Roll on the 20th June

[House]

@exxcomm0n

Care to share your rod design?

[ramset]

OH... YOU   it could be QUINNIANS   seeing all this helpy helperton stuff [all these guys staying on topic]just makes me warm and mushy  ARCHERS topic is a puzzle they smashed   and now their trying to put it back together to show its junk  Smart fellows  patting themselves on the back havin fun !!  hope they got all the pieces        Ego's somtimes get in the way   its hard to bite your lip sometimes  and wait for all the pieces   before you smash the puzzle    there are some VERY FART SMELLAS here    what do I know?  I guess thats how you make progress  smash stuff /other peoples ideas   before they are finished   and pat yourself on the back for being so smart     Chet

[purepower]

@OU-812

Great observation. It has only been the skeptics (like myself) that have put forth any real contribution to the project. All the Archurias fall into two categories: 1) Archer is so much smarter than everyone that we just couldn't understand what he was saying or 2) the name callers and the spite bloggers.

A great mind one told me "the less you say, the more you know." Those who truly understand a topic or subject can effectively and efficiently describe the principals. Those who do not ramble on for days and days, leaving everyone dazed and confused. Sound like anyone we know?..

@Chet

Seriously, reread everything you said and ask youself if your post is still valid. I have successfully shattered the lever and thermal accelerator, both garbage and no one should waste their time even considering such devices (if they do, then it is their loss). All the details were gathered for the thermal accelerator as that is a "finished" project. Trash. Archer had provided enough details on the lever for anyone with a few brain cells still firing to realize is trash as well. The wheel is the only project I have provided constructive details to because this is the only Archurian (though the origins are in question) device I have seen with any potential.

TO ALL

I will address a few details on "proving claims." In the scientific community, anyone making a claim to results or facts outside the current paradigm carries the burden of proof. It is not, nor has it ever been or will be, up to others to prove them wrong. If you claim to have free energy, to restore a mass's potential energy with less energy than it takes to get the mass there regardless of how it gets there (sm0ky2), to have an overunity lever, THE BURDEN OF PROOF IS ON YOU. Everything I state is analytically, numerically correct and proven in lab with zero occurrences of anomaly (to date). If you want proof for what I say, ask and I will provide as much analysis as the keyboard will let me. If you want verification for what I state, open a damn textbook.

If you wish to provide proof for a claim, quantitative data (not qualitative) is required. Show numbers, calculations, measurements. Stating "well, it felt lighter" or "it moved easier" is not sufficient.

[ramset]

P    I don't think you smashed  crushed   anything  So your opinion is show me something working  and I will come out to play    like little red hen stuff     fairy tails!  your not preaching to the choir here     this is all about the unconventional  letting a man work on something different and see what he comes up with [LOTS of work] you backstabbed and hindered a man doing just that   for what purpose ? Newton ?   we dont think a like    inspiration can come from anyone anytime  lots of people doing things to change the world  And btw I would much have preffered to here about Archer's thoughts on his wheel from him and    PS I didnt spend a nickel I was waiting to see where he was going   figured why reinvent what he claimed to have    no need to smash and crush just watch and wait  it would only be 2 more weeks or so      and yes I thought the wheel most promising

[dirt diggler]

@ Purepower.
  " If you want verification for what I state, open a damn textbook"

I just did this and I guess I must be looking at "outdated" material, cause the table of elements are different than today, and there isn't any reference to superconductors etc.etc.  point being, NEW THINGS ARE BEING DISCOVERED EVERY DAY. just because you claim to be an engineer, doesn't mean anything, last time I checked bridges and buildings still collapse, and electronics still melt down, so that shows me how "all knowing" these so called engineers really are.