Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Steven Mark´s associate Jack Durban comes forward with more info !

Started by zapnic, March 17, 2008, 04:28:58 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 11 Guests are viewing this topic.

aleks

Quote from: zerotensor on March 22, 2008, 02:18:01 PM
IMO, the electromagnetic field is a special case of gravity.  The combination of toroidal and poloidal angular momenta in charged particles imparts a global helicity to spacetime, which is interpreted as EM.   From this perspective, gravity is the only "force".  The trick is to convert between the longitudinal and torsional components of the gravity field.  A "vortex implosion" sure seems like a good candidate for achieving this.  Perhaps the energy flow in the TPU emulates that of a charged particle, with the toroidal and poloidal fluxes "locked into"  some harmonious combination.
Well, I'm not that much fluent with your language, so can't comment on it, sorry. Is there any evidence that gravity field has some 'longitudinal and torsional' components? Of course, if we do not call up mythical gravitons that cannot be even detected in reality. Experiment with sonoluminescence does not require 'vortex' of any kind, but it does deal with atomic structure and particles it seems. Unfortunately, conventional science seem to avoid to discuss energy efficiency aspect of sonoluminescence. According to Hans von Lieven's http://keelytech.com/sonoluminescence.html the released energy is ultra-high. According to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sonoluminescense the power of each light burst is 1-10mW (should be microwatts), but it does not mention frequency. Hans von Lieven's page mentions 100mHz ("vibrating with extreme regularity every 100 millionths of a second"). Multiply  100mHz by 5 mW and you'll have 500W of laser-like blue-ultraviolet energy. If you'll try to emit as much acoustic energy you'll destroy the equipment (which is just a glass filled with water). Typical ultrasonic buzzers are rated 0.2W for 100 dB SPL @ 10" - you can get an incredible input/output ratio (1000 fold - more than most TPUs can offer :). This should be probably treated as another free energy source. Can anybody suggest a "catcher" for the light beam to convert it into electric current?

wattsup

Mr. Durban said one word "Dominant" that was caught by Erfinder and very well explained.

Mr. Durban said two other words "reed switch". lol

Try this at home. It works.

Regarding Hendershot, think of his device as an AC producing system, whereas 1 TPU device produces DC and 2 TPU devices would then produce AC if they were phased at 180 degrees. lol

Look carefully at the Hendershot device because it is all there.

I would say four vertical coils at 90 degress each but each coil is actual two coils, two wires are wound together, that's 8 coils. Each coil is paired with its 180 degree opposite making 4 pairs. Now concentrate on the flyback which is 100 times more voltage then the initial voltage pulsed to the coils. The bifilar type (but not bilifar in connection) will reduce BEMF. Yey I know I hate that word. I will make a diagram soon.

bolt

Im gonna start a new thread called. The real and final way to make a TPU. Why not? everyone else has one LOL

sparks i seen that before its interesting im not sure how well it works as a TPU design.

To my mind there is 5 common stages to producing a TPU device

1) create the initial conditions to create a static dominant charge that exists everywhere to create a PD. This is our dipole now we have a positive and negative charge on each end but its too weak to do anything.

2)Increase the PD still higher using a charge pump. This creates a higher PD by depletion on the negative charge on our dipole which will force the positive to become more positive.. It now has PD but no current its basically high voltage static electricity.

3) now push this static dominant charge along the copper wire using a very weak rotating magnetic force on both the positive AND negative side of the dipole at first a tiny 9 volt battery circuit  is plenty.

4)Note we are not dealing with conventional current flow at this time thus there is no drag and no back emf or other nasties. However the faster the spin the higher order the static dominant goes to yielding a REAL increase in power on each side of the dipole. The dipole wants to collapse but the energy generated is much higher then the order in which to keep the spin going. Its DC too because we are forcing the depletion on one side. At this point some of the energy is fed back to the coil to provide the rotation in the form of electro magnetic energy to keep the dominant spinning so the process starts off slow and winds up. We can do this because unlike a normal electron flow dominant does not try to resist our efforts to drive it with magnetic field.

5) there is now real power between the dipole ends. As a load is presented to the dipole its only purpose in life is to collapse to kill the dipole however the amount of energy it will provide in trying to close the dipole is massive yet the energy required to create this condition is tiny. Remember like lightning there is only the catalyst for power till the very moment the PD tries to return to zero. It take very little power to produce the precursor. We have PD and the current is created by the spin therefore we have power. The introduction of electromagnetic spin creates heat this is conventional nothing we can do about this but the energy available is infinitively greater then the energy required to maintain the spin.

bolt

Food for thought

A lightning charge contains 30 million volts at 100,000 amperes.

The total energy in a large thunderstorm is more than that in an atomic bomb.

what lets think about this for a second. Where does lightning get all this power from? More then an atomic bomb and 30 million volts at 100,000 amperes and this comes out of a cloud? No it cant do unless Tesla is rights and this energy comes from the ether thats the only possible explanation and there is no magnets and coils up there either:)

sparks

Quote from: mikestocks2006 on March 22, 2008, 01:54:47 PM
The question is,
Is there a BEMF opposing the movement of the magnet, when the magnet is moved ALONG (parallel) to the straight piece of wire, and the ands of the wire are connected to a load?

If there is no BEMF, then this is OU.

So then, in the torroid, the secondary is the core  and the collector at the same time?
Is the rest simply timing to get the field to move, instead of a straight line, in a circle, in this case rotate over (along and around) the collector.?

I believe all Bemf is caused by the ambient magnetic field regaining control of space more or less. So this is a form of "energy"that needs to be collected.
Think Legacy
A spark gap is cold cold cold
Space is a hot hot liquid
Spread the Love