HIGH QUALITY TPU DVD Video Released from Jack Durban

[EMdevices]

The issue of DC vs AC output is quite important and needs to be sorted out.

In the LTPU video,  towards the end he says something like  "a 800 Volt DC system",  than Dr Schwinzinger mentions DC measurements in his reports,  however on the contrary, in the OTPU video I believe he says it's DC, then says "actually it has 6000 Hz..." something rather.

Another unrelated observation, regarding rotation,  notice that in the FTPU video,  now we can see his hand mimic rotation just like in the OTPU video, quite interesting...  he has a concept that something rotates, "the turbine effect" he referred to perhaps.

EM

[jdurban]

The issue of DC vs AC output is quite important and needs to be sorted out.

In the LTPU video,  towards the end he says something like  "a 800 Volt DC system",  than Dr Schwinzinger mentions DC measurements in his reports,  however on the contrary, in the OTPU video I believe he says it's DC, then says "actually it has 6000 Hz..." something rather.

Another unrelated observation, regarding rotation,  notice that in the FTPU video,  now we can see his hand mimic rotation just like in the OTPU video, quite interesting...  he has a concept that something rotates, "the turbine effect" he referred to perhaps.

EM

  What if you built a device like this and at the moment it could not run anything with an AC motor in it. Would you say "My device outputs AC power"?  or would you say " My device outputs DC power"?

This comes down to skillful risk management. If my device can't run inductive loads I am going to say it is a DC output device. Why? It's simple. If asked if I can demo a motorized device I can say "no this version is DC only" The AC version is in the lab. See it is an escape clause of sorts.

[poynt99]

ac or dc, which is it?

neither, it's pc, pulsed current

see, it's all semantics. listen to what he says, that's what it is. what you want to call it after that is not important.

[Mr.Entropy]

This comes down to skillful risk management. If my device can't run inductive loads I am going to say it is a DC output device. Why? It's simple. If asked if I can demo a motorized device I can say "no this version is DC only" The AC version is in the lab. See it is an escape clause of sorts.

Or you could tell the truth and say that the induction motor won't run on 6KHz.  I like to think it's DC, because DC is interesting.   For example:

It's well known now that big currents in ferromagnetic materials can push magnetic domain walls around. (google domain wall dragging)   It's not unreasonable to expect a reciprocal effect, that a propagating change in magnetization could push electrons around.  After all, when a domain wall passes a spin-polarized electron, the electron has two choices -- it can either flip or move.

If a rotating field like the one in the Tesla patent you mention was actually pushing electrons around an iron collector wire like a pump, the output would be pulsed DC.

Cheers,

Mr. Entropy

[nickle989]

When he turns the smaller unit upside and it starts to drop voltage rapidly ... this would certainly happen if the device is tuned to part of the earth's spheric flux lines ... going to the cancelation ... we know that magnetic flux helps to carry the electric flow even when the source is stopped .. so why then could it not be that there is enough energy being pulled and already stored ... would lead to reason why slows rapidly but does not stop on a dime ... the earth's frequency has also increased and now thought to be closer to around 8-9 Hz .. the unit would need to be reconfigured from how many turns on the primary / secondary etc.

The AC wave would be the easiest to create an avalanche .. tapping off DC would be easy ... when the wave of AC is about to crest from the inertia the wave starts to stall but the magnet flux would keep the flow going ... now on the wave going down give it a nice push to get it to the point where the flux would then take over again.