The TPU uncovered? (A PROBABLE technique.)

[giantkiller]

@erfinder,

This concludes my hijacking of this tread.......

Argh there laddie. Tiss a gut run you had there no?
When ya be getting 'round to it agin, we'll be readin with full sails aloft!
and don't let the parrot crap down your shoulder.

That's pirate talk if'n ya didn't know.

--giantkiller.

[sparks]

@Grumpy


    The speed of light compared to the speed of infrared compared to the speed of xrays.  E=mc2 is dead.  Speed implies time as a physical plane not a plane of awareness.  Good model but it's getting kinda ridiculous when you see what established science goes through to balance an equation that relies on a CHANGING CONSTANT.  What are they looking for now in their billion dollar particle accelerators.  Bosuns?   Take those monstors and turnem into bigold tpu's.  Time much better spent.

   I included a diagram below to demonstrate in out.  Before you roll the flat universe into a sphere cylinder to create 3d,  the tempic field or field of energy densisty can be conceptualized by moving the flat plane diagram into the screen.  As you move it in,the circle signifying the vortex end facing you will expand and contract as you approach a node or antidnode of the in/out  vortices.  This will cause a dialation of the circle depending on  how far in you go or out you go.  Densisty depending on this perpendicular plane relationship.  SM said the Earth has an inherent frequency.  I believe that this frequency is one of expansion and contraction of the Earth's energy density index.  She's got an electromagnetic heatbeat all her own ! 

[ramset]

     Some attraction in Nature  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=adYbFQFXG0U&feature=related  Chet

[allcanadian]

@sparks
Your pictures and terminology seem to be getting more and more complex , I think that if there is one lesson we can learn from nature it is than it is based on absolute simplicity.

@ramset
I think we can see millions of examples of attraction in nature, but is what we are "seeing" attraction or the illusion of attraction. For example the "attraction of gravity", is this matter attracting matter -----or two matter fields interference patterns producing polarization thus repelling external radiation and creating a "lack" of something inbetween the fields. In this case gravity would be a repulsion from the outside inward and there would be no attraction in it. I think what we call attraction may be related to boyancy--- for example is a balloon filled with air while submerged underwater attracted to the surface or repelled from the water? In this case air in the submerged balloon would seem be seeking a similar condition in the air above the water, is this attraction or external conditions (water pressure) forcing similar conditions ( air pressures) together--repulsion? I would tend to agree with erfinder that there may be no force of attraction, I have absolutely no proof of this but a great number of things I have come to understand seem to point in that direction.

[ramset]

All canadian  thankyou for the explanation   even if it makes my head hurt   but I can see your point   Chet