Thane Heins Perepiteia.

[gotoluc]

Hi All,

Between the writing of Aspden, Laithwaite and DePalma, it would take a good year to read and understand the mountain of information (especially Aspden). The main researchers (Thane and Luc) are get er done type of guys and would never have time to sift thru that mountain for pertaining information. Would any you who are more studied on these individual, like to volunteer a summary document of important information, pertaining to Thane's research? It could be coordinated, if each volunteer stated the document that they have time to create. You don't need all or perfect knowledge, just enough to contribute to the process.

Thanks,
Larry

Good Call Larry,

I ain't the reading of documentation type of guy, so if anyone can help as Larry is suggesting that would be great.

Great work to date Larry

@aether22, I'm glad to see you're back. Also keep in mind that you can use old microwave transformers to test the effect. With a angle grinder and a thin cut off blade you can have a coil done in about 20 minutes.

Luc

P.S. I'll be back from Florida on the 10th and will resume with more tests to find the better coil setup.

[aether22]

Aether!

Yes, some of us have been concerned by your prolonged absence ....           

However, I find your remarks -- on "reappearing" -- somewhat puzzling.

I have always been struck by how even those at one of the true "outer boundaries" of human knowledge -- as in, ultimately believing in even the possibility of "an unlimited source of free energy" -- seem to, in fact, have other boundary issues ... such as, not being able to seriously consider the political (and legal) possibility that NASA "may NOT have been telling us the whole truth all these years, regarding what is really on the Moon" ....

I think it's the difference between thinking something is possible or theoretically likely .vs actually believing the consequences of those beliefs.
I have no trouble with NASA lying (I am positive they do), but them having taken a picture of a robot resembling a humanoid lying in a creator seems too fantastic, not to say that I disbelieve any of the things possible for such to be reality, it is simply being faced with such a reality, and furthermore when the evidence is of a grainy photo type, I may not be able to explain away the evidence for C3PO or the glass structures and I may even consider it strong from a certain perspective but it somehow isn't satisfying even if I accept it's proof.

I guess we all have different ways by which evidence can sway us, some in correlations, some in authority, some in mathematical verification, some in grainy photos, and the impact evidence has on us might have little to do with logic.

Or, to also seriously consider that 19th Century British biologist, J.B.S. Haldane, could have been absolutely right when he stated decades ago--

"It is my supposition that the Universe is not only queerer than we imagine ... is queerer than we CAN imagine ...."

I believe that too.
I think one thing though is different levels of belief, some things I believe are so, others I believe are not so, and many things I say I don't know, and this "don't know" covers everything that I have not been utterly convinced about in either direction, many I might believe mostly, things that are very probably the truth, others I may accept have evidence but feel they are lacking solidity or sometimes simply too 'uncomfortable' to consider as an everyday reality, some things simply take more time, evidence and discomfort to accept.

http://www.csmngt.com/quote_11.htm

In that kind of Universe, is it REALLY any "queerer" to imagine an "unlimited source of free energy," blatantly violating the current (narrowly-defined) Second Law of Thermodynamics (because it ultimately comes from outside the currently defined "Universe" -- i.e. another "dimension?") ... than to consider equally robust, officially acquired (but politically suppressed) evidence from NASA ... that Humankind is NOT alone in that same Universe?

For a long time I believed in UFO's because the evidence was great and I didn't question it.
Oh, I still believe in UFO's but I have since come to the conclusion that they can not ALL be 'ours', in other words I now believe in Aliens also.
And I believe in ancient technology human and otherwise.
I have even seen enough evidence to believe in ancient bases on the moon.
And obviously a humanoid robot isn't especially far fetched, but really, in those grainy photos?  Maybe if you had identified something more mundane say an alien table?
Anyway as you have hopefully grasped I'm not disputing your evidence just admitting some of it is hard to accept, of course it might be C3PO's head but I remain less than fully convinced simply because the evidence isn't quite convincing enough in the way I like my evidence.

But, I digress ....       

So you actually got to spend some quality time with Bruce, eh?  That's pretty cool.

Yes, sadly though he had some crazy theories about some 'primordial fluid something' and at the time I did not like the idea of anything that smelled like an aether.

I found a bunch of DePalma's older "experimental papers" the other day, that he had sent me "for safekeeping" from New Zealand shortly after he arrived.  They brought back all of the feelings I have had of late, regarding what we are now missing in these crucial fields, the fact that, in Humanity's "11th hour" -- when we REALLY need giants such as these ... DePalma, Laithwaite ... others -- they're now, sadly, gone.

Glad you're back.

RCH

Glad you joined!

[aether22]

Hi All,

Between the writing of Aspden, Laithwaite and DePalma, it would take a good year to read and understand the mountain of information (especially Aspden). The main researchers (Thane and Luc) are get er done type of guys and would never have time to sift thru that mountain for pertaining information. Would any you who are more studied on these individual, like to volunteer a summary document of important information, pertaining to Thane's research? It could be coordinated, if each volunteer stated the document that they have time to create. You don't need all or perfect knowledge, just enough to contribute to the process.

Thanks,
Larry

Good Call Larry,

I ain't the reading of documentation type of guy, so if anyone can help as Larry is suggesting that would be great.

Great work to date Larry

@aether22, I'm glad to see you're back. Also keep in mind that you can use old microwave transformers to test the effect. With a angle grinder and a thin cut off blade you can have a coil done in about 20 minutes.

Luc

P.S. I'll be back from Florida on the 10th and will resume with more tests to find the better coil setup.

Ah, is that what Thane is using, I do have one, will consider it but now I am winding.
As for the breaks it is because I have the reel on a shaft and it is spinning but sometimes the wire wraps it's self around the axle, one I didn't catch it in time, the other time I simply had the drill running a bit too fast.

[OUman]

...I reviewed DePalma Homopolar/Unipolar generator research. ... My University and High School Physics text have no mention of the homopolar generator. Apparently because it went against Lenz's law and could not be explained by modern physics...
Regards,
Larry

I think the reason you don't see it in textbooks is more straightforward than that. The reason is simply that it didn't work.

[LarryC]

Ah, is that what Thane is using, I do have one, will consider it but now I am winding.
As for the breaks it is because I have the reel on a shaft and it is spinning but sometimes the wire wraps it's self around the axle, one I didn't catch it in time, the other time I simply had the drill running a bit too fast.

Okay, but have you tried laying the wire reel on it side edge(no shaft) and pulling clockwise off the top side edge of the reel and spooling clockwise on the core? Just like loading a fishing spinning reel.

Thanks,
Larry

PS - I'm starting to believe in aether with all this research of Aspden, Laithwaite and DePalma. So maybe wellcome another to the heretic club.