No Lenz Generator Idea

[Marcel]

Hi all,
Does someone can perform a simulation for my new idea?
The small motor drives a 10 magnets rotor.
Magnets are sequentially N-S-N-S etc..
Each coil includes a cylindric Metglass core.
The external C core is ferrite material.
A Vizimag simulation show the back EMF prefers the left side of the core.
and have no influence on the rotor.
Any suggestions?
Watch a 3D animation:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ySId1F9YKvM

Marcel
Paris, France.

[Marcel]

....

[Marcel]

...

[nightlife]

Marcel, I like this design and but I would like to see a couple things changed to help utilize it's full potential.

I will study this concept for a bit and give you some suggestions that you may find helpful. I will say that your design's concept may involve a concept that I have not found in any other design and I have been holding back from telling anyone because if everyone knew, they would be running out and get it patented. Patents tend to be bought and put on a shelf and not used. I for one feel that is wrong and why things are as they are today as far as our dependence on focal fuels.

I am not sure if you realize what I am talking about and I am not sure if you intend to use this design how I am thinking it could be used. I need to know more about your idea on how you want it to work as well as the materials you plan to use for the different parts of this design. Like, what would you use for the rotor?
You mentioned the back EMF referring to the back side of the coil and that makes me wonder if you really know what EMF is. The other issue is that you plan to place magnets north then south and so on, That makes me believe that you intend to change the coils current direction back and forth from a north pole to south pole. Is that right?

The more I think about it, the more I know that even you have not figured out the concept that I have been looking for in these pulse motors. I started a thread for people to post the most efficient motor designs they know of and I have found that not one of them have utilized the concept that I have in mind. Your design has been the closest but based on what you have said, you have not utilized it and it would only take a couple small changes for you to do so.

One thing that you must do is find out what you actually are trying to produce and what it's raw form is. I think most have over looked what I am looking for in these designs because they have all jumped past the basic's because they believe that what they have been already taught is true.

How can you efficiently produce energy if you don?t even know what it is? Most of our energy conversions motors are between 20% and 35% efficient. We are wasting the rest and that is mainly because most do not know what energy really even is. The most efficient ones are listed in a thread called, "What is the most efficient motor designed". It is in the news category. Only a few have been posted thus far and I am hoping on others posting more. I want only the ones that have been proven to be as efficient as they are said to be.

I must applaud you on your design and I hope you can figure out the changes you need to make to utilize your designs fullest potential. Good luck and thank you for posting it for us all to see. I may want to use your design in my conclusion of the said thread but before I do, I must be able to contact you in private.




 

[Marcel]

Hi Nightlife,
Thanks for your tips. At this time I'm working on a medium scale toroid generator based on the Sullivan patent and not started this one.
If you need to contact me, don't hesitate.
My email is marcel.thibault@gmaildotcom
I will send you a short 3DsMAx animation.

Marcel.