HIGH QUALITY TPU DVD Video Released from Jack Durban

[Grumpy]

@ BEp and pinestone - very interesting

[pinestone]

I haven't had a Twinkie in about 30 years.

Good- I was hoping you were just kidding !

The first part of that post was a sick attempt at playing the naysayer.

I didn't take it as such, only as an observation

I fully expected your lense to show what I described on the Trinitron.
My reasoning is from the graphics you have supplied I really don't think your lens shows the magnetic field. Rather, it shows the direction and dispersion of the charge flux due to the magnetic field.
Notice how your lens shows a reversal of color from top to bottom.

Actually, the colors are from the CRT. The image of my lens has white 'arms' similar to my avatar.
When I get back to the lab tomorrow, I'll post these images separately so we can see their differences, as well as their similarities.

If a charged particle approaches the northern half of a magnet it will go around that magnet in one direction. If it approaches the southern half of the magnet it will go around the other direction.
The Trinitrons don't show the magnetic field. They show the dielectric field because they have no shadow mask.
Dissimilar CRTs show the magnetic field because there is a shadow mask to magnetize.

I somewhat agree. However, the Trinitron has a wire micro-grid that the magnet induces its field into- a much more linear and graphical representation as opposed to the metal shadow-mask 'candy dish' type of display.

The division shown between the two poles (with your lense) is surely the Bloch wall, I agree.

If you follow the bright area from pole to pole it's apparent that there is a mobius 'standing wave' that 'twists' around the magnet. This image shows it better: http://www.nanomagnetics.us/Helical%20flux.JPG
When viewed parallel to the light source, the helix is apparent. The previous image is perpendicular.
Like I said earlier, it's the lowest potential of the field. Bear in mind that I'm not disagreeing with you, but providing more detailed information.

Imagine if you could look at the Earth with your lense. Folks would likely find your pics a reason to understand the difference of predominant weather and ocean current direction.

Yea, I used to say "If I could only make a pair of eyeglasses with these lenses, and make them sensitive enough, we could see the Earths magnetic field".

This perception I have makes me think there is nothing anomolous about your results but I think your lense is a fantastic tool anyway. It is certainly a mass improvement over Kirlian photography.

Thanks for the compliment. I don't get many of them. The physics community has been ignoring me for almost 4 years now. Published papers fall to the bottom of the pile and I've been banned from forums because my work doesn't fit with the established curriculum. My most recent blog posts were deleted and my threads get locked.
I must say it's refreshing to chat with open minded people such as yourself.

If applying an electric charge to the area viewed by your lense is not being done then you are seeing the moving charges that surround us.

I'm not 100% sure what you mean here. They are made from two glass disks with a ferrofluid mixture between, backlit or edgelit with various types of light sources. They do, however, display a similar view with an electromagnet -as well with a magnet.

Yes folks, I am crazy. No need for flame wars. I submitted to being insane several decades ago 

After working and researching the functions of these lenses for 4 years, I'm most probably crazier than you could ever be. Trying to get the attention of the physics community is the worse part of this whole procedure. I appreciate and enjoy the feedback.

Sorry this thread is so off topic. I'll refrain from my ranting and start a new thread about the lenses soon & we can discuss them in greater detail.

[Jon]

This TPU is based on the 6″ model demonstrated by Steven Mark in one of his videos. The control circuit drives three lines up to 15v but currently between 7 and 12v. The control coil outputs are fed
back into the controller using a simple implementation of a Tesla switch to facilitate a rotating field.A positive observation so far is that when I disconnect the input power to the cycling power (not the control circuitry) the oscillations drop about half as fast as when the control coil outputs are not connected to anything. Currently a devastating problem is with the diodes placed throughout the cycle each one incurring a .7v drop at up to 20Mhz this adds up to a lot of waste.This design attempts to provide a method of rotating a charge field around the TPU so that the input power is conserved and not used directly in the output. This should allow for a self running opertaion.     



The image of the scope shows the input from one of the three control coils. The input is 7.5v square wave but notice that the scope shows about 20v peak to peak. I think this is the kick Steven Mark talked about. When only a single control coil is connected the input will show the 7v square wave and the output about 14v sign wave. Because all three control coils are connected the input is receiving a signal from the other coils. 


Any comments are welcome...
http://freeenergygroup.com/?page_id=109

[wattsup]

@Jon

Just great work. Nice web site. Really lots of work went into all you are doing and your devotion is obvious. Thanks for your work. I know we will have alot of questions for you.

@all

Look at this image I grabbed at 4:01 from a Tesla YouTube located here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wOvtckNKWQc&feature=related
I would like one day to visit the Tesla museum.

It was doodled by Tesla on a notepad.
You can see it better on YouTube using the full screen.
Pretty freaky how it resembles a TPU.

[miroslav]

@ wattsup
if  you visit the Tesla museum (belgrade) some  things is not shown (not enough space),you should ask people who work there
but it is very impressive to see all that stuff TRUST ME