Roll on the 20th June

[spinner]

@purepower
It was a joke, but never mind...

If someone points to obvious faults and misconceptions, he is often marked as a big oil..(etc) debunker.

[purepower]

I know, I understand, I just dont want to be a "big oil outcast" three posts in...

[The Eskimo Quinn]

this post is only for those still working, i ask you to not believe me for one moment and go with pure power who does actually work for the enemy.

and take his own words, volumetric flow is reduced, a genius, if the flow rate in is 10 litres per second where does the missing flow go?? Wow magic from purepower, I will take the tests of Michael Bell a senior engineer and common sense over yours any day.

But let us put proof to the test,

I ask everyone on the site one question, why would the worlds greatest debunker build a device and not get the results or photograph a full and complete machine, after all you did build one right mr purepower??? those were your words were they not??

show us!!!!!

show everyone before you ever ask for any more proof ever on this site. And has anyone proved any of the claims??

Gee let me see, does not dustys wheel do what i said it would do at that point in his construction? did not redrider22 get the arms to break the wall?? in fact dustys moving the machine from outside at a gentle touch even shows this that with additional power from the outside it will run.

If you want to see a full machine running on that principal without the magnets, look at ab hammers video, no you know why he is pissed off, the key to his machine continuing to work was the rods and magnets.

proof show us your lies oil man, show us this machine you built to debunk me and you may speak again about proof.

He got into a private group to attempt to debunk the work and was kicked out for it, just follow the trail of his supporters to see who is who.

[The Eskimo Quinn]

I just realised the catch 22 for our oil man pure power, if he rebuilt the machine as in the plans, and although his airflow test may have been rubbish, for it to have worked at all even at a reduced flow means he Admits the Mighty Quin as being one of the smartest men alive.

For i will ask you all to go to the wikpedia definition of Venturi

sciece say you cant produce it without choking the flow, the machine proved this false as the ,ainline is always 200mm diamtre and the venturi still worked, so if he had increased temp from circulation the Venturi must have defied science to do it. So thanks for saying your temp rose becuase the heat looped. You just confirmed my status and abilities for all to see.

My money is you are just a blatatent liar who never built anything though right, liar??? so you are a liar or i did beat the worlds best scientists, take your pick buddy either will do me fine.

[purepower]

Hey Archer, was wondering when you would join in...

To start: "i ask you to not believe me for one moment and go with pure power who does actually work for the enemy..." Really, I work for "the enemy?" And who might this be? And wheres the support to back this? Yes, I do work for a Fortune 500 company, but they have nothing to do with energy...

And for my support to your thermal accelerator, I have no photos to support my study. It was conducted in thermalfluids lab at my university. It was performed using professional equipment and materials provided by the university. Like all lab studies performed using university material, everything was disassembled at the conclusion of the tests to be left for other future tests.

I constructed a adiabatic chamber with flow meters and thermometers at its entrance and exit. A fan and heating element with known values were placed in the chamber. A tube with valve was then placed with ends before and after the fan/heating element assembly, as described in your patent. Steady flow was achieved with the valve closed and exit temperature remained constant. Upon opening the valve, steady flow was reestablished at a lower value and temperature rose and allowed to climax. The change in temperature was proportional to the decrease in flow from the exit. One thing you seem to be missing, Archer, is depicted in the provided image.

I never said you cant get temperature to rise at the exit. I said you cant get the temperature to rise without changing the exit flow rate. If the same amount of heat energy is being expelled from the system (which it is), then the temperature of the exiting air will vary accordingly with how much air you are discharging. Simply put, discharge 10 Joules of heat energy in 10 liters of air and the temperature will be less than if you discharge 10 Joules of heat energy in 8 liters of air.

And what does the "venturi effect" have to do with this? In a choked flow system, the air is moving at a faster velocity at the throat, reducing the pressure. You will also find pressure drops in piping systems due to internal resistance within the pipe (even one of constant diameter). So you prove what? The laws as I know and love them...

Now for the personal attacks. You call me: "enemy," "oil man," "blatatent liar." What personal attacks did I ever issue? Pretty spiteful for "the Mighty Quin... one of the smartest men alive." So confident in you abilities that you result to playground superiority tactics?

And I have not "just confirmed my status and abilities for all to see." Like your approach to understanding mathematics and physics, you have read my posts and picked out and spun parts to try to make them work to your advantage. Im sorry Archer, but I dont think your fooling anyone (well, maybe some, but if theyre dumb enough to warrant your logic then there was no hope for them to begin with, another sheep in Archer's flock)...

And "the trail of his supporters?" Really Archer, think before you speak. What followers? All the followers I have gained in my five hours of membership to this site?