HIGH QUALITY TPU DVD Video Released from Jack Durban

[jdurban]

If my current train of thought is correct then one of the three conductors of the twin-lead windings is a portion of the collector. That would be the one in-between bifilar control coil conductors.

could you elaborate? are you alluding to a trifilar winding?

always thought the control winding on the otpu was that clear-type speaker wire; 2-conductor

@ Jack. are you able to add anything here as to what those control windings were based on what you saw? any wire going underneath? was it simple 2-conductor speaker wire, was there a 3rd conductor along side?
thanks

Can't help you on that one. It's been over ten years now.

[BEP]

could you elaborate? are you alluding to a trifilar winding?

always thought the control winding on the otpu was that clear-type speaker wire; 2-conductor

@ Jack. are you able to add anything here as to what those control windings were based on what you saw? any wire going underneath? was it simple 2-conductor speaker wire, was there a 3rd conductor along side?
thanks

Not alluding. Been saying it for months. It is obvious to me even before the better pics were posted - so is the counter handedness. Now that better pics of the 'FTPU' are here this gives me the similarities of form and now, I believe, function between all TPUs.
Yes, it is probably speaker wire. The third conductor should be the same wire 'zipped' apart. I'm familiar with that wire - as stated earlier. To the unfamiliar eye it looks the same as indoor 300 ohm twin-lead - and actually could be just that. The speaker wire version was a bit larger.
As for the consist of the mounting form - that is just another piece that now fits in each TPU puzzle. If the spool was metal it would likely heat up quickly if not prevent function completely.
None of my opinions can be confirmed, yet.

[aleks]

its a combination of a motor and a generator that runs itself

Looks like so. However, is rotation a necessity if not just for the sake of scalability and higher output? I mean, can this OU thing be replicated with a single pulse coil and a single collector coil so that operation can be confirmed without going into a lot of other complexities?

[jdurban]

@JD,

This is also from SM pdf, I know you don't think any of his info is credible, but I just wanted you to think about this:-


Quote from SM:-

".....necessary to make the demonstrations you see on the video tapes available today. So in many ways we have early RCA color TV engineers to thank for my discovery of the power generator. I am sure they are all dead now but they did contribute........."

So I did some research and found:-
http://www.rmcybernetics.com/science/high_voltage/voltage_mult.htm

Three stage CW multipliers, commonly known as tripler, were used in most of the early B&W and colour TV's. The voltage drops rapidly as a function of the output current. In some applications, this is an advantage. The output V/I characteristic is roughly hyperbolic, so it serves well for charging capacitor banks to high voltages at roughly constant charging power. Furthermore, the ripple on the output, particularly at high loads, is quite high.

Increasing the frequency can dramatically reduce the ripple, and the voltage drop under load, which accounts for the popularity of driving a multiplier stack with a switching power supply. A clever way to reduce ripple is to implement a full wave voltage doubler as shown below. This effectively doubles the number of charging cycles per second, and thus cuts down the voltage drop and ripple factor. The input is usually fed from a centre tapped ac transformer or MOSFET H-bridge circuits.

You can find more detailed information regarding this subject by visiting Blaze Labs   :-http://www.blazelabs.com/e-exp15.asp:-


SM mentioned about the imploding tv set which killed a young boy, tv sets have high voltage systems in them, so its logical to think that this maybe the other piece of the puzzle. Plus the output dispalyed on SM multimeter is DC in nature

Are you aware at all of this story?

And again from SM:-
".......Energy conversion is different when you consider speed. 12 volts at 100 amps is slow and the energy can not dissipate quickly enough to kill you by discharge. But, it is a lot of energy especially if converted to speed. Reduce that 100 amps to 100 mA but increase the voltage (speed) to 100,000 volts and you can electrocute someone!
My unit operates on these principles. Think about all those frequencies traveling inside the collector coil and how they interact....."

I have a cct of a small high voltage dc to dc converter from electronics cookbook, using 555 timer, diagram attached, now my take on this is what if we were to use a small enough transformer inside the first tpu, and the output of that fed into the ring configuration, so basically my question would be, was there at that time a small enough transformer that could be placed inside the first two tpu's which would be concealed?

In a nutshell you have to take everything SM says with a grain of salt. SM is not an engineer but a tinkerer who didn't understand much of what he was doing. Like most tinkerers that attempt to explain  phenomenon with tortured logic and unconventional terminology. SM's blatherings can change on any given day or moon phase. I would not invest much time in looking for any hidden clues in SM's dissertations.

And again, this device was real and did function. At some point this site should be divided into two groups to streamline the processing of data

Group one = Yes the design worked and let's find a way to replicate it.

Group two= No this was a scam and used batteries and the moon landing was a hoax.

Maybe a third group= I know this is a fraud but I can't reveal my sources because they are voices in my head.

It's time to separate the men from the boys here and get moving forward. Sorry SM, the statement "separate the men from the boys" was not intended as a physical act.

[poynt99]

Yes, it is probably speaker wire. The third conductor should be the same wire 'zipped' apart. I'm familiar with that wire - as stated earlier. To the unfamiliar eye it looks the same as indoor 300 ohm twin-lead - and actually could be just that. The speaker wire version was a bit larger.

ah heck, believe what you will.