Meyer-Mace Isotopic NMR Generator

[T-1000]

Moved from Dally thread:

Hi T-1000. Thanks for the info. For now, my focus is on trying to replicate as reasonably close as I can your Lithuania experiment setup in which you guys
made use of the ferrite yoke core.  I have a yoke core of what appears to be about the same size, although I can't say if the material composition
is close or the same as the yoke core you guys used. I have previously posted the markings on my yoke core.

Yes, I saw Wesley's warning that some participants suffered some ill effects and that this setup might possibly generate radiation.
If I start to see any unusual effects such as over unity with this setup, I may possibly invest in a small portable geiger counter to measure
radiation levels. However, for now my focus will be on just trying to replicate the setup you guys used.

I have a few questions on the yoke core experiment setup, if you have a few minutes at some point.

1)
Were you able to see the over unity effect with no high voltage spark gap discharges applied to the horizontal
winding wrap of copper strap around one half of the yoke core? My understanding is that you were able to see
the over unity effect without these HV discharges applied, but at lower power levels. Just want to confirm this point.

We simulated spark gap signal without high voltage. The copper strip had freewheeling LC circuit on the core

2)
Should I place the horizontal copper strap wrap underneath the two vertically wound primary windings, or underneath
the output vertically wound bifilar winding?

Please see http://overunity.com/4333/meyer-mace-isotopic-nmr-generator/msg339192/#msg339192

3)
Were you able to see the over unity effect with no earth ground connection to any of the windings or light bulb load?
Were you able to see the overunity effect with no scope probe leads connected to any of the windings?
Just want to understand if an earth ground connection might have been a factor when you were seeing over unity.

We always used ground connection as I remember. That was 5 years ago already.
The scope probes was not required after tuning.

4)
I think I know the answer to this, but I just want to make sure I am clear about this.
Is the output bifilar winding connected with the two bifilar winding sections connected such that their
inductance is additive (non-cancelling) or were the two halves connected with the winding inductances cancelling?

The schematic says 150 turns. Does this mean the total turns of both bifilar windings included together?

It was simple bifilar coil , no cw-ccw windings.

5)
The schematic posted by Wesley shows capacitors were connected in parallel to the output bifilar windings.
What total capacitance value was used when you were seeing overunity, and what was the intended purpose for these capacitors?
Was the total capacitance value chosen for resonance with the output windings at some particular frequency? If so, what frequency were
you aiming for as the resonance frequency?

The capacitor in parallel helped to tune maximum output. The memory is blurry about capacitance values.

And as I mentioned in http://overunity.com/12736/kapanadze-cousin-dally-free-energy/msg473042/#msg473042
the common materials in yoke core and other NMR places was Cobalt and Barium.
For the assembly the effect was partialy replicated by ZeroFossilFuel - http://alt-nrg.org/Kapanadze.html

[Void]

Moved from Dally thread:
We simulated spark gap signal without high voltage. The copper strip had freewheeling LC circuit on the corePlease see http://overunity.com/4333/meyer-mace-isotopic-nmr-generator/msg339192/#msg339192We always used ground connection as I remember. That was 5 years ago already.
The scope probes was not required after tuning.It was simple bifilar coil , no cw-ccw windings.The capacitor in parallel helped to tune maximum output. The memory is blurry about capacitance values.

And as I mentioned in http://overunity.com/12736/kapanadze-cousin-dally-free-energy/msg473042/#msg473042
the common materials in yoke core and other NMR places was Cobalt and Barium.
For the assembly the effect was partialy replicated by ZeroFossilFuel - http://alt-nrg.org/Kapanadze.html

Thanks for the feedback T-1000!
I didn't see where ZeroFossilFuel posted about any results he had in his tests.
Do you recall what sort of results he saw?

[verpies]

Seems like this is yet another project that fell asleep.

It has not.  It just has moved to a different forum.

Furthermore, it was mentioned that the frequency of 21MHz must be matched precisely. I think that is wrong. In NMR nuclear magnetic resonance,  the resonance can be achieved by any frequency, if the magnetic field has the right strength. For instance with the earths magnetic field, resonance can be achieved with a few kilohertz.

Indeed, the NMR frequency of hydrogen, water and other paramagnetics increases linearly with magnetic flux density.
...but that is not true with bulk solid iron.

Iron's nuclear resonance frequency stays constant at 45.5MHz up to 0.6T and decreases at higher magnetic flux densities.
See the graph below.

[T-1000]

Thanks for the feedback T-1000!
I didn't see where ZeroFossilFuel posted about any results he had in his tests.
Do you recall what sort of results he saw?

http://overunity.com/7679/selfrunning-free-energy-devices-up-to-5-kw-from-tariel-kapanadze/msg317589/#msg317589

[Void]

http://overunity.com/7679/selfrunning-free-energy-devices-up-to-5-kw-from-tariel-kapanadze/msg317589/#msg317589

Hi T-1000. Ok, I see. You can actually get that sort of effect where spark gap discharges are freezing up
or otherwise messing up computers and various other types of electronics equipment all around the house, 
which I believe is due to HV transients covering a wide frequency spectrum feeding back into the mains and traveling
around the mains wiring to various equipment in the house. Some equipment that is nearby and not mains connected
can also still be affected that way as well due to the strong radiated EM noise in the vicinity of the spark gap. I have
had this happening a few times several years ago when I was doing a lot of experiments with different spark gap circuits.
I don't think there is necessarily anything unusual with such an effect when sparkgaps are involved.