Hello

[paulie1982]

Hi everyone,

Not sure where to introduce myself (apologies to the admin if i am in the wrong area ) but thought i might as well pick anywhere. As you can see my username is Paulie1982, some of you may know me from my perpetual motion related animations on youtube -

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lOk8i668xxE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=np9lLom16Nk .
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k0hLGL1jA_E

My story is that i am a bit of an agnostic when it comes to perpetual motion, i am stuck between two minds on the subject. On one hand i think it is possible( for various reasons) but on the other i am restrained by the cold hard laws of physics that always put you back in your place.

Anyway, nice to meet you all.

[Omnibus]

@paulie1982,

You obviously want to ask something and something is whether the second part of your sentence

On one hand i think it is possible( for various reasons) but on the other i am restrained by the cold hard laws of physics that always put you back in your place.

still holds. No, it doesn't. It has already been definitively established that the principle of conservation of energy (CoE) can be violated, that is, one of the coldest, hardest principles of physics is no more a general principle. Furthermore, when a principle in physics loses it's generality, as was discovered regarding the principle of CoE, it cannot be considered a principle any more. What we're doing now is trying to find engineering (practical) applications of that violation of CoE which is a very hard task.

[paulie1982]

No, it doesn't. It has already been definitively established that the principle of conservation of energy (CoE) can be violated

How so? I've never seen any definitive proof of any machine/device breaking the CoE, all i have ever seen is badly filmed machines with ample hiding space for a small electric motor or machines designed by people and they try to blind you with science so you eventually concede to - oh, it must work then if there's that much thought gone into it.
I'm more than happy to be proven wrong though.

[Honk]

Hi
Check your email.

[paulie1982]

Hi Honk, checked my mail, thanks for the info, i'm having a look at it now.