Working Magnetic Motor on you tube??

[Omnibus]

@JFK,

You won't go away because you're impudent.

As far as from where you sit you cannot say the same for me. I have contributed substantially to this area proving beyond a shadow of a doubt that CoE can be violated. What have you done? Nothing. Just imposing your impudence on the forum.

[Omnibus]

The idiot @alsetalokin must be condemned loud and clear and I will not tolerate any attempt  for advocacy, as @JFK is trying amateurishly to do.

What @alsetalokin has done to the community is the worst offense it can ever experience. It's worse than cursing and using expletives. He should be shown clearly that he is in a disrepute and the sooner forums ban (by IP) him and the like, the better for the progress of the questions at hand.

[JFK]

So why don't you go to a forum in which Al participates in to chastise him ?

Personally I have learned a lot from this thread... From Clanzer and Yada mostly, and I have learned absolutely nothing from your rants.

Even if the OCPMM is a hoax as you proclaim it to be, there WERE unique effects learned of and need to be studied here which may or may not be applicable to future endeavours.

Your shortsightness totally amazes me.... unless of course my first impression of you was correct... that you are merely a know it all troll.

[Omnibus]

Like I said, I've made one of the most important contributions in this field. I have proved for the first time in a scientifically rigorous way that CoE can be violated. This is a discovery with far-reaching consequences which assures without a doubt that a magnetic motor can be built in principle. That discovery nullifies assertions of not well qualified people such as @alsetalokin that OU is impossible.

As it concerns the progress regarding the engineering problem of building a magnetic motor, sadly, now we are at the same point as we have been a decade ago. I should mention, however, that I got involved in this for only about two years, at that only due to the mentioned discovery for CoE violation. This is the only thing that is keeping my interest in this field and quite rightfully so. During these two years I've seen a lot of dishonesty, games, finagling, stupidity, arrogant incompetence and so on. Like I said, @alsetalokin's is one of the worst and I strongly suspect foul play from certain organizations with vested interests..

Understand, before independent parties can reproduce a self-starting device making full turns on its own absolutely no success can be claimed neither can it have any educational value. All the different devices display problems of exactly same character which are very well known by now. I know, science is cruel. Therefore, the arrogant approach of a superstar @alsetalokin displays is completely out of whack. Unfortunately, there are people who are falling for that but, as I said, I'll take care this to happen as rarely as possible.

As for why I don't participate in the fizzx forum where @alsetalokin writes the main reason is that I find this present forum as the best for discussing these matters with the most enthusiastic and capable participant (with some exceptions, how else). I'd like to stay focused and not spread out too thin, not following who's responding where and when. As for @CLaNZeR, @Yadaraf, @Craigy, @klicUK, @Jdo300, @tao and many others, I can't agree more. Some of them are superb researchers and this gives me hope, knowing that CoE can be violated without a doubt, that we'll see that soon clothed in working engineering solution of a magnetic motor.

[JFK]

neither can it have any educational value .

I totally disagree with that statement.  You have learned absolutely nothing from the AGW cyclic ( for lack of a better term ) rotation of the stator ?

Edit - Apparently you can't bold text in quotes here. :\