Young Bangladeshi Scientist's success story Power generation without fuel

[hartiberlin]

Maybe if someone speaks the language from this country and has contacts
over there, maybe you can contact the inventor and tell him to come
over here and report about his unit ?

We have to hear from first hand reports, not just interpretations from people
who have not seen it yet personally...

Please let us know.
Many thanks.

Regards, Stefan.

[jibbguy]

One possible reason to the "dissapearing acts" of these third-world inventors and their inventions in the past is the IMF and World Bank: In their loans to "developing countries", they are said to have riders in them that prohibit the borrowing country from "developing or implementing any technology which would compete with the use of petrolium as a fuel".

No, i got no proof, just the words of Daniel Dingle and a couple of other souces in the international financial community, as read about on a political blog. The loan terms are always secret, so the average people who live in those countries can't see the terms.

About as much proof as some here have that the inventions are bogus

[pennies_everywhere]

jibbguy you seem to have matters rather backwards.  In order for one to assert a claim that disagrees with established experience, it is up to the claimant to provide evidence in support of their claim.  Kachi does not.  The article does not.  As to your world bank conspiracy theory, you do not.

CoE is readily observable and has been well tested countless times.  If anyone wishes to dispute CoE, it is their burden to supply the verifiable evidence.

One possible reason to the "dissapearing acts" of these third-world inventors and their inventions in the past is the IMF and World Bank: In their loans to "developing countries", they are said to have riders in them that prohibit the borrowing country from "developing or implementing any technology which would compete with the use of petrolium as a fuel".

No, i got no proof, just the words of Daniel Dingle and a couple of other souces in the international financial community, as read about on a political blog. The loan terms are always secret, so the average people who live in those countries can't see the terms.

About as much proof as some here have that the inventions are bogus

[Joh70]

MPI seems to dream a lot:

See MPI-"updates document" from April 2008:

"Existing technology will make possible the wireless transfer of up to 150 kW of power from
parked vehicles, powered by POWERGENIE generators, to the power grid (V2G)."
http://www.magneticpowerinc.com/pdf/POWERGENIE_Technical-progress.pdf

While trying to come to market with Powergenie, they do other stuff:

"Self Powered Systems? include a revolutionary, patent pending, technology, which converts ambient heat into electricity. This non-magnetic breakthrough has the potential to go to production in the near future.  The system has proven capability to recharge batteries from heat extracted from the air; an alternative to the need to plug-in. This technology can also be configured to produce stand-alone power. It can give electric cars unlimited range, as well as turn them into power plants. MPI is also developing breakthrough magnetic energy technologies including POWERGENIE........"
http://www.magneticpowerinc.com/summary.html

Is that serious and can be there be expected something real?

And having a self-runner does NOT automatically mean, that it can be scaled. In each document there is that claim, it can be scaled to MegaWatts. Thats never sure. Perendev maybe has a self-runner for years now, but cannot scale this magnet-motor to serious amount of usable energy. And maybe weakening magnet are the second problem.

The stuff with Ultraconductors from MPI (Superconductors at room temperature) sounds great. Would be a good material to design overunity-devices for sure. But realy ready in OU-devices??? Always claims over claims and unsure conclusions.

This bangladesh thing sounds great. Hopefully the circuit comes out, if not a fake. Who knows?

[allcanadian]

@pennies_everwhere

CoE is readily observable and has been well tested countless times.  If anyone wishes to dispute CoE, it is their burden to supply the verifiable evidence.

What is the Truth when the Truth is unacceptable
The science we know holds true through repetition, that is doing the same things over and over. When people do things that are out of the ordinary very often they achieve extraordinary results which science rarely accepts nor understands.