Complete information on working SM style device.

[EMdevices]

the only thing that intreagues me about spherics is that he brought some information about SM, even though it doesn't fit and his theory is flawed in my opinion.

This makes me wonder, is he an old timer that did what we are doing now,  back in the 90's?   and now he came back due to the intensity of this effort and Jack coming forward?  I think he and Jack know each other and previously interacted on a forum.

I think this might be the explanation,  these are old timers  (and even Jack claimed he disclosed some info at Kelly website before)  and it's interesting to see what kind of misinformation about SM, was flowing around back then.   Where did they get it?

EM

[Rosphere]

@ Rosphere
You may be right, but the man says 30 degrees, and made it boldfaced.  You might try it his way first.

@Bruce_TPU,

There is only one reference to the 30 degrees upwards angle.  (It may be emboldened because he wanted to emphasize the upward angle as it follows the text which states that the three coils are not on a horizontal plane.)

However, a reexamination of spherics first post shows eight text references and four links to the hexagonal packing tetrahedron which requires a 19.5 degree upwards angle.

There is an obvious discrepancy here: if the correct upwards angle is indeed 30 degrees then all of the other references to the HSP tetrahedron are incorrect. I believe that it is much more likely that the man made one mistake instead of twelve mistakes.  Or, he may be using an irregular tetrahedron.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Close-packing

http://cst-www.nrl.navy.mil/lattice/index.html

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RXO7-Lajxdg

http://www.everyscience.com/Chemistry/Inorganic/Ionic_Solids/a.1296.php

...To resonate with the ether a specific pattern is required. The spherical propagation of waves means that spherical packing dictates the precise location of electromagnet coils for optimum control. Review the files at the start of this posting. Hexagonal spherical packing (HSP) is where you need to focus. Many of you are unwittingly using face centered cubic ( FCC ) arrangement of coils. You will have limited success if your coils are placed according to FCC arrangements.

There is good reason for hexagonal packing as these scientists are beginning to comprehend.
Google the following terms to understand:  iron superconductivity hexagonal packing

All coils need to point to a central 3D location. If you look at the hexagonal packing the most basic arrangement is 4 spheres forming a tetrahedral. Place identical coils orientated so that the poles point to the dead center of the tetrahedral. You should imagine 3 spheres with one sphere on top. The top coil (coil A) will be pointing downwards and the other 3 coils (X,Y,Z) will be pointing to wards the center BUT note the three coils will not be in a horizontal plane; they will be pointing 30 degrees upwards...  If you set up according to hexagonal packing all coils are equidistant from each other and pointing towards a common center...

So, I first plan to use the pure tetrahedron with its 19.5 degree upwards angle.  I am also considering the design of a support structure with a potential future rework in mind so that I can simply insert three 10.5 degree wedges to get to the 30 degree upward angle, (and the vertically stretched irregular tetrahedron.)

[konduct]

Music is a good approach but it will give you an upper limit of 20khz

I can at least go as high as 6 Mhz ...effectively higher by doubling the octaves. 20Khz is just the end of the audible range...it doesn't just "stop" there.

[Feynman]

@Rosphere

I think your exploration of 3D geometry modeling is excellent.  I will mention what I know regarding hexagonal close packing and tetrahedrons...


DNA is a charged molecule.  It is electronegative and repels itself.  (yes I am going somewhere with this!)   In bacteriophage T4, the well known virus that looks like a little spider, DNA follows hexagonal close packing, because it minimizes the potential energy of the DNA inside an icosohedron. The DNA is "pressurized" inside the virus capsid and configures itself into spiral crystal geometries.






The shape of the viral capsid is ICOSOHEDRAL.  I don't know if this helps you, but it seems to me it's related to a tetrahedron.

Icosahedron with triangles colored to show construction as a snub tetrahedron

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Icosohedron


Anyway, I hope this helps and is not too off-topic; I definitely support the 3D geometry modelling.   Nature has built in geometries.

[Feynman]

konduct:  I've got a juno 106 synth but it don't go higher than about 22khz...how are you planning on doing the frequency doubling?   

Thanks