Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



im curious why ?.

Started by b0rg13, March 18, 2008, 07:38:16 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Scorpile

Why are people discussing what other people think?

I belive this forum exist so everyone can expose their thinking and receive feedback from others.

You can do brainstorming here, if you like what someone thinks, you like it, if you don't... well...

I never seen Stefan reject somebody's opinion just because he don't like it.

I could tell you that mayor people here are failing to achieve overunity because they are seeking the meaning of the word overunity, trying to rip "well known" phisics laws, instead of trying to build machines that extract more energy than needed for operating the machine, like i said before, how many energy is contained on TNT, how many energy you need to make TNT explode, how many energy TNT relases when explodes.  For me, that's overunity... you are not creating energy, you just found a way to get more for less, no matter how or where was that exceding energy contained.  But somebody will say that's not overunity.

Now... somebody will try to make shame on me because for what i think?  If you don't like it, what can i do?

For me, is interesting to see (as Yoda says), people  complaining for opinions of people who don't make the experiment but give an opinion.  We know we are not Einstein, but he just came with theories without any prior test, and see what happened for example with atomic bomb.  They (cientific crew) was seeking a way to "implode" the atom, because Einstein had the theory that way the atom could fragment...  And you seen Nagasaki and Hirochima.

If i have an opinion, and belive me Stefan will allow everyone to post their opinions... i will post it... if you can prove i'm wrong, do it, and belive me that if you prove i'm wrong, i will be happy and will thank you, but if you cannot prove i'm worng... please, respect my or anybody else opinion.

We are all seeking the same.

innovation_station

@ z.monkey

i like your pic there

looks like it works well

almost like my MOTOR AIDER  INDUCTIVE KICKBACK ..... for 3 phase ac motors hummmmm....

ist

To understand the action of the local condenser E in fig.2 let a single discharge be first considered. the discharge has 2 paths offered~~ one to the condenser E the other through the part L of the working circuit C. The part L  however  by virtue of its self induction  offers a strong opposition to such a sudden discharge  wile the condenser on the other hand offers no such opposition ......TESLA..

THE !STORE IS UP AND RUNNING ...  WE ARE TAKEING ORDERS ..  NOW ..   ISTEAM.CA   AND WE CAN AND WILL BUILD CUSTOM COILS ...  OF   LARGER  OUTPUT ...

CAN YOU SAY GOOD BYE TO YESTERDAY?!?!?!?!

z.monkey

Hey Nightlife,
I can understand your frustration of what you are talking about in this thread.  It seems that I started a fight in the Overunity Question thread.  It's not just that we have a fundamentals problem, but even when two people have similar concepts in their minds, they don't pick the same words to express their ideas.  It seems a miscommunication of an idea is fodder for a virtual battle of intellects.  Then there are the people who are just out in space.  They try to convey and idea, or whatever is in their head, and it just comes out as nonsensical gibberish.  Like they take one electronics class then watch 100 science fiction movies, and then go try to invent something.

I would like to interject an idea at this point.  It would be wrong to disallow anyone access to a public forum.  After all this is a smelting pot of ideas and everyone should have access to and be able to interject ideas.  But I am thinking that there should be a certified layer, above general public access.  Something that established members can access when they have more that X amount of posts (full member status) and have to pass some sort of competency exams to prove that they are seriously interested in pursuing the quest for free energy for the benefit of mankind.  This would keep access to the certified layer away from the anti-productive factions which are making this site undesirable.

So what do you think?

Blessed Be...
Goodwill to All, for All is One!

nightlife

z.monkey, I honestly would hate to see anyone left out and just hope all can discuss things respectfully. There are some of us that don't have much education in this field but I think what we are all looking for is beyond anyones education level.

I think things are fine as they are although I must say, some do push things a bit to far as for the way they talk to others.

one

Quote from: z.monkey on March 20, 2008, 02:32:01 PM
Hey Nightlife,
I can understand your frustration of what you are talking about in this thread.  It seems that I started a fight in the Overunity Question thread.  It's not just that we have a fundamentals problem, but even when two people have similar concepts in their minds, they don't pick the same words to express their ideas.  It seems a miscommunication of an idea is fodder for a virtual battle of intellects.  Then there are the people who are just out in space.  They try to convey and idea, or whatever is in their head, and it just comes out as nonsensical gibberish.  Like they take one electronics class then watch 100 science fiction movies, and then go try to invent something.

I would like to interject an idea at this point.  It would be wrong to disallow anyone access to a public forum.  After all this is a smelting pot of ideas and everyone should have access to and be able to interject ideas.  But I am thinking that there should be a certified layer, above general public access.  Something that established members can access when they have more that X amount of posts (full member status) and have to pass some sort of competency exams to prove that they are seriously interested in pursuing the quest for free energy for the benefit of mankind.  This would keep access to the certified layer away from the anti-productive factions which are making this site undesirable.

So what do you think?

Blessed Be...

I  think that when  someone  is trying to build  something  they should  be able to  start  a  new thread and be the modorator of that thread .
No  one  should  have to put up with  pages of  posts from skeptics  that  have never tried to build  anything in their  intire lives.
I  have been making  plans  and  buying  parts for quite a while now   getting ready for my  project.

I have been here long  enough to know  better than to  post  anything   without  proof .
( in this  forum it is a  major sin  to claim  overunity   if   you can't quickly prove it. ..........although   skeptics  can make any  claim  that  they  want about  something being imposable  and  no proof is  ever  expected .)

I will not have any proof  until  my project is  finished and  running.

I don't have the background  to   explain  my  ideas according to   standard   scientific   rules . 

I  have no   desire to spend  much of my time   explaining why  normal  scientific  laws  may not apply.



I would think that the  best thing a builder   could   do to   save time for everyone interested in  his  or her  idea is to ban the  skeptics  from the  thread .

I am not  suggesting that   skeptics  be  banned  from   the whole site ....... just  threads  for actually  building  things.   


gary