Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Thane Heins Perepiteia.

Started by RunningBare, February 04, 2008, 09:02:26 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 9 Guests are viewing this topic.

Bruce_TPU

Quote from: CRANKYpants on February 24, 2009, 06:11:51 AM

snip
NOT THAT IT WOULD MATTER TO ANYONE HERE ON THE OVER-UNITY FORUM  ;) BUT IF WE CALCULATED THE POWER IN THE DRIVE SHAFT AT 25 RPM (INPUT) AND COMPARED IT TO THE POWER IN THE DRIVE SHAFT AT 3500 RPM PLUS THE 21 WATTS BEING DELIVERED TO THE LOAD (OUTPUT) WE WOULD FIND THAT WE ARE OPERATING AT OVER-UNITY.

AND FINALLY - THE TORQUE SUPPLIED BY AN INDUCTION MOTOR (and energy cost) IS A FUNCTION OF SLIP ANGLE PERCENTAGE.

AT 25 RPM SLIP ANGLE PERCENTAGE = MAXIMUM
AT 3500 RPM SLIP ANGLE PERCENTAGE = MINIMUM


SO THERE IS ACTUALLY MORE MOTOR TORQUE (AND MORE ENERGY COST) IN THE DRIVE SHAFT AT 25 RPM THAN THERE IS AT 3500 RPM.


CHEERS
T

Great job Thane,

Perhaps the above quote, with a picture, a diagram, and links to your latest youtube video would be a great first page of a new thread.  Perhaps a paragraph or two of the expansion of vision of your experimentation.  Then, after the new thread is started, lock this one, or ask Stefan to, if you are unable.  People will still be able to read this novel, but no longer post to it.  Only to the new one.

Thanks for sharing, it is appreciated!

Bruce
1.  Lindsay's Stack TPU Posted Picture.  All Wound CCW  Collectors three turns and HORIZONTAL, not vertical.

2.  3 Tube amps, sending three frequency's, each having two signals, one in-phase & one inverted 180 deg, opposing signals in each collector (via control wires). 

3.  Collector is Magnetic Loop Antenna, made of lamp chord wire, wound flat.  Inside loop is antenna, outside loop is for output.  First collector is tuned via tuned tank, to the fundamental.  Second collector is tuned tank to the second harmonic (component).  Third collector is tuned tank to the third harmonic (component)  Frequency is determined by taking the circumference frequency, reducing the size by .88 inches.  Divide this frequency by 1000, and you have your second harmonic.  Divide this by 2 and you have your fundamental.  Multiply that by 3 and you have your third harmonic component.  Tune the collectors to each of these.  Input the fundamental and two modulation frequencies, made to create replicas of the fundamental, second harmonic and the third.

4.  The three frequency's circulating in the collectors, both in phase and inverted, begin to create hundreds of thousands of created frequency's, via intermodulation, that subtract to the fundamental and its harmonics.  This is called "Catalyst".

5.  The three AC PURE sine signals, travel through the amplification stage, Nonlinear, producing the second harmonic and third.  (distortion)

6.  These signals then travel the control coils, are rectified by a full wave bridge, and then sent into the output outer loop as all positive pulsed DC.  This then becomes the output and "collects" the current.

P.S.  The Kicks are harmonic distortion with passive intermodulation.  Can't see it without a spectrum analyzer, normally unless trained to see it on a scope.

aTg

hi,

This is my new test with 0.2mm coil wire

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1JC0UwnZrcU

Lenz's law working. :(

woopy

frrrrrreeeezzzzzzzz

Saint Laurent  is not only frozen in Canada  but also in Switzerland
i have about one meter snow in front of my windows   (very nice indeed)

and  standard frozen Laurent is waiting for an answer to the graph evolution  ...

cheers

Laurent

woopy

and you know what ?


this afternoon i went to a good friend of mind ,to whom i showed your great work

and after some time he said to me   this

if  we could store the accelerating energy of the motorising HV coils  ( with or without  the HC coil  plus  or minus working )  in a very heavy    very  loose and efficient  flywheel  (let's say  2 meters diameter  and 300 kg  at 10,000 rpm rotating in vaccuum) during the night we could use this kinetical energy  back to get a smooth average  energy all day long   so in other words   coupling the rotor of the perepiteia to a very heavy fly wheel could be an interesting idea  to get constant energy output     who know's ? ;)

good night

Laurent

hoptoad

Quote from: CRANKYpants on February 24, 2009, 06:11:51 AM
NOT THAT IT WOULD MATTER TO ANYONE HERE ON THE OVER-UNITY FORUM  ;) BUT IF WE CALCULATED THE POWER IN THE DRIVE SHAFT AT 25 RPM (INPUT) AND COMPARED IT TO THE POWER IN THE DRIVE SHAFT AT 3500 RPM PLUS THE 21 WATTS BEING DELIVERED TO THE LOAD (OUTPUT) WE WOULD FIND THAT WE ARE OPERATING AT OVER-UNITY.

OU  ...... ???  without any reference to input power to the motor driving the system  ??

To be OU, your 21 watts electrical output and shaft torque (mechanical output) combined must be greater than the input power consumed by the driving motor.

Without input power data versus output power (including shaft torque measurements) data, your claim of "WE ARE OPERATING AT OVERUNITY" is extremely tenuous.

Cheers