Tri-Force Magnets - Finally shown to be OU?

[Omnibus]

...
You see what obvious nonsense one @zerotenzor resorts to in his complete inability to find arguments against a clear cut example. Why provide him with seeming ammunition, allowing him to discuss "tri-gate" in terms of violating CoE Don't get me wrong, "tri-gate" also violates CoE but, like I said, it isn't the shining example, which the magnetic propulsor is, that would make a clever critic speechless (leaving the argument only to a stupid person). ...

@Rusty_Springs:
You see what name-calling @Omnibus resorts to when challenged, all the while injecting his own pet device into the thread and claiming its ultimate superiority.  I think your triforce experiments are great.  And I think it would be interesting to see the interaction of the steel ball with the magnetic fields in any of these kinds of setups.

@Omnibus:
<sarc>
Oh heavens!  we wouldn't want to allow @zerotensor to discuss triforce on the triforce thread in the discussion forum!  That would be horrible!
</sarc>

I am here to help figure this stuff out.  We are all in it together.

I suggest that you knock off the "stupidity" attacks.  It makes you look...    stupid.

This stuff is already figured out as far as violation of CoE is conecerned. Your muddled thinking isn't needed to confuse even further people such as @Rusty_Springs who are not comfortable with scientific argumentation to begin with. Don't try to find shelter with the weak such as @Rusty_Spring and seek support from them. When violation of CoE is concerned you'll meet me and your finagling and nonsense will not pass. This is a warning.

[wings]

"Permanent Magnet Motors --- Build One"

http://www.rexresearch.com/monus/monus.htm#1

Marzio

[gwhy!]

Dear Mrs Omnibus,
Why are you still banging on about the f**king SMOT thing. What does SMOT stand for anyway...

Some
More
Omnibus
Tat

Graham's tri-gate can do the same thing that is in the video you posted but a lot more efficiently, you only got to look at all the videos that Graham and Clanzer has shown for visual proof.

[Omnibus]

Dear Mrs Omnibus,
Why are you still banging on about the f**king SMOT thing. What does SMOT stand for anyway...

Some
More
Omnibus
Tat

Graham's tri-gate can do the same thing that is in the video you posted but a lot more efficiently, you only got to look at all the videos that Graham and Clanzer has shown for visual proof.

Of course. The so-called "tri-gate" is a sort of SMOT and a magnetic propulsor and it also demonstrates violation of CoE. That goes without saying. Like I said, the magnetic propulsor which I'm showing allows to easier pin down any critic because it is more clear cut theoretically. That's important in a scientific discussion, especially when the critics (the competent ones) are obviously dishonest as the experience shows.

[HopeForHumanity]

Omnibus is the sort of person who would jump in a wrecked car to tell the person inside it will explode soon, and not get out. Omnibus is commiting proffesional suicide. Would a scientist study earthquakes in a biology lab?