Thane Heins Perepiteia.

[CRANKYpants]

Could someone tell me the addy of the other thread please?

Ron

I'M SORRY,
MY MISTAKE THAT REQUEST WAS FOR PEOPLE TO COME AND SHARE AND ASK QUESTIONS HERE - NOT THE OTHER WAY AROUND.

THANKS
Thane

[CRANKYpants]

FROM STEFAN ON YOUTUBE:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FmFbINO0dCU&feature=email

Hmm,
200 Watts input and only about 1 Watt output ?
That still could be explained all by impedance matching.

Did you get with your rotary machine already anywhere with more coils about 200 Watts output already ? Maybe use a more efficient motor like a Newman motor... Then you will maybe only use 10 Watts input power and if you connect more output coils you should get real overunity operation...
Regards, Stefan.

THIS PROJECT WAS NEVER ABOUT CREATING AN OVERUNITY DEVICE. IT WAS AND STILL IS ABOUT REDUCING THE EFFECTS OF LENZ'S LAW IN A GENERATOR.

AS YOU CAN SEE IN THE VIDEO LENZ'S LAW CAUSES THE SYSTEM TO DECELERATE WHEN ONLY THE HIGH CURRENT COILS ARE EMPLOYED AND A LOAD IS PLACED ON THE GENERATOR.

DECELERATION IS REVERSED WHEN THE HIGH VOLTAGE COILS ARE EMPLOYED THE SYSTEM ACCELERATES DESPITE THE FACT THAT THE LOAD IS STILL PRESENT.

SO AS YOU CAN SEE LEZ'S LAW HAS BEEN NEGATED.

Thane

[CRANKYpants]

DEAR ALL,

PLEASE FIND BELOW THE LINK TO PART 2 OF THE TRANSFORMER VIDEO WITH A NEW PRIMARY: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SYYfGwU60_0

IN A CONVENTIONAL TRANSFORMER THE POWER FACTOR WOULD BE 1 (FOR A PURELY RESISTIVE LOAD AS USED HERE) - MEANING THE CURRENT AND VOLTAGE ARE IN PHASE WITH EACH OTHER.

THIS TRANSFORMER IS NOT IN PHASE BECAUSE THE BRIDGE DIVERTS SOME OF THE SECONDARY BACK EMF INDUCED FLUX. THIS DIVERTED FLUX ENTERS THE OPPOSING SECONDARY IN THE SAME DIRECTION AS THE PRIMARY FLUX AND HELPS MAINTAIN THE VOLTAGE ACCROSS THE LOAD. SO NOW WE HAVE A SITUATION WHERE DIVERTED BACK EMF FLUX IS DOING "WORK" THAT WOULD OTHERWISE HAVE HAD TO BE SUPPLIED BUT THE SOURCE.

THIS DIVERTED FLUX WOULD OTHERWISE CAUSE THE PRIMARY IMPEDANCE TO DROP AND CAUSE IT TO DRAW MORE CURRENT FROM THE SOURCE.NOW IT DOESN'T HAVE TO AND THE SAVINGS CAN NOW BE APPLIED TO THE LOAD.

WITH A MORE EFFICIENT BRIDGE, SLIGHTLY LARGER WIRE, AND ADDITIONAL BI-TOROID "SPLITTING" THIS TRANSFORMER WILL CONTINUE TO IMPROVE.

CHEERS
Thane

[waterhouse24]

Nice work Thane!

Looking forward to some nice pictures of the setup.

The OU is starting to taste SWEET!

[CRANKYpants]

BEST TRANSFORMER RESULTS YET!
(same as video only lower input)

DEAR ALL,

PLEASE FIND ENCLOSED WHAT I CONSIDER THE TRANSFORMER DATA YET!
(JM WILL BE POSTING PHOTO DATA SOON).

INPUT VOLTAGE = 38.13 VOLTS
INPUT CURRENT = 0.02 AMPS
POWER FACTOR = 28.6 DEGREES OR 0.876 (USING OSCILLOSCOPE)
INPUT POWER = 0.668 WATTS

OUTPUT = 10.75 VOLTS OR 1.16 WATTS
EFFICIENCY = 174%

PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS IS NOT THE BEST "BRIDGE" BUT A MAKE SHIFT MASH-UP - HOWEVER THAT BEING SAID - EVEN IF THE POWER FACTOR WAS 1 (WHICH IT CLEARLY IS NOT) AND THE CURRENT WAS 0.03 A - IT WOULD STILL BE OVER UNITY.

TO ANSWER STEVE'S EARLIER QUESTION ABOUT HIGHER POWER - THE PRIMARY SATURATES ABOVE 0.04 AMPS.

CHEERS
Thane