OU/COP>1 switched cap PS cct like Tesla's 'charge siphoning'

[MinEth3r]

 

Half read through the Alban manual, as a complementary read look at
    http://www.math.temple.edu/~wds/homepage/works.html and check paper 73, 72 and 67 among others :O)

    Pythagorean triples are one of my research area, superb articles on them on Arxiv, in the Advances in Applied Clifford Algebra academic journal too, it points to an indexable parametrization of quadratic space, of the circle/plane. But *that* would be the kind of thing that would lead us astray for now, much needed when tackling the CAD/Simulation part of things, IMHO once again.

    I'll try to tidy things up (can't always rely on others to do this for me, eh ;p) and put in online in English format in a concise page/pdf maybe. The Ivor Catt way of thinking about a capacitor might be of interest, if not already mentionned. Can't find the link to the step-charging picture of his mecanism of ping-pong energy shuffle between plates of a capacitor, anyway, might just be so wrong .

Good luck with the experimenting, I'm over and out for a short while, t'il I get something really useful for you guys groked out. Cheers!

[alan]

Information overload  many thanks

[MinEth3r]

Couldn't resist...

With stuff like this:
   http://ltamer.sf.net , found at lamdba-the-ultimate.org
... my job as an amateur Physicist/Mathematician/ActivityPlanner  - hahaha, how could someone read through me so heavenly  - would be a lot easier! I'm pretty excited right now 

   Let's take an example first hand: in the trade previously mentionned one must put all his or her acquired mathematical/mechanical machinery towards groking work from the likes of Florentin Smarandache at Al., that seem to only take slighlty tortuous roads and don't name 'em in the right lexical field One has to be sure it's genuine math, so to speak? It probably is, most certainly though: it's was our own previous mathematical judgement as fellow competent technicians on Earth that has taken a decisive blow in its legs. So many years astray...
    http://arxiv.org/abs/0806.2847
Also recently their Super-Mathematics of Exctentered stuff is quite appealing, I only get like 15 % of what they're saying. Recently it has been proven that a plane perpendicular and slighlty perpendicular to the revolving axe cutting a torus (the Cross product part of the sphere in 3D, as a shabby example, think dividing by fractions, near the center/zero )is always a quartic. A Lot of math in Rational Trigonometry is Quartic.

Can't you see the bias, that everything around you is terribly wrong? Take this one here, most fascinating work, along with other great NT paper down that ArXiv pitt...

Number Theory: Square Root Spiral
==========================

    http://arxiv.org/find/math/1/au:+Hahn_H/0/1/0/all/0/1

When one *knows beforehand* about NJWildberger's ?NonUni/Bi/?Linear? Math, in fact being truly *basic math anyone could have uncovered, always there for the taking, the understanding by each and every school children, that's the size of the shared shame I'm talking about sometimes*, one knows it's simply the most simple spiral possible, and it does take full sense when one does work quadratically. Wonderful exercice, PI squared pops in. Prime numbers are wondefully investigated. Each one is a color, one could say, a scalar color.

    Now, after a while...
     after even just glancing at the pictures and material, pythagorean triples will take their meaning head-on. Color in Physics most of the time means three elements in a ring, not bits but trits, fields of three elements; as Wildberger noted, base/modulo 2 is degenerate, 1=-1 modulo 2 ! It is sub-classification, degenerate in some pointy aspects, since a lot's still working and even with shortcuts, very efficiently,  still pointy to me after all this time, yet the fun continues... thinking about Nico Benschop's crucial work on the matter, his multiplier patent... lots of great people out there, let me tell you  Here's the  Abstract of one of his Arxiv paper, to give you a taste... of the tiem we're wasting every second we don't know this kind of stuff! :PPP:

A new Binary Number Code and a Multiplier, based on 3 as semi-primitive root of 1 mod 2^k
Authors: N.F. Benschop
(Submitted on 3 May 2001)

    Abstract: The powers of 3 generate half of the odd residues mod 2^k (k>2), and a sign change yields the other half. In other words: 3 is a semi-primitive root of 1 mod 2^k (k>2). Hence each k-bit residue is n = +/- 3^i.2^j mod 2^k, with unique non-neg exponent pair: i<2^{k-2} and j<k. -- A new "dual base logarithmic" binary number code (bases 2 and 3) employs this property. This (binary) log-code [s,i,j] - where s is the corresponding sign, simplifies binary multiplication by translating it to addition of the exponents of 2 and 3, and XOR of the signs involved. -- Patent US-5923888 (13jul99)

[MinEth3r]

Hi everyone,

    I'm way too taken over by the mathematical opportunities out there, let me summarize where a quick glance at the recent columns ArXiV took me, truly on the topic we started to explore, really!, maybe a thread change, but we can steer it back whenever we have the correct theory of inertia/energy ;O) it's dead anyway, isn't, genuinely wondering here:

  Regarding Maxwell equations, and evaluating Distinti's and other's work, along with what follows, one of the single best modern treatments around:
Ulrich Gerlach's Linear Mathematics in IUnfinite Dimensions
Partial Differential Equations,
System of Partial Differential Equations: How to Solve Maxwell's Equations Using Linear Algebra
http://www.math.ohio-state.edu/~gerlach/math/BVtypset/BVtypset.html

    One can then criticize current em/physical theories on solid ground, with a couple such good standpoints in the backpack as Cliffordian biquaternions (read: 8x8 matrices) as used by Lanczos and later Gsponer, or 8x8 matrices as by Sammeed Ahmed Khan and al. (using Foldy-Whothuysen iterative diagonalization technique, such as pushed as "Quantum Harmonic Oscillator: the Third Way" by Marsiglio from UEdmonton!). Pretty interesting already, this old stuff... (yeah old, as in: should be already known everywhere!)

BUT!,
   nowadays one has under the belt papers such as those, on the mathematical side:
    0803_3782v2 - SCHWARTZ, Charles - Analytic Functions of a Quaternionic Variable
    0804_2869v1 - SCHWARTZ, Charles - Analytic Functions of a General Matrix Variable
    0806_3411v1 - HANS, Jochen - N-th Root
    0805_0311v1 - GALLIER, Jean - Clifford Algebras, Clifford Groups and a Generalization of the Quaternions,, The Pin and Spin Groups
        (already in the delightful Clifford Algebra Master Thesis previously mentionned!)
    0407032v1 - SUZUKI, Alfredo Takashi - Evaluating residues and integrals through Negative Dimensional Integration Method (NDIM)
and on the Physics side
    0805_3859v1 - SOBCZYK, YARMAN - Principle of Local Conservation of Energy-Momentum
        (marvelous paper, right on topic!!! )
    euclideanrelativity.com's papers
    www.electromagnetism.demon.co.uk/xh9theor.htm
       (The constant speed EM/everything Ivor Catt theory!)

* * *

   I think we (highly fuzzy we) can build together a good enough EM theory relating current and light, induced/Eddy-/Foucault's currents while encompassing shape contraction and a mechanical explanation of kinetic energy, a correct accounting of mass changes... if we manage to unite a lot of disparate papers and work, perhaps it would be so great we would have to feedback every one the referenced authors, to show where their work fits in a coherent picture, and spark something powerful.
Would start with something one can explain to kids any age and work from there! The No-Bullshit Linear Algebra course by G. Sobczyk

   The endeavour isn't entirely off-topic, it's in fact the utmost continuation of an effort to understand what's going on in there; some of our current scientific achievements are leaving the real world far behind, with us in it. We can do better, don't you think?! :O)

    Still handing some time here and there to the Mission ,
        MnEt3hr


    Still wondering about the Doc Ringwood montage's ferrite bias, about the small but powerful magnet and it's stationed position, too close to the coilmaybe.. just asking again, didn't get the answer yet, or any picture of the working circuit, layout wise sometimes one get screwed, although especially notifiable when working in low-power megacycleperseconds range with a o'scope power supply nearby, which isnt the case here! :O) If one is to measure energy propagation one has to know approximate dimensions and relative placement. Perhaps I could give a hand too, but I lack supplies, money and space in my cramped apartment, sorry :O)

[nul-points]

absolutely

'still rivers run deep'

...i think you may have missed the boat, Min, the practical stuff has moved on to the PM phase now