IPMM MAN-device for the proof of magnetic overunity.

[sparks]

       It's peculiar that an induction motor can deliver torque up to 90 percent efficiency.  The other 10 percent is lost as heat from the windings and bearings and steel cooling fan and conductor heating noise both mechanical and electrical.  These motors don't even utilize the b magnetic field produced by the winding coils and often this field results in stator tooth heating and end lamination heating.  I don't think it would take too much redesign to push it over the top.
    No where in this motor design is it taken into account the intrinsic energy of the mass. A piece of copper wire is not without potential energy stored in it's atomic lattice as is the iron void of intrinsice energy.

[AnandAadhar]

Maybe i'll reopen the IPMM case with an 5.0 version of implementing the Achilles Ligeras/Dave Squires concept. So the loop would be pulsed by the piston that is placed in response to the cakra pulsing off-center. Will it work? I'll try a design and keep you posted if it does.
see threads:
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=5671.new#new
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=5674.0;topicseen

AA

I have posted a YouTube movie on design IPMM 5.0. In this design I have added a Squires drive to alternate the feedback. That results in a working model. In this I add up the cakra-pulse to the pulse of the Squires drive. That offers a wave function in which the peak might lead to an OU effect. The control function in 5.0 is served by gravity in the form of a pendant. That offers an extra need to tune the frequencies. As yet I have not succeeded to sufficiently control this complicated wave function and deliver proof of OU with the IPMM. What is won though is a machine with a reasonable pulse control and spin down. The best version thus far. Stephan commented on YouTube that the design would be too complicated. Yes simplicity is a wanted thing, but I need to try to add the two pulses with gravity now and that is an evolutionary complication of the IPMM that is given by my course. We'll see if I can get it simple.  At the other hand I also have thought to need the skills of a clock maker to control the stator/rotor difference in forces to have it chase its own reaction force. That certainly wouldn't be a simple matter. Ever tried to disassemble and reassemble a clock mechanism? Think of Findsud's complicated balancing game to achieve the selfrunning status with magnetism and gravity...
Under the thread of the similar ALME drive I have posted a suggestion for a replication. I'm not sure what I'll do next IPMM or ALME. For ALME the video proof is lacking, so a replication would be an off-side offense in terms of soccer, not?

See :
YouTube for IPMM 5.0:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X2pdnkfrNv0
URL of the suggested ALME replication:
http://theorderoftime.com/science/free_energy/support-files/ALME-repl.html
Sterling's ALME thread:
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=5674.0;topicseen
Magnet motor real? (ALME/Squires discussion):
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=5671.0;topicseen
My free energy research pages:
http://theorderoftime.com/science/free_energy/index.html

[AnandAadhar]

I have loaded an analysis of Finsrud's device with my conclusions about the basic principles of the device. This led to a version IPMM 6. This version is still under construction. What is demonstated was just to explain the basic principles of the 'Finsrud-accord' to work with IPMM 6.
Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E9GucVwc36Q

[The_Jerk]

I love the original.  Lots of duct tape and rough cut plastic, this is what the world waits for in engineers, physicists and all pioneers of technology.  People absolutely have to be completely outside the book on physics since they really don't know shit.  Even Einstein only caught on to like .9 percent of all human knowledge.  The information has to combined with common sense to be pushed forward.  I believe that traditional educations run people into walls of possibility and grind down the imagination which, all these assholes seem to forget, is why we have physics and math in the first place.  Advancement has always been the keen observance of nature.  That first video is an example of why other life forms are even interested in us, it's because of our ingenuity.  The so called great minds are usually bought and paid for and the rogue scientists are shunned by their community, just like Tesla was.  We should all look to his work for guidance, even though the feds stole almost all of it when he died.  We are close here, very close!  I have seen many designs and devices that are on the head of the universal needle

[Ergo]

We are close here, very close!  I have seen many designs and devices that are on the head of the universal needle

But still light years away because this device was never even close to be working....