HIGH QUALITY TPU DVD Video Released from Jack Durban

[jdurban]

@EM

Oh yes Bedini...Mr. "Radiant Energy" Sounds like an Avon product. We wonder why most mainstream engineers run when they hear this stuff.

[Grumpy]

How does all of this fit with SM's comment that Tao "has the secret" - which supports an RE explanation:

I want to mention about something I read on the site.
A person named TAO wrote this to you a while back:

>As a gesture of good faith towards you and the rest I'll throw out some insights...
Lets talk about the 'kick.' When the old Edison DC generators were turned on, back in the day, they released this 'kick' and killed many workers in the process. A man by the name of Tesla had seen this. He wondered how and why this 'kick' would occur. So he experimented with wire and disruptive discharges from capacitors. It was found by him that this kick could be made so powerful that it could explode wires instantly. This kick came out of the wires perpendicularly. He discharged capacitors into stout wire and through a spark gap. The key to the kick's strength and appearance was in how fast Tesla discharged the capacitors into the spark gap AND how fast Tesla STOPPED the flow of current AT the spark gap. Tesla used all types of devices to stop this flow of current, magnets, a flame, counter-rotating engines. His goals were to get the time in which the discharge is STOPPED to be much quicker. As Tesla did this he found that the perpendicular radiations, the ones from the wires, caused electrical effects to appear in wires and other copper/metal materials near the STOPPED current/discharge. These electrical effects could be made to create electrons on other wires and copper around his STOPPED current/discharge wire.

So, based on those things, lets look at the Mark device. Lets say Steven put one big stout cable around or in the rings,and all around these he had many many windings. Now, if Steven put into that stout cable a current and before the current could get to the end of the wire, he stopped it's flow abruptly, then perpendicular radiations (the KICKS), the same Tesla observed, would appear and spread from this stout cable, this would cause Tesla'a copper charging effect, which would hit all the other wires in Steven's coils. Now, if Steven wired the coils right and stopped the discharge of the current through the coils he would be able to extract a lot of extra energy from the tap points on the coils. This is basically how Tesla's magnifying transmitter works.

Capacitors discharged ABRUPTLY into a wire, then the current flow is stopped ABRUPTLY before the current makes it to the end of the wire, and this KICK comes out of the wires perpendicularly. This KICK would then charge copper with electrons(hot electricity) or their opposites(cold electricity). It just depends on how you setup the device.

So, I would say that Steven's KICKS have a direct relationship to Tesla's Magnifying Transmitter, its REAL operation.<

So Lindsay, this guy definitely has the secret. I do not know if he will be able to duplicate power generation, but he does have the secret.
Do you think he knows it?
The only part he doesn't have any idea about is that by starting the oscillation you cause the current to flow in the collector which causes the magnification of the process within the collector which will ultimately produce the greater voltage and power in usable amounts during operation.
Lindsay, it is so VERY hard to describe things with words!

[turbo]

But i would say the other wire is to cancel out part of the flux so the result travels in one direction.

It may cancel out a part of the flux induced by pulses only if it carries the same signal in an opposite direction. If that's the case, where is the load collector? Beside that cancelling the flux created by pulses will obviously nullify any magnetic induction so there won't be any magnetic field building up.

Hey i said PART of the flux.
Fire up a coil and disconnect it.
Then you have movement in TWO directions.
We don't want this cause we want movement in ONE direction.
So we need to cancel out one half of the cycle.
People say this cannot be done because we will always have this opposing force.
I am sure you know what law i am reffering to.
Pherhaps cancelling out isn't the right name.
It should have been called "redirected feedback"
Collect the opposing force, and at the same time feed it back in only from the other side of the second coil.
It will still be there and it will still be opposite but it will create the apperance as it is moving in one direction.
At least that is what i could see.

M.

[EMdevices]

Oh yes Bedini...Mr. "Radiant Energy" Sounds like an Avon product. We wonder why most mainstream engineers run when they hear this stuff.

LOL        

yeah, I don't buy all his theories,  I've wasted too much time with his concepts in the past.

EM

[Grumpy]

Perhaps it is just a creative way of saying to use a unidirectional pulse.