Working Magnetic Motor on you tube??

[Omnibus]

@vipon50,

Thanks. Hopefully I'll also have some quantitative results then to compare notes.

[vipond50]

Bill,

This device is different from the original OC concept. Once OC saw this in operation, he felt an equal distribution of stators would be desired, rather than the odd-13 arrangement from his original idea.

Running multi-stators in this un-equal arrangement may be a dead end.

I think the 4-1 ration has been established, and my thought is that 4-1 will hard to maintain with an un-equal arrangment (ie. stators interacting with the rotor in a way that inhibits the other stators)

It is obviously working for you, but they may be fighting each other.

Good Day Ken
Sorry to be dense on this, so Al changed the 13 count to what ? Sorry

Bill

[Omnibus]

Bill,

This device is different from the original OC concept. Once OC saw this in operation, he felt an equal distribution of stators would be desired, rather than the odd-13 arrangement from his original idea.

Running multi-stators in this un-equal arrangement may be a dead end.

I think the 4-1 ration has been established, and my thought is that 4-1 will hard to maintain with an un-equal arrangment (ie. stators interacting with the rotor in a way that inhibits the other stators)

It is obviously working for you, but they may be fighting each other.

OC's opinion is utterly unimportant. What we need to know is what @alsetalokin did in his video. Was the base there made for 13 stators or not? I think we all here presume it was the 13-stator base and Jason's drawings reflect that.

Recall, Jason sent him the drawings and he approved of the 13-stator base.

[vipond50]

Bill,

This device is different from the original OC concept. Once OC saw this in operation, he felt an equal distribution of stators would be desired, rather than the odd-13 arrangement from his original idea.

Running multi-stators in this un-equal arrangement may be a dead end.

I think the 4-1 ration has been established, and my thought is that 4-1 will hard to maintain with an un-equal arrangment (ie. stators interacting with the rotor in a way that inhibits the other stators)

It is obviously working for you, but they may be fighting each other.

OC's opinion is utterly unimportant. What we need to know is what @alsetalokin did in his video. Was the base there made for 13 stators or not? I think we all here presume it was the 13-stator base and Jason's drawings reflect that.

Recall, Jason sent him the drawings and he approved of the 13-stator base.

Yep I concur and that what my Dwg's reflect also.
The Video was to show that all three stators can and will operate at any given time. When the device operated this morning" the one minute run" it was with one Stator in sync and the other two were running gear wise.

Thanks
Bill

[geodan]

repost from steorn to my request for a translation...

"    *
      CommentAuthorDirtfarmer
    * CommentTime1 minute ago

permalinkquote
@geodanz...
...Implies an asymmetric field for reasons unknown... The "symettry" traces show the uninterfered waveforms, of rotor and stator, but the dual trace shows quite a different trace for "upspin", and "downspin" (als' parlance...)
Intriguing.
Goodwill,
-Dirtfarmer