Roll on the 20th June

[MeccanoMan]

Hey guys,

I'm super new at all this, but I couldn't help but join in the "fun"

Been working on my own wheel replication made from meccano - which is possibly not the best material to build a semi-magnetic device from but there you go.

Thought I'd post a picture to see if you other replicators think I'm on the right track or not. I've labeled up the different parts I'd planned out - took a while to figure out how it could be done with the pieces but I'm learning! (clicky to see big version)




My magnets should arrive by monday and my new meccano set is waiting at the PO for me, so shouldn't be long til I finish in it's current state - btw anyone got an idea for the weights at the end of the arms?

[The Eskimo Quinn]

gee didnt i show the rods on the ground clown, ooh i videod them out, what a dickhead, balance the lever??

hey and you say i have lost the plot??? let me see if the lever is balanced, it cost more to lift it, making my job harder, if i leave on rod in it still makes my job harder.

but here is the real truth as now posted on the site. so that people can see they dony=t even need to understand how or why. your argument is only valid for return costs, crushed below forever

THE UNBEATABLE TRUTH
Many will try to confuse you with cost of energy, it is only to confuse you and keep you unsure of the discovery, so lets us give them that. read on 


Forget the fulcrum when looking to take it further just use known modern machines, purepower an his crew want to keep you on the fulcrum track as you are unsure, you only need know the lift worked, and that you already have. so to stop him and his oil mates confusing you jump straight to modern machines.


a modern wheel generator can take 40 kilos a fall energy and produce no less tha 39 kilos of energy correct? (ask any engineer)


a modern motor required to do 12 kilos of work will cost no more than 13 kilos correct? (ask any engineer)


if the entire beam weighs even 15 kilos (as it did originally before it snapped) and i use a fucking crane to lift the entire weight of the beam costing 15 kilos of energy, do i still have more power?


40 minus 28 ?? fucking shitloads


so what costs cannot be covered? yeah baby, and if pure power argues any modern machine power abilities every engineer in the world will crush him like a bug.


so let us do that again.


the beam lifts the weight yes?? you saw it


do you know how or why?? maybe maybe not but who fucking cares, it is in the air at the cost of 1 kilo per metre


we know the 1 kilo can get up there with a modern machine at a cost of 13 kilos yes??


we know that a modern wheel generator can get at least 39 kilos of power out from 40 kilos of energy in yes??


we dont give a fuck about arguments over the return cost, let them have total cost and get a fucking crane to lift the whole fucking empty beam at the reset angle at the cost of the total weight of the beam.




THEY STILL FUCKING LOOSE

It is truly over oil scum

Go ahead tell an engineer he is a dickhead and that modern generators wont produce 39 kilos of energy from an input of 40

Go ahead tell an engineer he is a dickhead and motren motors wont lift 1 kilo 12 metres for a cost of 13 kilos of energy

Go ahead tell an engineer he is a dickead  and a crane wont lift 15 kilos of weight with 15 kilos of energy produced

The only thing he doesnt have is a 20 to one lift device so you better tell him he is a dickhead becuase there isno video of any lever doing any such thing is there?.

To all the scum buying the oil shares, go hard, sell your house buy more, so you loose the fucking lot. Mitsubishi is going rapidly to all electric cars, and so is everyone else. you are fucked anyway, I am just making the fucking a whole lot faster, and making sure your coal an gas mates go with you.



ooohhh ooohhh the cost of the lever return !!

dickheads.

[The Eskimo Quinn]

still no OU.

40 down to 39

less 13 to lift the light weight

less 15 to lift the whole fucking beam back through the fucking air

that is still only a 28 unit cost with a 39 output, wow your math really sucks

they can see you struggling now,

give the poor bastard 20 percent more cost for his motors


oops still loose you lying dickhead

[onesnzeros]

well we dont talk to legendre, because he's and oil man, who just likes to use the best attack and say nothing unusual here, clearly the beam is heavier at the longer end??? you cant be serious, i think i read that from every oil person????seriously heavier at the longer end. but of course every beam beam in the world divided 5 to 1 wouldn't be heavier at the longer end would it??? every fucking beam ever fucking used in every fucking text book ein evrery fucking site in the fucking world isnt fucking heaver at the fucking long end, every fucking piece of lying newtonian bullshit isnt also heavier at the fucking long end??? Fuck off

Wow Archer, you are amazing. Do you mean to tell this group that you are getting 20:1 lift with a 5:1 lever using 1kg at one end and 20kg at the other end? You don't think that if you add the differential weight caused by the long end of the lever to the 1kg, that in fact you have proven Newton correct? Do you see the fucking irony in this? You are insane brother.

as for mr ratcliff, so sorry you were disappointed, yes today i was only able to break the laws of thermodynamics and shatter the leverage laws that are used to calculate what holds the wings on you plane when you fly. perhaps next time an interesting story for you.

You didn't BREAK the law of thermodynamics ARCHER you PROVED the law, do you see the fucking irony in this?

As for the rest of you, i am not going to build your machines for you, get off your ass. I dont need to build it to running,newtons math is dead, so too there is overunity in lift. there is nothing special about the weight of the beam, and i can return it with 2 kilos. you simply forget the other end is also a lever and with an empty lightweigh gutter section at the back end past the lift point, i simply have 2 kilos of the weight fall down to the end of the rear leverage point.

simply have the beam extended end down as far as you want it to go, now draw a straight horizonal line from the back end of the heavy end, so you basically change direction, so your weights fall off together 18 kilos and 2 kilos 18 kilos will hit super fast compared to the slightly below vertical tilt of the rear extension, it will run down to a capture point and the beam will rise again, the rear extension is quite short abouit 3 metres no weight, remember it is only lifting an empty beam. i will at some point weigh the whole thing as best i can  for those building, but if you cant spend five dollars on some sticks and conduit, then you are simply a lazy person or here for the oil and government. it is over people like or dont like it.

You got a long way to go to untangle that last two paragraphs of foggy bullshit. Forget weighing the lever, just balance the fucking lever first THEN add the 1 kg and the 20kg weights and see what it does. Actually, don't waste your time, because the 20 kg weight will catapult the fuckin 1kg wieght into the air. Newton rules get over it.

onesnzeros







end trans
[/quote]

[The Eskimo Quinn]

ROFL

just realised the video show the return cost, rofl laughing, the drum weighs 20 kilos

and already has it returned with no leverage at all