Working Magnetic Motor on you tube??

[ken_nyus]

@ken_nyus,

That's strange, because, as you probably know, my experience with Liquid Wrench is just the opposite...

I know omni, I read your reports and others who said the same. I was expecting even better results, but I found the opposite. I will eventually play with that bearing again and give it another chance.

I was also surprised that Liquid Wrench was not what I remembered it to be, last time I used Liquid Wrench (which might have been 20 years ago) I thought it was in a small squeeze oil can, but what I got at the hardware store was in a spray can, and was a very black solvent smelling stuff.

Did you re-oil the bearings after using the Liquid Wrench or leave them as-is after?

[Omnibus]

@ken_nyus,

That's strange, because, as you probably know, my experience with Liquid Wrench is just the opposite...

I know omni, I read your reports and others who said the same. I was expecting even better results, but I found the opposite. I will eventually play with that bearing again and give it another chance.

I was also surprised that Liquid Wrench was not what I remembered it to be, last time I used Liquid Wrench (which might have been 20 years ago) I thought it was in a small squeeze oil can, but what I got at the hardware store was in a spray can, and was a very black solvent smelling stuff.

Did you re-oil the bearings after using the Liquid Wrench or leave them as-is after?

My Liquid Wrench is also in a spray bottle but is clear. Once you apply it it works very well. Then, if it stays for a whole (several hours) it somehow loses the effect and you have to apply it anew. I tried other lubricants but they worsened the effect. I'm talking about the stator. Applying Liquid Wrench to the rotor made things worse (AGW couldn't be achieved), so I had to reverse to a regular lubricant.

[sm0ky2]

Seems that there has to be a retardation that bounces back and forth between the rotor and the stator (stators). Some kind of self-sustaining ping pong effect. Like the juggler, passing the rings from one hand to the other, never allowing them to fall on the ground. The juggler spends energy for this purpose. In this case we have force fields which are a given and they can assist each other in moving spatially the object they are acting upon periodically transferring the responsibility from one field to the other (if the timing happens to be right).

Thats a lot like the "awakening" i had when i watched the stroboscopic video.....
"synchronized" is the entirely wrong concept for this device.
operationaly, it must be UN-synchronized.
But to what degree?  - i think this is the key to unlocking its power.
once this is understood, the other minute factors -
:::like how many mm between your stator and your para-magneto-kenetic-junsen-flapers
will become irrelevant.

[Omnibus]

Seems that there has to be a retardation that bounces back and forth between the rotor and the stator (stators). Some kind of self-sustaining ping pong effect. Like the juggler, passing the rings from one hand to the other, never allowing them to fall on the ground. The juggler spends energy for this purpose. In this case we have force fields which are a given and they can assist each other in moving spatially the object they are acting upon periodically transferring the responsibility from one field to the other (if the timing happens to be right).

Thats a lot like the "awakening" i had when i watched the stroboscopic video.....
"synchronized" is the entirely wrong concept for this device.
operationaly, it must be UN-synchronized.
But to what degree?  - i think this is the key to unlocking its power.
once this is understood, the other minute factors -
:::like how many mm between your stator and your para-magneto-kenetic-junsen-flapers
will become irrelevant.

Can't agree more. That's why we have to work towards understanding that un-synchronization and I'm listening to what you or @Grimer or @Harvey have to say in trying to put together some rational picture of what might be the nature of this effect. One small advance was maybe the proposal I put forth of the difference in the H'-B' loops, based on @Grimer's idea about the unconventional hysteresis. More is needed, though. I guess, if we could get a correct grasp of what is happening, that will aid us in conducting the experiments in the right direction. So far we're still shooting in the dark.

[Arlo#1]

what is the square thing on the side of the rotor two magnets clockwise from the painted stripe. It looks like it just covers one poll of the magnet in that location and is it posible to be something sheilding the poll in that location?