IPMM MAN-device for the proof of magnetic overunity.

AnandAadhar · April 09, 2008, 02:38:31 PM

Quote from: helmut on April 09, 2008, 10:14:18 AM
@AnandAadhar
Again and again i have to read and make up my mind.
It is because your setup is working in many dimensions.
I dont know what to say but Welcome and thanks for sharing with us.

helmut

I am even considering to also appraoch it from the vertical dimension, to close in the reactive force in all three axes of space. It is the space energy after all.

AA

Low-Q · April 09, 2008, 04:42:56 PM

@AnandAadhar:
Thanks for sharing your thoughts. I just wonder why you manually, by your right hand, moves the stator 2 up and down during the test.
The device is somewhat complex, but I cannot see the function of stator 1 except being a load to the stator 2, and vica versa. It seems stator 1 and 2 is perfectly working against each other. The difference is torque vs. distance they move - like a transmission with two gear ratios - same energy but different speed and torque, if you know what i mean.
The spinning disc, with the magnets on it, I cannot see the benifits of that particular shape, as magnetism allways finds a way to equalize the N and S poles. I mean that S and N in a magnet is allways equal. Hence, you cannot use one pole without being affected by the other pole.
Please explain further your thoughts.

Cheers

Vidar

infringer · April 09, 2008, 05:41:48 PM

There are methods of shielding the affect of one side of the magnet is there not possibly coper sheeting made into a half of a box blocking the effect of one side and all the way around the other side....

I aint the super guru or nothing but I would assume it is possible to block the effect on one pole without effecting the other.

Anyhow good effort with the IPMM MAN once again.

ponder this:

A disc elevated able to spin with bearing as it spins it brings up 4 neo's at 90 degree intervals right on time having the proper sides shielded .....

Look at the build of a sterling engine to better get the picture but at the proper time they will meet opposite poles and push and as it pushes the retract back down then up like a piston....

Why not even ponder using sterling engine to possibly make up for the sticky spots in magnetic motors by using the heat generated from spin and friction I am sure its possible!

AnandAadhar · April 10, 2008, 06:34:29 AM

Quote from: Low-Q on April 09, 2008, 04:42:56 PM
@AnandAadhar:
Thanks for sharing your thoughts. I just wonder why you manually, by your right hand, moves the stator 2 up and down during the test.
The device is somewhat complex, but I cannot see the function of stator 1 except being a load to the stator 2, and vica versa. It seems stator 1 and 2 is perfectly working against each other. The difference is torque vs. distance they move - like a transmission with two gear ratios - same energy but different speed and torque, if you know what i mean.
The spinning disc, with the magnets on it, I cannot see the benifits of that particular shape, as magnetism allways finds a way to equalize the N and S poles. I mean that S and N in a magnet is allways equal. Hence, you cannot use one pole without being affected by the other pole.
Please explain further your thoughts.

Cheers

Vidar

The stator of the first arm (in the middle under the orange tape) is positioned right in the center of the disc which spinning itself out of the influence of that neo will deliver a back and forward movement of the arm because of the disc its polarity (black/white + & orange -). I demonstrate that setup in my other videos at Youtube. The point was to make a loop: the first stator moves the disc which drives the arm back and forth as a kind of back-emf, that movement makes the lever flip and moves the second arm which drives the cakra then again from the outside and thus the process can repeat itself endlessly on the condition that there is enough reaction force from the magnet fields being stressed in the loop. The setup needs to pressure the magnets in such a way that they escaping from it will deliver a constant imbalance. The diallel galaxy-like organization of the disc is essential, it won't properly spin on as well an inside as an outside stator impuls without.

AnandAadhar · April 10, 2008, 06:44:16 AM

Quote from: infringer on April 09, 2008, 05:41:48 PM
There are methods of shielding the affect of one side of the magnet is there not possibly coper sheeting made into a half of a box blocking the effect of one side and all the way around the other side....

I aint the super guru or nothing but I would assume it is possible to block the effect on one pole without effecting the other.

Anyhow good effort with the IPMM MAN once again.

ponder this:

A disc elevated able to spin with bearing as it spins it brings up 4 neo's at 90 degree intervals right on time having the proper sides shielded .....

Look at the build of a sterling engine to better get the picture but at the proper time they will meet opposite poles and push and as it pushes the retract back down then up like a piston....

Why not even ponder using sterling engine to possibly make up for the sticky spots in magnetic motors by using the heat generated from spin and friction I am sure its possible!

The essence of this machine is to alternate the polarities with the two stator movements up en down en back and forward, so that the sticky point is smoothly evaded by the spin of the cakra. Shielding I have found not necessary in this set-up as yet. But maybe in some respect of the evolution of this machine it will surface, that is very well possible... Harnessing heat sterling-wise is not directly the purely magnetic proof we are after. There will rather be cooling than heating once we suck the gravitons. The overunity is supposed to defeat the friction. But maybe that what you suggest proves the setup right in the end, that might very well be so.