HIGH QUALITY TPU DVD Video Released from Jack Durban

[Janus20]

@ Sparks

Have you read this?
http://electrodynamics.org.uk/
http://www.unifiedtheory.org.uk/

There is something useful?
I'll wait your posts

Thanks
Turz

I submitted www.electrodynamics.co.uk/ to Peswiki yesterday. I was astonished at 1100 hits over 24 hours. The GoStats page rating shot up from 298 to 15
but it really means very little indeed.

I received not a single e-mail and only 5 people scanned the associated forum threads. The information is clearly seen as superficial entertainment only.

[wattsup]

@squirrel

We won't tell LM if you don't. lol
Welcome regardless.

In the OTPU video there is a first part and a second part. So I guess you are referring mostly to the second part where he wants to show the OTPU operation without the plug box.

As for the handling of lamp cords, I think you are saying that if the lights were loaded with batteries, the lamp cords would have current in them and risk of a possible shock if he touched the prongs. I don't know. When he moves the lamps by the top shade ring loop, and since those loops are only held by two small sliding tubes, I wonder if this is strong enough to hold so much battery weight. You can also see when he moves them that he is not over exerting himself and his fingers don't seem to be under extreme tension. Then again how much battery would you need to shoot that video.

For sure, the way he handles the plugs is suspicious, especially when he held one of the plugs pinched in his right hand fingers with the thumb held out of the way, like to not shock it. And when he put them on the floor about a foot apart. He had to make a conscious effort to do that. I do that all the time when I have two live wires.

Yes the wall outlet could have been just two dummy resistor equipped plugs. 

Question: You have a lamp that is plugged into AC line wall outlet. As you unplug the lamp, the questions are what will happen with AC and what will happen with DC. If anyone can answer this, and say there is a difference when you unplug an AC lamp compared to a DC lamp, then you can compare it to the video and have the answer.

While the plug is being pulled, there was a fraction of a second or so of looseness between the plug pins and the outlet.

Here is what I think will happen but I did not try this. I'll let someone else do it.

In AC I expect while the plug is being pulled, if there was any other interplay between the connections, the AC lamp would either be full on or off at every iteration. More or less contact will not make any difference in how bright the lamp lites.

In DC I expect while the plug is being pulled, if there was any other interplay between the connections, the DC lamp brightness would gradually go brighter gradually go lower as the connection increases. It would get brighter with more connection and less brighter with less connection.

Whatever it is, each will have their own signature that could be compared to the video. This could close the subject either way.

Also, after he plugs them into the wall, you see how bright the lamps are. This gives you the principal visual reference level. Then when he plugs the OTPU, everyone notices the OTPU is lighting the lamps yes, but lower then when they were plugged into the wall. When we see 91 volts, we then accept the notion that the OTPU is putting OUT less voltage then the wall outlet and that is why the lamp lites less bright, lol. This distracts from the notion that if the lamp had batteries, it would in fact light brighter when plugged into the wall compared to when it was plugged on the added load of the OTPU. lol This would also explain why those scrawny four windings got hot to the touch. lol

Also when he plugged the second lamp onto the OTPU, this gives the impression that the device is putting OUT double the power, on demand. lol

He puts the meter on the OTPU. He never puts the meter on the load, hence the lamps. I think this would be a prerequesite when doing future demos. Put a meter on the load and show 0 volts when the switch is one way or the other.

So there is in fact a very good possibility that the OTPU never worked but as Jack said, he was looking for something else to attract his investors. Most likely, the TPU worked but not OU and he needed to go to the next level which became the small Donuts. Maybe the TPU made 45 volts of the 91 and batteries in the lamps closed the next level.

Question: Do you need less DC volts compared to AC volts to produce the same luminosity.

Then again, there is the other possibility that the device really works and further observation is the next choice. Which we are all doing now.

Good call.

@All

I am in the process of producing a comprehensive FTPU wiring diagram and when you see where the wires are going to and from the circuit boards, coils and loop rings, etc., this will give you a better understanding on how the device is put together. I took me a few days just to figure out how to portray the wiring in four levels (top up, top under, bottom up and bottom under) and decided finally to do it as if you had a 4 layer circuit board always looking from the top. This has simplified how to show the wiring perspective and is very revealing.

@otto

It will be worth it to wait another few days for this.

[plengo]

I thought this was relevent to TPU.  http://montalk.net/notes/tesla-wireless-technology

Fausto.

[FatBird]

Nice diagrams.

[innovation_station]

hey guys got a question for you all!!

if we have say low voltage and high amparage say like a car battery ...  12vdc x amps what is the polar oppsite to low voltage high amparage well it has to be hivoltage low amparage... do batteryies and caps not work as translating devices??

if this is the case could you not just......


ist