Working Magnetic Motor on you tube??

[Grimer]

It's nice to see a real engineering drawing for a change.  

Sure is  . Took me back half a century to sharpening my H pencil on a sanding block.
But you've probably never seen on of those. 

Or perhaps scratching India ink with a razor blade of the transparent paper and rubbing the spot with a little soap so you could draw a new line without it running??

Hans von Lieven

That really took me back. Fortunately I had a Graphos pen and didn't have to rely on the more primitive type which looked like a wading birds beak. We also had some damn tough tracing sheet material so one wasn't in danger of scraping a hole in it. Probably why we never had to resort to soap.
I kept as far away from that as possible in those days. Still do to be quite honest,

[Grimer]

...
Doug didn't have this problem because he's going 1.5-scale.  However, when the magnets arrived, the bill was like $600.  It turns out that rather than ordering 1 pack of 10, and one pack of 5, they ordered 10 packs of 10 and 5 packs of 5; so they're loaded with magnets.

A relation of mine in Belgium was ordering some stuff and he forgot the decimal point, Instead of one box a complete lorry load turned up.

[Jdo300]

Jason, I posted your questions about the rotor axle design in a location where alsetalokin will see them:
http://www.steorn.com/forum/comments.php?DiscussionID=59687&page=29#Item_29

(Side note to Steorn forum members:  if you have 'whispers' (private messages) in a particular thread in that forum, then a url intended to take you to a certain post will take you to the wrong post; if you sign off the url will take you to the correct location.)

Hi Oak,

Thanks for posting that for me. I'll be very interested to see what Al comes back with.

God Bless,
Jason O

[SoeN]

   I      II     III      IV     V     VI    VII    VIII      
5240 5273 5283 5292    5298 5334 5338 5360 rpm stator
1311 1317 1319 1322 1328 1334 1315 1340 rpm  rotor
3.99  4.00  4.00  4.00  3.99  3.99  4.06   4     ratio   

the magic number 4

I believe some one who had Inventor software or a kind of, could making a simulation, using ratio 4:1 of stator:rotor instead of using strobo light to the working unit.

Please....

[schoolboy2000]

Hi everyone !

I've been following this thread for a while and thought I'd jump in and say something real quick. First, I hope all the replicators have great success, I am really looking forward to their finished rigs and videos. Second, and more importantly, regarding a comment made by Sterling Alan:

"I would encourage those who are able to work on improvements which they can then patent and take to market.  Doug will likely be one who will do that."

As a proponent and obvious believer in free energy, I find it troubling that Sterling was the first to mention anything about patents, as it relates to financial windfalls. I am so proud of Al and OC for keeping their work open and believe that even mentioning $$ at this point is kind of counterproductive. I will say that Sterling has also made an effort to contribute to the project but I hope we all realize that the repercussions of a successful replication(s) are of great importance to all electric consumers and keeping the technology open and free will set us all free from the constraints of big business, namely the oil and ultimately the utility companies. There's nothing wrong with someone making a profit from an original idea I guess but already talking about patenting "improvements" to a fledgling technology\process\idea just doesn't sit right with me. Just my 2 cents and feel free to move this post to a dedicated topic such as open vs. patent if the moderators so choose to in their infinite wisdom.

Again, thanks Al and OC for bringing hope back to the hopeful, thanks to all that have spent time contributing, and good luck to all attempting to replicate !

Schoolboy