Thane Heins Perepiteia.

[JustMe]

The question was directed at Thane. He told us that all results are reviewed on a daily basis by Dr Habash. I was looking for confirmation of that for these particular results because I was surprised that they would pass muster with Dr Habash since they are completely obscured by the margin of experimental error.

PB

The question was (oddly and uselessly) directed at me.

These results have never been presented as outside the margin of error, as you know full well. You and JackSatan have laid down exponentially more blather on this than anbody else here - most observers are just remaining appropriately reserved until this shakes out one way or the other.

In my opinion, the right meter for you will be the one that stops saying there might be something different going on whether it's a 'Fluke 287 True-rms Electronics Logging Multimeter with TrendCapture' or one that comes free with an econosize tub of crazy from Lee Valley.  It's clear that despite your lip service to open mindedness you decided what all the answers to these kinds of questions must be long ago, as have many other intelligent people. So if there's anything to be discovered here, it's not going to be discovered through you. 

[JustMe]

TO BE HONEST I DID NOT POST THIS LATEST PHOTO-DATA BECAUSE I AM LOOKING FOR VALIDATION...

I POSTED IT BECAUSE I WANTED TO GIVE THE FAULTFINDERS ON THIS THREAD A SOAP BOX.

THE REALITY IS LAST WEEK LUC AND I STRUGGLED AROUND THE 50 -60% EFFICIENCY RANGE - THIS WEEK WE ARE IN THE 90 - 110 RANGE.

IN MY VIEW THIS SHOULD BE CAUSE FOR CELEBRATION FOR LUC'S SINCERE EFFORTS - for the improvement NOT THE ACTUAL EFFICIENCY PERCENTAGE BUT INSTEAD IT IS MET WITH DERISION.

IT IS A SAD COMMENTARY.

Thane

Hopefully it goes without saying that the hard work and dedication of all involved is very much appreciated by most of the people following this thread whether those people participate or not, no matter what the end result. Please continue to post your results.

[OilBarren]

TO BE HONEST I DID NOT POST THIS LATEST PHOTO-DATA BECAUSE I AM LOOKING FOR VALIDATION...

I POSTED IT BECAUSE I WANTED TO GIVE THE FAULTFINDERS ON THIS THREAD A SOAP BOX.

THE REALITY IS LAST WEEK LUC AND I STRUGGLED AROUND THE 50 -60% EFFICIENCY RANGE - THIS WEEK WE ARE IN THE 90 - 110 RANGE.

IN MY VIEW THIS SHOULD BE CAUSE FOR CELEBRATION FOR LUC'S SINCERE EFFORTS - for the improvement NOT THE ACTUAL EFFICIENCY PERCENTAGE BUT INSTEAD IT IS MET WITH DERISION.

IT IS A SAD COMMENTARY.

Thane

Thane, is there a specific timeframe you're sticking to in this development?
Like, when are you thinking of getting round to closing the loop on your device and eventually mount one in the buggy?
Considering that you suspect OU has been achieved it would eem logical to close the loop and make the whole shebang selfrunning soon right?

WE ARE IN THE PROCESS OF TESTING DIFFERENT MOTORS FOR THE DUNE BUGGY AS WELL AS COILS, WIRE GUAGE, CORE MATERIAL ETC, ETC. WE HOPE TO HAVE THE DUNE BUGGY UP AND RUNNING WITHIN 3 MONTHS TIME.

AS FAR AS SELF RUNNING - WE ARE DOING OUR BEST - BUT WE WOULD BE EXTREMELY HAPPY WITH EXTENDING THE ELECTRIC VEHICLE'S RANGE BY JUST 50%.

Thane

[OilBarren]

I FORGOT TO MENTION THAT MAGMETALS INC HAS SUPPLIED LUC WITH TWO TOROID CORES WITH A RELATIVE PERMEABILITY OF 200,000 - THE ONES WE ARE CURRENTLY USING ARE 17,000.

I believe you said the other ones were professionaly wound...will that be the case this time?

PERHAPS YES - GOOD IDEA ACTUALLY - TOROID TECH INC. SUPPLIED US WITH THE ONES WE ARE CURRENTLY USING SO I WILL ASK THEM WHEN THET VISIT - TO WIND THEM FOR US.

Thane

[bitbeam]

I too want to thank Thane, Luc, Aether22 and all the others that are actually making an effort here! If it weren't for people like you nothing would change in this world, you are all heros in my eyes, even if it turns out that we are all delusional!  

Aaron