Young Bangladeshi Scientist's success story Power generation without fuel

[Grumpy]

@Grumpy, lacking answers for questions that are today a matter of existential philosophy does not in the slightest change the collective experience.  The collective experience of mankind is that energy cannot be created or destroyed.  Until there is evidence otherwise one can take CoE to the bank all day long.

WRT Steven Marks, his self-serving claims do not credible evidence make.  If you like to accept claims on faith without the slightest bit of supporting evidence, then perhaps you like to purchase a ride over the Grand Canyon on Mary Yugo's invisible pink unicorn.  I'll be happy to take your deposit.

P_E - the insolent little fukwad.  Always the same empty argument.  CoE is for closed systems and is based on an incomplete understanding on physics, yet you carry it like the Holy Grail. 

No one will ever show you the free energy that we all seak.  Rather than that we will watch you suck the oil-tit to the last drop.  So next time you're bending over at the pump to get your fill - just wonder how things could have been had you not been just another oil company bung hole idiot.

See, all of this free energy stuff that you scoff at has been figured out and replicated for decades and there is no need to prove anything to an insignificant copper-top like you.  The free world is more than happy to let you scrurry along aimlessly paying into the coffers of the oil cartel.  Hell - your ignorance keeps them off our backs!  HA HA ROFLMFAO!!!!

If you every look under th hood of an electric auto - wonder for a second if the batteries are just for show and what that black box really does.  Next time you see an electric meter spinning - suspect that the user actually has a dummy load on the circuit and the real power comes from his convertion unit - the one no one will tell you about - no one will prove - no one will allow to be varified - because it can't exist - LOL!.  When you pass a windmill - wonder if it's fake and produces no power at all, and that littel device that you laughed about provides all of the user's energy needs.

See Pennies, the only one getting conned is you - sucker!

[0c]

Honestly this is not as hard as you think it is once you understand what it is your dealing with.

Please share this great wisdom with us mere mortals.

[poynt99]

@allcanadian, I don't imply.  I state flat-out:  When someone wishes to challenge well evidenced beliefs, it is the claimant's burden to supply credible, and verifiable evidence.  Kachi's demonstration does none of that.

Arguing that any arbitrary claim is worthy of study simply because someone makes it, is complete foolishness.

nobody here makes claims they never prove hahahahaa 

[allcanadian]

@pennies_everywhere

That level can be orders of magnitude lower than at other frequencies.  That increases the coupling of energy.  It doesn't create any.  It doesn't tap the aether.  It doesn't tap ZPE.  It just couples very conventional EM fields.

Correct that is what I told you----energy is conserved
But if you had built some of Teslas patents as I have you would understand these are not conventional EM fields. Can coventional EM fields travel the surface of a single conductor to power a conventional load with near zero losses? Can conventional EM fields power a conventional load in a circuit as if that load did not exist? Tesla liked to use a large self inductance of sufficient capacity to counteract inductive reactance at resonance as well as high potential currents to reduce the capacity required to do this and it was always assumed this was to increase efficiency. What few people have considered however is what might happen if the load offered "no" resistance to currents of proper frequency and potential other than ohmic resistance. In this case what we have considered "work" (watt-seconds)becomes an illusion as the load would appear as nothing more than a straight section of conductor to the circuit.So Yes energy is conserved, there is no need for creating energy, OU, aether, zpe or fairy dust this is basic circuit theory.

[jibbguy]

@Pennies: So you're a Tesla expert, too (you must be quite an amazing fellow)... Then please explain to us what sort of "efficient coupling" is done by use of extensive buried underground antenna arrays; many of us would be very interested to hear the answer to that one.