Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of this Forum, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above
Thanks to ALL for your help!!


The TPU uncovered? (A PROBABLE technique.)

Started by pauldude000, April 09, 2008, 08:35:14 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

AhuraMazda

@Otto,
I am sure you used to be a "square wave" guy but now you have changed to a "sine wave" guy. What is the reason for changing?

AM

pauldude000

@Loner

Mental laziness. That is why I mixed the signal together in my mind before injecting it into the crossover. However, I see possibles for both situations, now that you mentioned it. Your concept of signal reinforcement (one signal buttressing another if there is say oscillator variance) is a seeming benefit for the one feed-wire approach. Yet, if the oscillator signals were added AFTER the crossover, then they may prevent a signal degradation I envision as a possibility. (Possible signal blending into a misshapen single signal.)

You could try the OP-AMP Circuit, maybe even phase lock (PLL) the suckers... at this point I am guessing as much as you. What I do know is that the frequencies HAVE to be separable for their respective control coils. Tuned control coils will take care of the rest, by damping out non-harmonics.

A coil is tuned by wire length in respect to fractional frequency period. (From my tesla coil days.) Frequencies can more easily be tuned to the coil, but in this special case DO NOT DO IT! The frequencies are not accidental. If the applied frequencies are not close enough to what is needed... the magnetic field WILL NOT ROTATE. It is the phase angles of the respective frequencies which cause the field to rotate.

If you choose a three wire method, also note that the output wires from the respective amplifiers be EXACTLY the same length. (I don't know why, but my mental imagery is insisting.)

I just thought of it, but wouldn't it help to have the collector coil wound bifiliar as well?

Paul 

Finding truth can be compared to panning for gold. It generally entails sifting a huge amount of material for each nugget found. Then checking each nugget found for valuable metal or fool's gold.

pauldude000

I am going to have to call it a night. It is almost 3:00 in the morning here, and I am developing a migraine. Mental sledgehammer is starting to dent rusty mental gears I think. Catch you all tomorrow, and have a good night all!

Paul
Finding truth can be compared to panning for gold. It generally entails sifting a huge amount of material for each nugget found. Then checking each nugget found for valuable metal or fool's gold.

aleks

Why not just take a 3-phase motor and replace its rotor with a coil? Guess it won't work, because this overunity FX is not about rotating mag field. Rotating mag field may cause ether inertia effects to manifest, but do you really think it produces electric potential higher than what you have on your coils?

aleks

Where sine-waves are coming is from RE potential which changes over time in a kind of "wavelet" (should look like a simple gaussian curve like function, or a single period of sinewave). However the RE potential appears only when pulse is created, you CANNOT create RE potential with a sinewave. This potential wavelet is caused by a DC wave formation. This is confirmed by Otto's findings in his TPU-ECD profile.

So, the only realistical reasoning for phase-sync of pulses I see is the requirement to line-up the DC potential wavelets so that they create a continuous AC output. But actually, you do not need three coils. A correctly spaced sequence of these wavelets creates a perfect sinewave by itself. Meaning you may not need more than a single control coil pulsed at a correct frequency which is actually depends on the pulse RISE time, not on anything else.

To put it in different words, you may differentiate the pulse front and you'll see the waveform which is approximated by Dirac delta function which by itself carries a DC energy. From theory, the narrower the pulse the higher the energy this pulse carries and thus the more DC energy is radiated leading to a heavier "effect".