Feynman makes a Bedini Motor

[nul-points]

let's see if i get this straight:-

  Professor Evans et al produce a paper supporting energy drawn from 'coiled' space-time as a perfectly valid process & citing the Bedini motor/battery charger as an example

  The Prof, with the support and assistance of other equally heavy-duty scientists (one or more having worked in association with Einstein's team), has managed to complete Einstein's dream of unifying general relativity and Quantum Electrodynamics and now fully believes that, using appropriate techniques, energy can be drawn from the 'vacuum' without violating anything more than a skeptic's pride


dayyum - the poor old Prof must be kicking himself that Mythbusters have so decisively shown that this is an impossibility - it would mean 'Perpetual Motion', after all 


hi Magnerazz - i think it's pretty mean that you've been sitting on this stuff for year!!!   
sandy
Doc Ringwood's Free Energy site  http://ringcomps.co.uk/doc

[utilitarian]

This is a paper on a Bedini replication by doctorate level physicists. They found that it worked as claimed. The physics have been worked out to engineering level. It is overunity and it does not violate conservation of energy. http://www.aias.us/documents/uft/a94thpaper.pdf (it is too big to attach)

I have been following Einstein Cartan Evans unified field theory for over a year now. It is being widely accepted in the industrial physics community of working scientists, but the academic community will not accept it because it steps on some pet 20th century theories, I.E. no black holes and no big bang, no need for dark energy or dark matter. It explains all available empirical observations and experimental data for any branch of physics in a 4d general relativity geometrical model, so no need for extra dimensions or string theory ( which has never produced anything useful anyway) . However ECE has been developed and tested with super computers and is rigorously mathematically correct. All of the well proven laws of classical and quantum physics are recovered as special limits of ECE theory.

The kicker is that ECE predicts the ability to extract energy from space time both gravitationally and electromagnetically thru spin resonance connections. The physical laws involved are of the same mathematical structure as the Coulomb, Ampere-Maxwell, Faraday and Gauss laws of classical electrodynamics with added terms to define the spin connections.

The Bedini motor properly configured produces such a spin resonant connection within the target battery itself. The battery self charges from a spacetime connection. The motor simply produces the resonance conditions necessary for this to take place, it does not supply charge current to the battery.

I am assuming that the good scientists have a perpetually-spinning Bedini motor to accompany their bold conclusions.  What, no?  Hmmmm.

[Magnerazz]

I am assuming that the good scientists have a perpetually-spinning Bedini motor to accompany their bold conclusions.  What, no?  Hmmmm.

Yes they replicated the Bedini patent plans. Understand that this is a greater than 100% COP device, like a heat pump it requires energy input from an isolated source to modulate a larger output from another discrete source. Space time is the relativity theory term for this source of primordial charge density that is an inherent property of the universe. Other theories might call this " Aether" or " Gamma and Beta Atmospheres".  The Bedini motor will not work if connected in a direct loop to its own battery source. However it will charge multiple target batteries which can then be used to power other devices as well as be swapped out to run the motor. But the motor and charge circuits must be isolated and the charger side is not grounded except through the batteries in circuit. There is no earth ground involved.

[utilitarian]

The Bedini motor will not work if connected in a direct loop to its own battery source. However it will charge multiple target batteries which can then be used to power other devices as well as be swapped out to run the motor.

This does not pass logical muster.  If a Bedini motor can charge a target battery, why can't that battery in turn be used to recharge the source batter via another Bedini wheel, thus creating perpetual motion?

[Magnerazz]

The reason is the charge circuit is only over 100% COP over a very narrow range of resonant interactions that actually occur within the battery itself. The output loop and the battery form a resonant tank circuit. Adding any external load will change the resonant condition. The charged battery has to be removed from the charger circuit and utilized to drive a separate discrete load to realize the gain.