skeptical at this point.

If you follow this stuff at all, you will recognize the pattern that is going on here.  The last big one was the bedini "Mike" window motor about a year ago.  It followed the same pattern.  A "working" demo.  A lot of hype.  Lots of attempted replications.  The original "inventor" drops off the face of the earth.  The conspiracy theories about why he disappeared (anything but it was a fake in the first place).  A lot of talk about how difficult it will be to produce the replication.  Fighting over exact component specifications (that really shouldn't matter).  Soon will come the credible evidence that the original video was a fake (because it probably was).  The after a while things die down, because the next big one is taking off.  It gets old after a while.