Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



HIGH QUALITY TPU DVD Video Released from Jack Durban

Started by Jdo300, April 14, 2008, 02:40:29 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 20 Guests are viewing this topic.

aleks

Quote from: Grumpy on April 22, 2008, 09:39:19 AMIf it makes it easier to accept, "dispacement current" is still a current.
Yep, it is... Imagine that abrupt discharge creates RE (comp) field. This strongly displaces existing magnetic field, but since core is slow, this displacement results in a pretty relaxed kick that immediately follows pulse. Make the core fast and you'll likely won't notice anything since your core won't have any energy in it by the time when the discharge fires. So, I would suggest before performing any tests make sure your core is slow, that it sustains magnetic/electric field after each pulse so that next pulse can interfere with some field. I may be wrong, of course, but that's an idea to consider.

aleks

Quote from: Grumpy on April 22, 2008, 10:54:03 AMalways uses a capacitor for storage.
I think it's a requirement. Nothing (beside maybe avalanche MOSFET) can push so much current in a single pulse. Capacitor discharges logarithmically which makes it possible to estimate the peak energy output of each pulse and length of the pulse, knowing capacitor's rating. I guess most guys here are playing with toyish discharges that do not make any difference except on the o-scope. It's a dangerous biz in fact. 5000 pulses per second with 100mJ each pulse equals to 500 W*s power.

Grumpy

Eric Dollard's video on Longitudinal Electricity where he demonstrates radiant energy:

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=eric+dollard+longitudinal+electricity+video

(pick one - it has been loaded to several locations)

It is the men of insight and the men of unobstructed vision of every generation who are able to lead us through the quagmire of a in-a-rut thinking. It is the men of imagination who are able to see relationships which escape the casual observer. It remains for the men of intuition to seek answers while others avoid even the question.
                                                                                                                                    -Frank Edwards

sparks

   The capacitor is used to collect the pulsed energy.   You can take an avalanche diode and put it downstream of a capacitor and create a spike which is then directed to interfere with mass and disresonate the mass.  Then collect the photon phonons potential energy whatever you want to call translatory energy,  on a capacitor or a collector winding or a radio receiver steel antennae or some salt water or an x-ray exposure plate or on a....................  .  It is not the energy of the spike that you are collecting.  Alecks the SPIKE IS A CATALYST.   The ambient magnetic field restores resonance to the mass that just shook off a little potential energy and you are back in business.
Is it necessary to define a catalyst?
Think Legacy
A spark gap is cold cold cold
Space is a hot hot liquid
Spread the Love

OzOnE

Quote from: Grumpy on April 22, 2008, 09:10:43 AM
Until you discover this "effect", you're just wasting your time.

@Grumpy, I agree that even if we had the schematics and even a method of building a working device, will still wouldn't necessarily know the true principles behind it's operation, but surely this is what we're all aiming for? Whether we look for the theory first, or try to reverse-engineer the "original" devices by looking at the available information thus far, we're still trying to achieve the same goal?

@EMdevices - yes, I think there would be more information in the interlaced frames, and it's difficult to see detail when the two fields are blended (even with the best deinterlacers.) I never thought of duplicating the fields, then looking at both fields separately. I know you were discussing viewing the separate fields, but what did you mean when you said that Jack's video is already deinterlaced though? (The DVD VOB files are definitely interlaced?)