OU/COP>1 switched cap PS cct like Tesla's 'charge siphoning'

[nul-points]

Min, i think your meds are wearing off! 

all the best
sandy
Doc Ringwood's Free Energy site  http://ringcomps.co.uk/doc

[NerzhDishual]

MinEth3r,

I'm not sure to understand you fully...    

Best

[MinEth3r]

As for the magnet previously mentionne in the thread,,
Semi-circular - spiral - eddy currents inside a capacitor, is leak current enough to get that 1.2+losses OU result?
A magnet over concentric cylinders capacitor, a magnet being a loop of n amperes, might get some inductive
kickback through currents flowing through the cap at discharge or charging time. Transient analysis anyone? Got myself free pdf-ed books on the very matter :O)

   My fun now, as I'm not losing it, as it may appear to the non-initiated mouhahaha :PPP; is to think that a really good full 3D theory of the electron is possible. Maybe its even 4D with a parametrized 4thD being proper time over universal time, itself coming from the null 5D postulate, maybe pertubing this null condition would yield something like functional equations to model finite speed of forces?! In the 1 over RRR, in the near-field/bound fields it might be faster than the speed of light, in fact it ought to be etheric pressure having its toll I guess. I know, I know, a full 3D theory of the Electron has been attempted before, really complicated topic, lots of work already done by minds far greater than mine, but I got lots of modern information source that those guys didn't have, G. Lafreni?re, A. Gsponer, R. Distinti, Reiter, Brannen that all point to a new understanding of micro-phenomena, of etheric phenomena.

Maybe leftover spin gets racheted/rectified somehwere? I ought to model spin of an electron, when the spin changes speed, etc... ought to get it right from the start. Some would call my effort a mere reformulation. Lots of it is simply unifying notation, but what we might discover in the process is truly worth it;
E.g. the Geometric Fano plane is really amazing IMHO! Always wanted to see it.

Someone expounded my lack of consideration of the Hestenes and al. Conformal model of 3d Geometry. What it all boils down to is Geometric Algebra with the square of vectors being one of the four symmetric bilinear forms, one of them being the equality, the norm of the vector squared being 0, which leads one straight to the 5D Conformal model, the ultimate 3D algebra I know.

Five points to analyze translation+rotation means that 4 vectors/point differences are necessary :O) The nul 5d space popping up, this time with a correct introduction to powerful algebraic apparatus. Other parametrization possible, pythagorean hodograph curves, square root spiral, the Hurwitz quaternions, lots of
things to plug together. Geometric Norms as outlined by Douglas Lundholm, lots of stuff....

*  *  *

   So don't worry Nerzh, I don't understand it fully yet, either!, only know its really close to a wonderful breakthrough, perhaps fame awaits, who knows :PPP
From the lost post, I said in there that the base 61 modular math might answer what a friend of mine asked: what is the value of x? The context is missing, but the answer is right what I would love to answer back right away :O)

Thus one has to: get the proper math framework, rational polynomials should be enough, since its algebraic. Geometry and everythig has to be accounted for,
next one defines the experiment/simulation in the aforemnetionned mathematical framework, then one simplify the algebraic model and articulate it, calculate it. Still at step 0, although working on all the steps at once, wondering every now and then if my particular approach to physics research will yield what's hoped for....

Still hammering at it,
MinEth3r

[MinEth3r]

Quick close-up...

I will migrate my ramblings on on-going research on a dedicated thread, as suggested, this is not getting somewhere fast enough. Fame will have to wait ;O)
Base 61 is interesting, one the largest one one can explore with our unpunctuated latin glyph set, but other stuff to master first. *duh* :O)

Basically, 4D Geometry is essential, for a lot of reasons.
To get one of the best available glimpse, no less, on 4D geometry and stereographic projection,
    http://dimensions-math.org
is excellent. Hopf fibration, lots covered in there, marvelous. Really wanted to close it up on the thread with this.

Some supplementary material, a lot more available, lets be brief:
808.2730 on conformal transformation through history i.e more on the stereographic projection.
Latest paper from Almeida, 0807.3668, on 5D Nul Space Physics in different algebras show how to move amongst them.
0808_3169v1 uses 2x2 invertible quaternionic matrices to talk about (1+4) nul 5d space, great stuff but still murky; still struggling here to get the significance of Geodetic Angles by Conway et al... grrr! Potential applications in Rational Trigonometry & Chromogeometry comes instantly to mind.

  Also last week found out about Finite Harmonic Oscillators on Finite Fields through the work of Gurevich et al. and Algebraic Signal Processing Theory as exposed by P?schel and Moura. Definitely interesting, lots of interplay between them, still murky for me at best, but still, one can smell the goodness.

So lots of work, sorry for the bothersome format of my intermission, over and out on this thread! (*finally*:PP),
    MinEth3r

[nul-points]

hi Min

thanks for the update - looking forward to following your investigations in your new thread - hoping to throw a few new papers your way from time to time for evaluation

all the best
sandy
Doc Ringwood's Free Energy site  http://ringcomps.co.uk/doc