The TPU uncovered? (A PROBABLE technique.)

[otto]

Hello all,

@AM

as always a very good question from you.

Marco showed us once how the output signal looks like: A SINE WAVE AND ON TOP OF THIS A KICK!!!

When I burned all my equipment, a long time ago, I had the same signal.

Now suppose we have a only sine wave feeded into our coils. What have we? NOTHING! We must have a voltage connected to our coils.

Now suppose the sine wave AND a DC, say +12VDC. What happens?

AS AN END RESULT WE HAVE SINE WAVES + KICKS ON TOP OF THIS SINE WAVES!!!!

I hope I was clear enough for ALL the builders here.

I knew a long time that I have to use a combination of AC and DC in my coils but I thought I had to use square waves and 12VAC from the heating supply from the tubes. As I builded "something" like oscillators with tubes I saw  big sine waves on the plate of my tube. So why not to use this sine waves?

In this way I saw that I need sine waves from the oscillator and a +xxDCV from my power supply.

On the other hand:

if we have square waves from our oscillators, then we need an AC voltage for powering the coils.

In this way would the TPU convert the squares into sines, as I saw it, and then you have the "success"!! As I see it, to work in this way is an aditional job for the TPU because the squares have to be converted. Of course, only at, or near the right frequency mix.

In short:

sine wave + DC

or

square wave + AC

Otto

[aleks]

Another useful idea about pulsing and RE sine-waves ("wavelets") is that they are MONOPOLE power-source themselves and should be treated as such. It is different from batteries or grid power. Actually, so much different that you won't read theory about them.

The oscillation visible after the pulse front (I'm referring to Fig.37 of TPU_ECD_V1_0 pdf file http://www.intalek.com/Index/Projects/Research/otto_ronette_TPU_ECD-V1_0.pdf) are probably some inter-atomic oscillations. The same applies to "seed" oscillations. As revealed by Otto, they depend on the metal combination.

Well, I myself was assuming that RE potential field should be always "ideal" like on Fig.29, but reality is much more complex as usual: such RE (gravity-antigravity) potential field of course causes reactive (probably phonon-based) behavior within the matter itself (Fig.44). Nevertheless, extracting almost ideal sinewave output is possible (Fig.42).

I really think that Otto have 'nailed' the effect, especially considering his claims of achieving independent control over square wave and surplus sinewave output.

Seems like MOSFET is the key here - its amplification and spark-like behavior are what I thought should work well. Square waves are just a trigger to MOSFET. So, this should be even better than "saw-tooth" wave I was referring often to. The sync between sine-wave wavelets and MOSFET spikes is a mystery to me, but this should have some kind of explanation.

I think we need more replications.

[sparks]

    In an induction motor winding one coil is wound cw and one ccw.  The coils are then placed in the stator 180 degrees apart.  The magnetic field is produced around the conductors in adjacent slots.  1/2 of which belong to opposite coils.
The coils are not solenoidal.  The magnetic circuit penetrates the air gap into the rotor iron back into the stator steel through the back iron and back to the air gap again.  On each current reversal the magnetic circuit reverses.  To get torque the magnetic flux needs to be shifted so a second winding is installed 90 degrees relative to the first.  Capacitors in series with this second winding or auxillary winding cause a leading current in this winding.  So the magnetic flux shifts from this secondary windings slot conductors towards the main winding conductors.
  I put this in this thread because the tpu is using pulsed solenoids so that the electrical displacement of the signals becomes more of a function of the circumference of the tpu.  I picture the tpu as having what one could call a peristalsic effect.  This is quite unique to any generating or transforming circuit  I know of.  The resulting magnetic field of the collector windings would seem to reinforce the electrical pulse flow around the control windings.  Now you have a magnetic field and electrical field in harmony within the control coil.  And the beat goes on.

[aleks]

Another thing everyone should seriously consider is that in signal synthesis terms it is IMPOSSIBLE to produce a single period of sine-wave having square wave or saw-tooth wave input. Only a sort of LINEAR PHASE filter may produce such waveform from a unit impulse. Linear-phase filters are hard to do in analog, they are more of a DSP concept. This 'period of sine-wave' is clearly NOT born in the circuitry or by means of this circuitry's elements, it simply can't (analog circuits are causal, they can't predict what kind of signal will be next, so they can't produce sine-wave rise front - well, sine-wave can be produced if you apply 4x order low-pass filtering, but here we see that in some case there are 2.5 sinewave cycles happen for each square wave pulse). I gave a possible answer of where it is born: this single period of sine-wave is a result of potential field that appears for a moment and which is created by DC acoustic wave (or scalar wave, or radiant energy) force field formation. I believe it is a monopole meaning it has an equal potential on both ends. In this respect it becomes an electrical energy source, and it should be connected to 0 or ground (or any other potential) whereas its ends can be connected together to form a closed loop.

[Grumpy]

Once again the RMF rears it's ugly head, like Nessie out of Loch Ness...