Thane Heins Perepiteia.

[hoptoad]

Need a "one pager" from you -- explaining in SIMPLE, NON-TECHNICAL language (for my producers -- no Ohms, Reluctance, etc., etc.) WHAT you believe you have discovered.  WHY this is unique.

@RCH

As I've pointed out on numerous occasions, Thane did not discover this, he has merely rediscovered what has already been known for some time.
It isn't unique, but it is useful. How do I know? Because I've been there and done that!

See pages 8 and 10 at this site: http://www.totallyamped.net/adams

Note the date of publication of the information and understand that it is based on experimental work performed in 2001-2002. Also note that the information presented was never meant to fully explain the nature and reason for this effect, but to be a concise guideline for anyone wishing to replicate it themselves.

In spite of giving Thane some direction on the parameters required for this non linear effect, he hasn't even bothered to read (according to his own postings) any of the information I've already volunteered to him about it. Strange for a person who is supposedly seeking the truth about this effect. One would think that any prior information regarding this would be welcome, but Thane seems quite content to re hash that which is already known, whilst postulating unlikely theories regarding electrostatic versus electromagnetic properties of differing coils, as being the cause of the effect ??


Cheers.

[RCH]

Need a "one pager" from you -- explaining in SIMPLE, NON-TECHNICAL language (for my producers -- no Ohms, Reluctance, etc., etc.) WHAT you believe you have discovered.  WHY this is unique.

@RCH

As I've pointed out on numerous occasions, Thane did not discover this, he has merely rediscovered what has already been known for some time.

It isn't unique, but it is useful. How do I know? Because I've been there and done that!

See pages 8 and 10 at this site: http://www.totallyamped.net/adams ....

Cheers.

Hoptoad ,

(For the record, I'm NOT a fan of silly webnames in serious conversations ... but that's just me ....)

All that may be true -- and totally irrelevant at this point.

Remember the part earlier, where I described "Coast" (paraphrasing) as "a place where guests are invited on to tell their STORIES ... with whatever supporting evidence they want to present?" 

Well, part of Thane's exciting "story" is the fact that he has a current, viable, "anomalous" working technology to showcase (readily available to see via the Internet); that he's been invited to present live demos of that technology to a number of important media and scientific institutions; and, that he has now found a current "home" for on-going experimental/development work on that technology at a major University ... which is enabling him to attempt to advance to the next important step "at light speed":

A practical demonstration of that "anomalous technology" ... an actual, electric "extended range vehicle."

That's a pretty interesting story ... even to this point.         

If and when Thane appears as an actual  guest on "Coast" -- and relates the details of THAT story for ~3 hours to our audience -- some of the additional details that will be asked of him (in front of several million listeners ...) will be my original questions:

"What makes your (Thane's) discovery unique (if it is ...)?"

And--

"How do you think it works?"

If Thane can't (or won't) answer those questions honestly, to the best of his ability -- including citing prior work (if any ...) -- than THAT response (or lack of it ...) will ALSO become part of his developing public story ... won't it?

And, during the program, you (and other knowledgable folks) will get a chance to either call in live, send e-mails to the host during the interview, or have ME provide appropriate background documentation of any "prior art" beforehand.

"Coast" is a place and a format where ALL the relevant information will come out -- live.

From my reading of all ~1700 plus posts in this thread over several days (!), and understanding EXACTLY what Thane and Luc are going through in terms of public pressure at this point, I have every confidence that Thane will ultimately do the right thing when his "15 minutes" arrives ....

Thane's public success (if it develops ...) will also become a vehicle for showcasing a lot of OTHER "anomalous technologies" -- if not their equally deserving inventors -- along the way.

So, my suggestion is: relax ....       


RCH

[JustMe]

It isn't unique, but it is useful.

It's not useful if it's essentially been abandoned in a garden shed or whatever a thousand miles away. It's not useful parked on a webpage. Thane is trying to make whatever he has discovered - or rediscovered - into something useful.  That's why the focus, for better or for worse, is on his project.  I wish him every success.

[AbbaRue]

I don't understand hoptoad's point either.
This forum is full from top to bottom of projects seeking to duplicate pioneers in the alternative energy field.
In fact almost everything on this website is based on replication of someone else's technology.
Be it Tesla, stubblefield, bedini, Marks tpu, John Hutchisons crystal Cell.
We are all building on the foundation of these pioneers.

God is always willing to give us the answers, we just aren't listening, remember everything He does is based around faith.
Listen for that small still voice that tells you what to try next.  Just listen.  You hear that, now try it.

Keep up the great work.

[hoptoad]

It isn't unique, but it is useful.

It's not useful if it's essentially been abandoned in a garden shed or whatever a thousand miles away. It's not useful parked on a webpage. Thane is trying to make whatever he has discovered - or rediscovered - into something useful.  That's why the focus, for better or for worse, is on his project.  I wish him every success.

Information is always useful, especially when its freely and openly made available to all and any interested parties, as is the case when posted in an  unrestricted open web page. I'm simply puzzled that Thane doesn't seem to be interested in prior knowlege. Navigating your way to the next stage is always easier when you understand where you're currently at, and how you got there.

I have already on a number of occasions wished Thane success, and I still do and will continue to do so.
I just fail to see why he would ignore prior knowledge and information of any sort, that may further aid his progress.

Cheers