Roll on the 20th June

[dirt diggler]

The Archurians understand this and have made it an emotion based discussion. Instead of stating claims and supporting them, they attack us personally. The create false accusations as to why we would deceive the public when this is obviously not the case. We are better than that; lets not stoop to their level and remain as matter-of-fact as we are able. By doing so, it will become obvious who the victors are. Allow them to follow who they will and conduct and portray themselves as they wish. It will soon become obvious to all who really has something to hide and who is really out to deceive.

I'm just using a simple sony cybershot 7.2 megapix.  I take tons of pics(kids are at that age)  I'm not trying to spout off, just letting you know the results that I get.  to tell you the truth, I like the old carbon pile bats the best.  when they go dead, you just give them a whack on the end and crunch the pile back together.(they always erode in the middle first) then you get to use them all over again!!!!

[dirt diggler]

I'm just using a simple sony cybershot 7.2 megapix.  I take tons of pics(kids are at that age)  I'm not trying to spout off, just letting you know the results that I get.  to tell you the truth, I like the old carbon pile bats the best.  when they go dead, you just give them a whack on the end and crunch the pile back together.(they always erode in the middle first) then you get to use them all over again!!!!

ooopps, that was totally the wrong quote.  that was supposed to be for purepower!!

[Rusty_Springs]

To the newtonians... actually anyone.

Can you think of any better ways to harness the power of gravity?

Archers designs provide some rather interesting thoughts working OU or not they do provide a fairly interesting point of view from a design standpoint...

He is not an idiot as you all choose to call him his designs seem more then just your run of the mill guess work.

I was wonder if any of these so called experts have a better plan to harness gravity like wind or the sun?


-infringer-

I'm not saying Archers a idiot I'm saying like most of you his learning about pullies and
levage, sure its what people have know for years but most only see it when they experiment, like when I said at the begining a small weight will lift a big weight and I told you how you can test this by just using a spoon and moving the center of gravity or pivit point to the big part of the spoon and you will see it lift, I also said put so weight in the spoon and you will also see it lift to a point, if fact I could be wrong and I'm not going back to find out but it was after I made this point that Archer starting talking about his lever.
It took Power to show this point on video and still people can't see it or beleave it.
Take Care All
Graham

[exxcomm0n]

The link YOU provided stated a lithium battery will outperform an akaline.

A 2nd link I provided, using the SAME resource you used (wikipedia) provided additional evidence of the same.

The CHART I provided showed results of a REAL WORLD test showing clearly that a lithium ion provides greater energy density.

You don't really STILL believe an akaline battery will outperform a lithium ion do you?  Wouldn't your cellphone/camera/laptop use an akaline over a lithium ion if it outperformed?

You are proposing another example of - I/we MUST do the experiment to prove it when it has been done countless times already and the data is clear.

We are awfully good @ selective viewing today, aren't we Mr. Myoptic?

I said:

"
1.) http://www.buchmann.ca/Article2-page1.asp (pay attention to the second sub-heading.)

2.) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lithium_battery
See how many different grades, types, and forms there are for so many different uses?

I have yet to see real world comparison (same device, same consumer grade battery form
and voltage factor).
Let's go for a flashlight battery comparison, eh?

When I changed the search criteria to "battery charge comparison lithium" I got this:

http://www.powerstream.com/Compare.htm

....had some interesting results."

Look, just because it came outta Archers mouth doesn't mean it's sacrement.

The only thing I know is I DON'T KNOW since I don't have a real world comparison.

We're both taking our examples from the 'net as if they were scripture though.
I'm as guilty as you in this respect.

But I found links that support the argument that the difference might not be that vast (absolute best I saw on your chart was 1/3 better).

But back to the tests....... countless times, yet differing data.

How does that happen?

Isn't it like 2 guys debating on the net having a difference of opinion?

Now, how do we fix that?

A set of alkaline, a set Lithium (which variety though?), and a flashlight.

Again, all manufacturers are beyond reproach as to the data they post?

I'm sure that one of our examples might be true.
In fact they all might be, but not using the same base form for comparison.

Find me the link of the flashlight batteries please.

[Evg]

Archer
When you have time, could you just video the section of where the fulcrum pivots on its support with the fulcrum in different positions. I am still open-minded but to understand more I need to see the movement of that small section