HIGH QUALITY TPU DVD Video Released from Jack Durban

[zapnic]

hello hello

he he he "mystery coil "
http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,3403.msg58263.html#msg58263


"Has anyone ever done any research on what happens when we
create a magnetic field and revolve it faster and faster.
What changes and at what speed or frequency of the pulsed field
do things suddenly change?"
so what happens?
some tesla stuff
"The result will, of course, largely depend on the resistance and geometrical dimensions of the path of the resulting eddy current and on the speed of rotation; these elements, namely, determine the retardation of this current and its position relative to the field. For a certain speed there would be a maximum energizing action: then at higher speeds, it would gradually fall off to zero and finally reverse, that is, the resultant eddy current effect would be to weaken the field. The reaction would be best demonstrated experimentally by arranging the fields N S, N' S', freely movable on an axis concentric with the shaft of the disc. If the latter were rotated as before in the direction of the arrow D, the field would be dragged in the same direction with a torque, which, up to a certain point, would go on increasing with the speed of rotation, then fall off, and, passing through zero, finally become negative; that is, the field would begin to rotate in opposite direction to the disc. In experiments with alternate current motors in which the field was shifted by currents of differing phase, this interesting result was observed. For very low speeds of rotation of the field the motor would show a torque of 900 lbs. or more, measured on a, pulley 12 inches in diameter. When the speed of rotation of the poles was increased, the torque would diminish, would finally go down to zero, become negative, and then the armature would begin to rotate in opposite direction to the field-To return to the principal subject; assume the conditions to be such that the eddy currents generated by the rotation of the disc strengthen the field, and suppose the latter gradually removed while the disc is kept rotating at an increased rate. The current, once started, may then be sufficient to maintain itself and even increase in strength, and then we have the case of Sir William Thomson's "current accumulator"."

blaa blaa
http://www.andrijar.com/teslahom/index.html

[wattsup]

@zapnic

Thanks for the link. I remember very well that great thread and I had asked you to expand on that photo with the arrows. lol

Iron wire core toroid would not be hard to do.

@BEP

I just made one with a core of 16awg wire I found yesterday that has a thin plastic coating to increase wire winds. It is 2" diameter spool used for teflon plumbers tape. I wound 25 turns one way then looped reverse another 25 turns.

Do you have any ideas on how to drive this coil. lol

Now after winding this coil, and looking at the TPU toroids and the cleanliness of the winds, it is clear that the TPU toroids were not hand wound.

[BEP]

@Wattsup

You'll appreciate this:

I wound several before I got one that looked fairly good. I wound up using those dognut adapter bushings for plastic pipe. The white stuff heated up at high frequencies so I use the off-white ones. Not a plumber but you probably get my drift.

The dognut has the chamfered top surface and bottom ledge I believe I see in the video. I don't have any now but I'm thinking the goop between the wires is RobRoy ceramic explosion proof conduit fitting sealer. It gets all over everything and dries to a rock hard ceramic. I don't think wire movement is a good thing here.

Looking at your pic the left winding is more dense between 11:30 an 9:00 - exactly opposite on the right wind - dense between 5:30 and 3.

I haven't determined exactly what the hidden winding consists of yet. I think it is likely a heavier wire. As to how it connects to the rest - I don't know.

I do know you can connect one end of the horizontal wind to one end of the perpendicular wind and have intersting scope shots. They are better when you place a radiant source in the center - incandescent bulb, neon light(not quite lit), spark gap, etc. along with dognut mags top and bottom.

You can also just put a resistor across the two white wires - anywhere from a few hundred to a few thousand ohms. If you have a scope connect your probe across this resistor. The white wire circuit should probably be a closed circuit. Then run a few amps of DC through the perp wind. You'll have to experiment on polarities.

Remove the dognut mags and place a small - weak magnet where the outer wind reverses and/or at the 180 end.

I'm using flat pancake coils inside and still experimenting when I have a chance. My next shot will be using the inside wind with much more and smaller wire with high voltage applied to the horizontal wind.

Apply pulses to the outer wind and the resonance drops for the horizontal wind - with the right strength and frequency - dramatically.

[jdurban]

Am I the only one that sees the toroidal chokes as just chokes?

I have watched the video over and over again like everyone else here and all I see is two commonly available chokes with the leads detached to accommodate larger gauge wires that go from the switch poles and back again. This is supported by just following the easily identifiable large white wires that are sent out of the TPU interior to the switch and back from the switch to the TPU only as a means of opening the output of the secondary. This theory is further supported by scale. The smaller unit uses one choke and the larger two. Why? Current. The larger TPU was higher power and thus more load isolation was applied.

The fact that that these inductors are residing in the middle of the device are on no significance other than a little design balance or aesthetics.

Also regarding references to "Sherics". Just do a little study of his reference to the speakers he made and you will find no relevance at all. I even spent an evening reading most of the relevant patents and not a correlation to be had and I read patents for a living.

As far I as could tell reading and re-reading his post there wasn't any transfer of any usable information at all. All I could picture in my mind was Rod Steiger in "Mars Attacks" asking "What  the hell does that mean!"

I realize that this device might partially be outside of known science but I always discount a technical discussion that doesn't use at least a few known and established mathematical references or interpretations!

[poynt99]

Am I the only one that sees the toroidal chokes as just chokes?

Nope  .